Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T14:22:28.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A theoretical investigation of banded chorus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

David Nunn
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Kings College, University of London

Abstract

This paper is a computational study of nonlinear resonant particle trajectories in wave fields consisting of an array of narrow-band waves of closely spaced frequencies and wavenumbers. It looks at two analogous systems, cyclotron resonance with a whistler wavefield and Landau resonance with an electrostatic wave field. It is found that the wave array is able to trap particles in much the same way as a single mode. Inhomogeneity plays a vital role by causing the energy of trapped particles to change.

The nonlinear resonant particle current is such as to preserve the modal structure of the wave field, and it does not change the frequency of an individual mode. Power distribution amongst the modes is far from even. Most of the energy goes into the mode at one end of the array, depending on the direction of the inhomogeneity. Also, nonlinear resonant particle excitation of a broad band signal was found to cause spectral structuring to develop automatically.

The theory was applied to one of Coroniti's FTRS analyses of banded chorus elements. The observed spectral behaviour closely accorded with the computational results. The numbers involved fitted the theory very well, and strongly suggested that nonlinear cyclotron resonant particle excitation is the mechanism for banded chorus.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abdalla, M. 1970 Planet. Space Sci. 18, 1799.Google Scholar
Burtis, W. J. & Helliwell, R. A. 1969 J. Geophys. Res. 74, 3002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coroniti, F. V., Fredericks, R. W., Kennel, C. F. & Scarf, F. L. 1971 J. Geophys.Rev. 74, 2366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helliwell, R. A. 1965 Whistlers and Related Ionospheric Phenomena. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Helliwell, R. A. 1967 J. Geophys. Res. 72, 4773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpman, V. I. & Shklyar, D. R. 1972 Soviet Phys. JETP, 35, 500.Google Scholar
Nunn, D. 1973 Planet. Space Sci. 21, 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunn, D. 1974 Planet. Space Sci. (To be published.)Google Scholar
Ossokow, S. L., Ott, E. & Haber, I. 1972 Phys. Fluids, 15, 2314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sudan, R. N. & Ott, E. 1971 J. Geophys. Res. 76, 4463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaslavskii, G. M. & Chirikov, B. V. 1972 Soviet Phys. Uspheki, 14, 549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar