Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T00:48:23.004Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The collisional drift mode in a partly-ionized plasma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

Mary K. Hudson  and
Charles F. Kennel
Mary K. Hudson
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, Los Angeles
Charles F. Kennel
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, Los Angeles
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The structure of the drift instability is examined in several density regimes. Let λ e be the total electron mean free path, kz the wave-vector component along the magnetic field, and ν ⊥ / ν ∥ the ratio of perpendicular ion diffusion to parallel electron streaming rates. At low densities (kz ν e > 1), the drift mode is isothermal, and should be treated kinetically. In the finite heat conduction regime

the drift instability threshold is reduced at low densities (v⊥/v‖<0·1) and increased at high densities (v⊥/v‖>0·1), as compared with the isothermal threshold. Finally, in the energy transfer limit (kzλe<(m/M)½), the drift instability behaves adiabatically in a fully-ionized plasma, and isothermally in a partly-ionized plasma, for an ion-neutral to Coulomb collision frequency ratio vin/vii>2(m/M)½ at Ti = Tc = Tn.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , August 1975 , pp. 135 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Braginskii, S. I. 1965 Reviews of Plasma Physics, vol. 1 (ed. Leontovitch, M. A.), p. 205.Google Scholar
Chu, T. K., Coppi, B., Hendel, H. W. & Perkins, F. W. 1969 Phys. Fluids, 12, 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coroniti, F. V. & Kennel, C. F. 1970 J. Geophys. Res. 75, 1863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. F. & Motley, R. W. 1974 Phys. Fluids, 17, 582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farley, P. T., Balsley, B. B., Woodman, R. F. & McClure, J. P. 1970 J. Ceophys. Res. 75, 7199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, M. K. 1974 Ph.D. thesis, Department of Physics, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Hudson, M. K. & Kennel, C. F. 1975 a J. Geophys. Res. (To be published.)Google Scholar
Hudson, M. K. & Kennel, C. F. 1975 b J. Plasma Phys. 14, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, M. K. & Kennel, C. F. 1975 c Phys. Fluids. (To be published.)Google Scholar
Scrunk, R. W. & Walker, J. C. G. 1970 Planet. Space Sci. 18, 1535.Google Scholar
Shkarofsky, I. P. 1961 Can. J. Phys. 39, 1619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsai, S. T., Perkins, F. W. & Stix, T. H. 1970 Phys. Fluids, 13, 2108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar