Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:50:58.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Numerical Simulation Of A Bi-directional Plasma Thruster For Space Debris Removal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2022

Vinod Saini  and
Rajaraman Ganesh Open the ORCID record for Rajaraman Ganesh [Opens in a new window]
Vinod Saini*
Affiliation:
Institute For Plasma Research, Gandhinagar382428, India
Rajaraman Ganesh
Affiliation:
Institute For Plasma Research, Gandhinagar382428, India Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra400094, India
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A spacecraft during mission typically switches from chemical propulsion to electric propulsion once it lifts out of the Earth's gravity as the thrust requirement to drive it reduces substantially. Consequently, electric propulsion technology is commonly used for deep space mission, satellite orbit keeping and orbit correction. In the last few decades, the amount of man-made space junk (space debris) has increased enormously and has become a potential danger for space stations, space shuttles and other live satellites. A bi-directional plasma thruster, mounted on a satellite, can be used to remove space debris during satellite operation (Takahashi et al., Sci. Rep., vol. 8, 2018, p. 14417). A directed ion beam ejected from a plasma thruster imparts a net force on space debris to decelerate and facilitates manoeuvring and re-entry of space debris into the Earth's atmosphere where it can burn out. We present a detailed 1D3V PIC-MCC (particle in cell-Monte Carlo collision) simulation of a bi- directional plasma thruster. To this end, a PIC-MCC solver which resolves thruster axial direction and all three velocity dimensions is used to study a magnetic nozzle plasma thruster with both ends open (bi-directional plasma thruster). We show that such a bi-directional plasma thruster can be used to accelerate–decelerate a live satellite and also to remove space debris by altering the magnetic field spatial profile in the plasma expansion region. A detailed study is presented.

