Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T13:51:56.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of lithium and heavier ions on electromagnetic proton cyclotron instability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

S. Cuperman
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel
L. Gomberoff
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel
A. Sternlieb
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel

Abstract

The effects of lithium and heavier ions (i.e. having specific charge Zj e/mj smaller than the proton's), on the electromagnetic cyclotron instability in warm anisotropic (bi-maxwellian) proton plasmas, are analytically and numerically investigated. It is found that the occurrence of resonances for modes with ωr = Ωjr, real wave frequency; Ωj, ion gyrofrequency), which produce a cut-off in the phase velocity, leads to the possible existence of two different situations. (i) If the proton thermal anisotropy is smaller than a critical value A pc (which depends on the ion specific charge), the resonance and therefore the ‘stop band’ occurs outside the unstable range. The maximum growth rate, as well as the instability range in k space, may increase with the relative ion concentration ion and warm proton particle densities, respectively. There is an optimum value of η for maximum enhancement of the instability. (ii) If Ap > Apc, the unstable spectrum in Wr space is divided by the ‘stop band’ into two distinct regions. In the higher-frequency region, the maximum growth rate, as well as the width of the unstable spectrum, decrease with increasing relative ion concentration. For η > ηc, the instability is completely suppressed. In the lower-frequency region, however, the maximum growth rate and the extension in k space may increase with η.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cornwall, J. M. & Schulz, M. 1971 J. Geophys. Res. 76, 7791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuperman, S., Salu, Y., Bernstein, W. & Williams, D. J. 1973 J. Geophys. Res. 78, 7372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuperman, S., & Landau, R. 1974 J. Geophys. Res. 79, 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuperman, S., & Salu, Y. 1974 J. Geophys. Res. 79, 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuperman, S., Gomberoff, L. & Sternlieb, A. 1975 J. Plasma Phys. 13, 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennel, C. F. & Petschek, H. E. 1966 J. Geophys. Res. 71, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar