Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T00:37:34.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relaxation of magnetic field in a plasma via the tearing mode

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

S. K. H. Auluck
S. K. H. Auluck
Affiliation:
Neutron Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Bombay 400085, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A simple argument based on energetics is presented to bring out the similarities between diverse plasmas which undergo current filamentation. The predictions of this argument are found to be in agreement with more detailed theoretical results and experimental data.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , April 1986 , pp. 311 - 317
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Auluck, S. K. H. 1986 J. Plasma Phys. 35, 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, A., Coudeville, A., Jolas, A., Launspach, J. & De Mascureau, J. 1975 Phys. Fluids, 18, 180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodin, H. A. B. 1963 Nucl. Fusion, 3, 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bostick, W. H., Prior, W., Grunberger, L. & Emmert, G. 1966 Phys. Fluids, 9, 2079.Google Scholar
Bostick, W. H., Nardi, C. & Prior, W. 1975 Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 251, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bykovsky, U. A. & Lagoda, V. B. 1981 Proceedings of 10th European Conference on Plasma Physics, Moscow, vol. 1, D-9.Google Scholar
Ferro, Fontan C. & Sicardi, Schifino A. 1978 Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Energy Storage, Compression & Switching, Venice.Google Scholar
Filippov, N. V. 1980 JETP lett. 31, 120.Google Scholar
Furth, H. P., Killeen, J. & Rosenbluth, M. N. 1963 Phys. Fluids, 6, 459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold, T. & Hoyle, F. 1960 Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 120, 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herold, H., Jaeger, U., Schmidt, H., Schmidt, B., Shakhatre, M. & Shyam, A. 1985 Proceedings of DPG Symposium, Bayreuth.Google Scholar
Iyyengar, S. K., Ron, P. H., Mittal, K-C., Goel, A. K., Ramaswamy, V. & Rohatgi, V. K. 1977 BARC Technical Report 960.Google Scholar
Kadomtsev, B. B. 1977 Nucl. Fusion Suppl. 1, 555.Google Scholar
Kvartskhava, I. F., Kervalidze, K. N., Gvaladze, Yu. S. & Kapanadze, B. N. 1962 Nucl. Fusion, Suppl. Part II, p. 533.Google Scholar
Lehnert, B. 1985 Comments on Plasma Physics, 9, 91.Google Scholar
Lovberg, R. H. 1965 Phys. Fluids, 8, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murty, G. S. 1961 Ark. Phys. 19, 495.Google Scholar
Muir, D. G. 1983 Ph.D. Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Parker, R. K., Anderson, R. E. & Duncan, C. V. 1974 J. Appl. Phys. 45, 2463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweet, P. A. 1958 Nuovo Cimento Suppl. 8, 188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toepfer, A. J. & Bradley, L. P. 1972 J. App. Phys. 43, 3033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vikhrev, V. V. 1977 Soviet J. Plasma Phys. 3, 539.Google Scholar
Witalis, E. 1980 Atomkernenergee-Kerntechnik, 36, 177.Google Scholar