Keywords

plasma simulationplasma devicesplasma applications
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 88 , Issue 2 , April 2022 , 905880203
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baalrud, S.D., Lafleur, T., Boswell, R.W. & Charles, C. 2011 Particle-in-cell simulations of a current-free double layer. Phys. Plasmas 18 (6), 063502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsall, C.K. & Langdon, A.B. 1992 Plasma Physics via Computer Simulation. Institute of Physics Publishing.Google Scholar
Bombardelli, C. & Peláez, J. 2011 Ion beam shepherd for contact less space debris removal. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 34, 916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boris, J. 1970 In Proceeding of Fourth Conference on numerical simulation of plasma. Naval Research Laboratory, p. 3.Google Scholar
Boswell, R.W., Takahashi, K., Charles, C. & Kaganovich, I.D. 2015 Non-local electron energy probability function in a plasma expanding along a magnetic nozzle. Front. Phys. 3, Article 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, K.L., Verboncoeur, J.P. & Birdsall, C.K. 2000 Loading and Injection of Maxwellian Distributions in Particle Simulations. J. Comput. Phys. 162, 483–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castronuovo, M.M. 2011 Active space debris removal—A preliminary mission analysis and design. Acta Astronaut. 69, 848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, F.F. 1990 Introduction to Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Vol. 1. Plenum, p. 329.Google Scholar
Chen, F.F. 2006 Physical mechanism of current-free double layers. Phys. Plasmas 13, 034502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delzanno, G.L. & Camporeale, E. 2013 On particle movers in cylindrical geometry for Particle-In-Cell simulations. J. Comput. Phys. 253, 259–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dov, G. 2020 Space debris puts exploration at risk. Science 370 (6519), 922.Google Scholar
Ebersohn, F.H., Sheehan, J.P. & Gallimore, A.D. 2015 34th International Electric Propulsion Conference, Hyogo-Kobe, Japan, IEPC-2015-357/ISTS-2015-b-357.Google Scholar
Ebersohn, F.H., Sheehan, J.P., Gallimore, A.D. & Shebalin, J.V. 2017 Kinetic simulation technique for plasma flow in strong external magnetic field. J. Comput. Phys. 351, 358–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frignani, M. & Grasso, G. 2006 Argon cross sections for PIC-MCC codes. LIN-r01.Google Scholar
Fruchtman, A. 2006 Electric field in a double layer and the imparted momentum. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 065002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goebel, D.M. & Katz, I. 2008 Fundamentals of Electric Propulsion: Ion and Hall Thrusters. John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hockney, R.W. & Eastwood, J.W. 1981 Computer Simulation Using Particles. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Jackson, J.D. 1991 Classical Electrodynamics. Wiley.Google Scholar
Kitamura, S., Hayakawa, Y. & Kawamoto, S. 2014 A re-orbiter for large GEO debris objects using ion beam irradiation. Acta Astronaut. 94, 725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurance, M.R. & Brownlee, D.E. 1986 The flux of meteoroids and orbital space debris striking satellites in low Earth orbit. Nature 323, 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liou, J.C. & Johnson, N.L. 2006 Risks in space from orbiting debris. Science 311, 340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meige, A., Boswell, R.W. & Charles, C. 2005 One-dimensional particle-in-cell simulation of a current-free double layer in an expanding plasma. Phys. Plasmas 12, 052317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishida, S., Kawamoto, S., Okawa, Y., Terui, F. & Kitamura, S. 2009 Space debris removal system using a small satellite. Acta Astronaut. 65, 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peter, C. 1988 Dangers of more debris in space. Nature 334, 644.Google Scholar
Qin, H., Zhang, S., Xiao, J., Liu, J., Sun, Y. & Tang, W.M. 2013 Why is Boris algorithm so good? Phys. Plasma 20, 084503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubenchik, A.M., Fedoruk, M.P. & Turitsyn, S.K. 2014 The effect of self-focusing on laser space-debris cleaning. Light 3, e159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saini, V. & Ganesh, R. 2020 Double layer formation and thrust generation in an expanding plasma using 1D-3 V PIC simulation. Phys. Plasmas 27, 093505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saini, V., Pandey, S.K., Trivedi, P. & Ganesh, R. 2018 Coherent phase space structures in a 1D electrostatic plasma using particle-in-cell and Vlasov simulations: a comparative study. Phys. Plasmas 25, 092107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shan, M., Guo, J. & Gill, E. 2015 Review and comparison of active space debris capturing and removal methods. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 80, 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shan, M., Guo, J. & Gill, E. 2017 Deployment dynamics of tethered-net for space debris removal. Acta Astronaut. 132, 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheehan, J.P., Longmier, B.W., Bering, E.A., Olsen, C.S., Squire, J.P., Ballenger, M.G., Carter, M.D., Cassady, L.D., Chang Diaz, F.R., Glover, T.W., et al. 2014 Temperature gradients due to adiabatic plasma expansion in a magnetic nozzle. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 23, 045014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, K. 2019 Helicon-type radio-frequency plasma thrusters and magnetic plasma nozzles. Rev. Mod. Plasma Phys. 3, Article number: 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, K. 2021 Magnetic nozzle radio-frequency plasma thruster approaching twenty percent thruster efficiency. Sci. Rep. 11, 2768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, K., Charles, C. & Boswell, R.W. 2013 Approaching the theoretical limit of diamagnetic-induced momentum in a rapidly diverging magnetic nozzle. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 195003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, K., Charles, C., Boswell, R. & Ando, A. 2018 a Adiabatic expansion of electron gas in a magnetic nozzle. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 045001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, K., Charles, C., Boswell, R.W. & Ando, A. 2018 b Demonstrating a new technology for space debris removal using a bi-directional plasma thruster. Sci. Rep. 8, 14417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takahashi, K., Charles, C., Boswell, R.W. & Ando, A. 2020 Thermodynamic analogy for electrons interacting with a magnetic nozzle. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 165001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takahashi, K., Lafleur, T., Charles, C., Alexander, P. & Boswell, R.W. 2011 Electron diamagnetic effect on axial force in an expanding plasma: experiments and theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 235001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, K., Shida, Y. & Fujiwara, T. 2010 Magnetic-field-induced enhancement of ion beam energy in a magnetically expanding plasma using permanent magnets. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 19, 025004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, K., Sugawara, T. & Ando, A. 2020 Spatial measurement of axial and radial momentum fluxes of a plasma expanding in a magnetic nozzle. New J. Phys. 22, 073034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, K., Takao, Y. & Ando, A. 2016 Modifications of plasma density profile and thrust by neutral injection in a helicon plasma thruster. Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 194101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takao, Y. & Takahashi, K. 2015 Numerical validation of axial plasma momentum lost to a lateral wall induced by neutral depletion. Phys. Plasmas 22, 113509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vahedi, V. & Surendra, M. 1995 A Monte Carlo collision model for the particle-in-cell method: applications to argon and oxygen discharges. Comp. Phys. Commun. 87, 179–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verboncoeur, J.P., Alves, M.V., Vahedi, V. & Birdsall, C.K. 1993 Simultaneous potential and circuit solution for 1D bounded plasma particle simulation codes. J. Comput. Phys. 104, 321–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar