Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T13:08:33.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dissipative magnetohydrodynamic states with non-ideal boundary conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

Y. Z. Agim
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, U.S.A.
D. Montgomery
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, U.S.A.

Abstract

A driven dissipative magnetohydrodynamic state is calculated that is consistent with a non-ideal boundary condition relevant to magnetically and mechanically active boundaries of laboratory or astrophysical plasmas. The solution is based on the results from previous analytical and computational investigations of electrically driven states, and is characterized by finite helical distortions and a small flow velocity. It is shown that such a configuration may persist even in the absence of previously assumed rigid perfectly conducting boundaries. It is proposed as a model for an astrophysical ‘flux rope’, and suggests an additional in situ diagnostic for such flux ropes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agim, Y. Z. & Montgomery, D. 1991 Plasma. Phys. (in press).Google Scholar
Dahlburg, J. P., Montgomery, D., Doolen, G. D. & Turner, L. 1987 J. Plasma Phys. 37, 299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlburg, J. P., Montgomery, D., Doolen, G. D. & Turner, L. 1988 J. Plasma Phys. 40, 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elphic, R. C, Cattell, C. A., Takahashi, K., Bame, S. J. & Russell, C. T. 1986 Geophys. Res. Lett. 13, 648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elphic, R. C. & Russell, C. T. 1983 J. Geophys. Res. 88, 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, D. 1990 Trends in Theoretical Physics (ed. Ellis, P. J. & Tang, Y. C.), vol. 1. Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Montgomery, D. & Phillips, L. 1988 Phys. Rev. A 38, 2953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, D. & Phillips, L. 1989 Physica, D 37, 215.Google Scholar
Montgomery, D., Phillips, L. & Theobald, M. L. 1989 Phys. Rev. A 40, 1515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piddington, J. H. 1978 Astrophys. Space Sci. 55, 401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priest, E. R. 1990 Proceedings of AGU Chapman Conference on the Physics of Magnetic Flux Ropes (ed. Russell, C. T.). Geophys. Monogr. Ser., vol. 58, p. 1. American Geophysical Union.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, C. T. 1985 Unstable Current Systems and Plasma Instabilities in Astrophysics. Proceedings of IAU Symposium no. 107 (ed. Kundu, M. R. and Holman, G. D.), p. 25. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, C. T. (ed.) 1990 Proceedings of AGU Chapman Conference on the Physics of Magnetic Flux Ropes. Geophys. Monogr. Ser., vol. 58, p. 413. American Geophysical Union.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, C. T. & Elphic, R. C. 1978 Space Sci. Rev. 22, 681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, C. T. & Elphic, R. C. 1979 Nature, 279, 616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholer, M., Klecker, B., Hovestadt, D., Gloecker, G., Ipavich, G. F. M. & Glavin, A. B. 1985 Geophys. Res. Lett. 12, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibeck, D. G., Siscoe, G. L., Slavin, J. A., Smith, E. J., Bame, S. J. & Scarf, F. L. 1984 Geophys. Res. Lett. 10, 1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storer, R. G. 1983 Plasma Phys. 25, 1279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. B. 1974 Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 1139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. B. 1986 Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theobald, M. L. & Montgomery, D. 1990 J. Geophys. Res. 95, 14893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theobald, M. L., Montgomery, D., Doolen, G. D. & Dahlburg, J. P. 1989 Phys. Fluids, B 1, 766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar