Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T15:59:21.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A theory for Langmuir solitons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

N. Nagesha Rao  and
Ram K. Varma
N. Nagesha Rao
Affiliation:
Physical Research Laboratory, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad 380 009, India
Ram K. Varma
Affiliation:
Physical Research Laboratory, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad 380 009, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A systematic and self-consistent analysis of the problem of Langmuir solitons in the entire range of Mach numbers (0 < M < 1) has been presented. A coupled set of nonlinear equations for the amplitude of the modulated, high-frequency Langmuir waves and the associated low-frequency ion waves is derived without using the charge neutrality condition or any a priori ordering schemes. A technique has been developed for obtaining analytic solutions of these equations where any arbitrary degree of ion nonlinearity consistent with the nonlinearity retained in the Langmuir field can be taken into account self-consistently. A class of solutions with non-zero Langmuir field intensity at the centre (ξ = 0) are found for intermediate values of the Mach number. Using these solutions, a smooth transition from single-hump solitons to the double-hump solitons with respect to the Mach number has been established through the definitions of critical and cut-off Mach numbers. Further, under appropriate limiting conditions, various solutions discussed by other authors are obtained. Sagdeev potential analyses of the solutions for the Langmuir field as well as the ion field are carried out. These analyses confirm the transition from single-hump solitons to the double-hump solitons with respect to the Mach number. The existence of many-hump solitons for higher-order nonlinearities in the low-frequency ion wave potential has been conjectured. The method of solution developed here can be applied to similar equations in other fields.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , February 1982 , pp. 95 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Appert, K. & Vaclavik, J. 1977 Phys. Fluids, 20, 1845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Degtyarev, L. M. & Makhankov, V. G. & Rudakov, L. I. 1975 Soviet Phys. JETP, 40, 264.Google Scholar
Gibbons, J., Thornhill, S. G., Wardrop, M. J. & Ter, Haar D. 1977 J. Plasma Phys. 17, 153.Google Scholar
Ikezi, H., Nishikawa, K., Hojo, H. & Mima, K. 1974 Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Tokyo, vol. 2, p. 609. IAEA.Google Scholar
Ikezi, H., Chang, R. P. H. & Stern, R. A. 1976 Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 1047.Google Scholar
Karpman, V. I. 1975 Physica Scripta, 11, 263.Google Scholar
Kim, H. C., Stenzel, R. L. & Wong, A. Y. 1974 Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laedke, E. W. & Spatschek, K. H. 1979 Phys. Lett., A 75, 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makhankov, V. G. 1974 a Phys. Lett. A 50, 42.Google Scholar
Makhankov, V. G. 1974 b JINR (Dubna) Preprint E5–8389.Google Scholar
Nicholson, D. R. & Goldman, M. V. 1978 Phys. Fluids, 21, 1766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishikawa, K.Hojo, H., Mima, K. & Ikezi, H. 1974 Phys. Rev. Lets. 33, 148.Google Scholar
Rudakov, L. I. 1973 Soviet Phys. JETP, 17, 1166.Google Scholar
Schamel, H., Yu, M. Y. & Shukla, P. K. 1977 Phys. Fluids, 20, 1286.Google Scholar
Varma, R. K. & Rao, N. N. 1980 Phys. Lett., A 79, 311.Google Scholar
Wang, P. K. C. 1978 J. Math. Phys. 19, 1286.Google Scholar
Wong, A. Y. & Quon, B. H. 1975 Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 1499.Google Scholar
Zakharov, V. E. 1972 Soviet Phys. JETP, 35, 908.Google Scholar