Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T13:46:06.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of electron temperature anisotropy on the propagation of whistler waves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

Tomikazu Namikawa ,
Hiromitsu Hamabata  and
Kazuhiko Tanabe
Tomikazu Namikawa
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan
Hiromitsu Hamabata
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan
Kazuhiko Tanabe
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The first-order Chew, Goldberger & Low (GGL) equations for electrons including the effect of finite Larmor radius are applied to the whistler wave. The zerothorder velocity distribution function for electrons in the GGL expansion is assumed to be an anisotropic Maxwellian. The effect of electron thermal motion on the propagation of whistler waves is analysed by use of a dispersion relation and properties of the refractive index surface. It is shown that the electron thermal motion intensifies the tendency of whistler waves to follow the lines of force of the earth's magnetic field at appropriate values of electron temperature anisotropy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , August 1981 , pp. 83 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bowers, E. 1971 J. Plasma Phys. 6, 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chew, C. F., Goldberger, M. L. & Low, F. E. 1956 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 236, 435.Google Scholar
Deforest, S. E. & McIlwain, C. E. 1971 J. Geophys. Res. 76, 3587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedele, J. B. 1969 J. Plasma Phys. 3, 673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frieman, E., Davidson, R. & Lanodon, B. 1966 Phys. Fluids, 9, 1475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macmahon, A. 1965 Phys. Fluids, 8, 1840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morioka, S. & Spreiter, J. R. 1970 J. Plasma Phys. 4, 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obayashi, T. 1970 Space Science – Solar Terrestrial Physics, p. 289. Shôkabô.Google Scholar
Simon, A. & Thompson, W. B. 1966 Plasma Phys. 8, 373.Google Scholar
Stix, T. H. 1962 The Theory of Plasma Waves, §3–4. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. B. 1961 Rep. Prog. Phys. 14, 363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yajima, N. 1966 Prog. Theor. Phys. 36, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar