Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:48:13.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Drift instability in the presence of a parallel electric field and an inhomogeneous magnetic field: particle aspect analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

M. S. Tiwari  and
P. Varma
M. S. Tiwari
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Sagar, Sagar, Madhya Pradesh 470 003, India
P. Varma
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Sagar, Sagar, Madhya Pradesh 470 003, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The theory of particle aspect analysis is extended to a drift wave in the presence of an inhomogeneous magnetic field and an applied electric field parallel to the ambient magnetic field. The effect of a parallel electric field is included in the zeroth-order distribution function through modification of the particle thermal velocity in that direction. The plasma under consideration is assumed to be anisotropic and with low β. The dispersion relation and growth rate are evaluated and discussed for particular plasma parameters. The limitations of the theory are also pointed out.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , August 1991 , pp. 49 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alfvén, H. 1958 Tellus, 10, 104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aydemir, A. Y., Berk, H. L., Mirnov, V., Pogutse, O. P. & Rosenbluth, M. N. 1987 Phys. Fluids, 30, 3083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bers, A. & Brueck, S. R. J. 1968 Quarterly Progress Report, Electronics Research Laboratory, MIT, no. 89, p. 156.Google Scholar
Cole, K. D. & Aggson, T. L. 1976 Planet. Space Sci. 24, 518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derra, G., Kaiser, J. & Schlüter, H. 1988 Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion, 30, 1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreicer, H. 1960 Phys. Rev. 117, 329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evrard, M. P., Messiaen, A. M., Vandenplas, P. E. & Vanoost, G. 1979 Plasma Phys. 21, 999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gary, S. P. 1983 J. Plasma Phys. 30, 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gary, S. P. & Sanderson, J. J. 1979 Phys. Fluids, 22, 1500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasegawa, A. 1969 Phys. Fluids, 12, 2642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasegawa, A. 1971 J. Geophys. Res. 76, 5361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastings, D. E. & McCune, J. E. 1982 Phys. Fluids, 25, 4581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendel, H. W. & Chu, T. K. 1970 Methods of Experimental Physics, vol. 9A (ed. Griem, H. R. & Lovborg, R. H.), p. 345. Academic.Google Scholar
Hendel, H. W., Coppi, B., Perkins, F. & Politzer, P. A. 1967 Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadomtsev, B. B. 1965 Plasma Turbulence. Academic.Google Scholar
Kan, J. R. 1982 Space Sci. Rev. 31, 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozhevnikov, A. A., Mikhailovsky, A. B. & Pokhotelov, O. A. 1976 Planet. Space Sci. 24, 465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lüthen, G. & Schlüter, H. 1988 Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion, 28, 316.Google Scholar
Marchenko, V. A., Nezlina, Yu. M. & Pokhotelov, O. A. 1988 Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion, 30, 957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maük, B. H. & Zanetti, L. J. 1987 Rev. GeoPhys. 25, 541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikhailovsky, A. B. & Fridman, A. M. 1967 Soviet Phys. JETP, 24, 965.Google Scholar
Milantiev, V. P. & Ortis, T. 1982 Plasma Phys. 24, 1493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misra, K. D., Nielsen, E. & Luhr, L. 1985 J. Geophys. Res. 90, 10923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misra, K. D., Singh, B. D. & Mishra, S. P. 1979 J. Geophys. Res. 84, 5923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mozer, F. S., Wygant, J. R., Boehm, M. H., Cattell, C. A. & Temerin, M. 1985 Space Sci. Rev. 42, 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilipenko, O. A. & Pokhotelov, O. A. 1977 Geomagn. Aeron. 17, 112.Google Scholar
Pines, D. & Schrieffer, J. R. 1961 Phys. Rev. 124, 1387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pokhotelov, O. A. & Pilipenko, V. A. 1976 Geomagn. Aeron. 16, 296.Google Scholar
Rostoker, G. 1978 Geomagn. Geolectr. 30, 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudakov, L. I. & Sagdeev, R. Z. 1958 Plasma Physics and the Problem of Controlled Thermonuclear Reactions, vol. 3, p. 268.Google Scholar
Rukhadze, A. A. & Silin, V. P. 1969 Soviet Phys. Usp. 11, 659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, N., Thiemann, H. & Schunk, R. W. 1986 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 14, 805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terashima, Y. 1967 Prog. Theor. Phys. 37, 775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiwari, M. S., Pandey, R. P. & Misra, K. D. 1985 J. Plasma Phys. 34, 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiwari, M. S. & Rostoker, G. 1984 Planet. Space Sci. 32, 1497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winske, D. & Gary, S. P. 1979 Phys. Fluids, 22, 665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar