Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:22:20.165Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electron holes and their role in the dynamics of current-carrying weakly collisional plasmas. Part 1. Immobile ions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

J. Korn  and
H. Schamel
J. Korn
Affiliation:
Physikalisches Institut, Universität Bayreuth, D-95440 Bayreuth, Germany
H. Schamel
Affiliation:
Physikalisches Institut, Universität Bayreuth, D-95440 Bayreuth, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Solutions of the Vlasov-Fokker-Planck-Poisson system in a current-carrying plasma are analysed theoretically and numerically in the collisionless and weakly collisional approximations. The class of electron holes is extended, and new solitary electron hole and hump equilibria are found. Numerical solutions of the full time-dependent self-consistent problem are presented that show the non-existence of structural dissipative equilibria as long as ions are treated as an immobile background.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 56 , Issue 2 , October 1996 , pp. 307 - 337
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Armstrong, T. P. 1967 Phys. Fluids 10, 1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, T. & Montgomery, D. 1967 J. Plasma Phys. 1, 425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, T.P., Harding, R.C.Knorr, C. & Montgomery, D. 1970 Methods of Computational Physics, Vol. 9, p. 29. Academic Press. New York.Google Scholar
Bainbetov, F. & Tsintsadze, N. L. 1969 Soviet J. Tech. Phys. 39, 1781.Google Scholar
Berman, R.H., Tetreault, D. J., Dupree, T. H. & Boutros-Ghali, T. 1982 Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 784.Google Scholar
Berman, R.H., Tetreault, D. J. & Dupree, T. H. 1983 Phys. Fluids 26, 2437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, R.H., Dupree, T. H. & Tetreault, D. J. 1986 Phys. Fluids 29, 2860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchnan, M. & Dorning, J.J. 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchnan, M. & Dorning, J.J. 1994 Phys. Rev. E 50, 1465.Google Scholar
Bujarbarua, S. & Schamel, H. 1981 J. Plasma Phys. 25, 515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, F.F. 1985 Introduction to Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
Coppi, B. 1994 Plasma Phys. Contr Fusion 36, B107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordey, J.G. et al. 1994 Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion 36, A267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordey, J.G. et al. 1995 Nucl. Fusion 35 505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demeio, L. & Holloway, J.P. 1991 J. Plasma Phys. 46, 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demeio, L. & Zweifel, P.F. 1990 Phys. Fluids B 2, 1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupree, T.H. 1983 Phys. Fluids 26, 2460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erckmann, V. & Gasparino, U. 1994 Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion 36, 1869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giaconne, L., Balbin, R., Niedermeyer, H., Endler, M., Herre, G., Hidalgo, C., Rudyi, A., Theimer, G., Verplanke, Ph. & the W7-AS Team 1994 Phys. Plasmas 1, 3614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, F.C. & Feix, M.R. 1967 Phys. Fluids 10, 696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greiner, F., Klinger, T. & Piel, A. 1995 Phys. Plasmas 2, 1810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holloway, J.P. & Dorning, J.J. 1991 Phys. Rev. A 44, 3856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpman, V.I. 1975 Nonlinear Waves in Dispersive Media Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Klinger, T., Greiner, F., Rohde, A. & Piel, A. 1995 Phys. Plasmas 2, 1822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korn, J. & Schamel, H. 1996 J. Plasma Phys. 56, 339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liewer, P.C. 1985 Nucl. Fusion 25, 543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynov, J. P., Michelsen, P., Péscei, H. L., Rasmussen, J. J., Saeki, K. & Turikov, V. A. 1979. Physica Scripta 20, 328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machabeli, G. Z. & Tsintsadze, N. L. 1968 Soviet J. Tech. Phys. 38, 1427.Google Scholar
Mantel, T. D., Doveil, F. & Gresillon, D. 1976 Plasma Phys. 18, 705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schamel, H. 1972 Plasma Phys. 14, 905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schamel, H. 1975 J. Plasma Phys. 13, 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schamel, H. 1979 Physica Scripta 20, 336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schamel, H. 1982 a The theory of double layers. Invited Lecture, Symposium on Plasma Double Layers, Roskilde, Denmark, Risø- R-472.Google Scholar
Schamel, H. 1982 b Physica Scripta T 2/1, 228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schamel, H. 1983 Z. Naturforsch. 38 a, 1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schamel, H. 1986 Phys. Rep. 140, 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schamel, H. & Bujarbarua, S. 1980 Phys. Fluids 23, 2498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schamel, H. & Bujarbarua, S. 1983 Phys. Fluids 26, 190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenflo, L. 1969 J. Atmos. Terr. Phys. 31, 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, D.C., Weitzner, H. & Pfirsch, D. 1992 Phys. Fluids B 4, 2769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tetreault, D.J. 1983 Phys. Fluids 26, 3247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar