Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T15:57:35.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Non-inductive current drive via helicity injection by Alfvén waves in low-aspect-ratio tokamaks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

S. Cuperman ,
C. Bruma  and
K. Komoshvili
S. Cuperman
Affiliation:
School of Physics and Astronomy, Raymond and Beverly Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
C. Bruma
Affiliation:
School of Physics and Astronomy, Raymond and Beverly Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
K. Komoshvili
Affiliation:
School of Physics and Astronomy, Raymond and Beverly Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A theoretical investigation of radio-frequency (RF) current drive via helicity injection in low aspect ratio tokamaks is carried out. A current-carrying cylindrical plasma surrounded by a helical sheet-current antenna and situated inside a perfectly conducting shell is considered. Toroidal features of low-aspect-ratio tokamaks are simulated by incorporating the following effects: (i) arbitrarily small aspect ratio, Ro/a ≡1/∈; (ii) strongly sheared equilibrium magnetic field; and (iii) relatively large poloidal component of the equilibrium magnetic field. This study concentrates on the Alfvén continuum, i.e. the case in which the wave frequency satisfies the condition , where is an eigenfrequency of the shear Alfven wave (SAW). Thus, using low-β magneto- hydrodynamics, the wave equation with correct boundary (matching) conditions is solved, the RF field components are found, and subsequently current drive, power deposition and efficiency are computed. The results of our investigation clearly demonstrate the possibility of generation of RF-driven currents via helicity injection by Alfvén waves in low-aspect-ratio tokamaks, in the SAW mode. A special algorithm is developed that enables one to select the antenna parameters providing optimal current drive efficiency.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 56 , Issue 1 , August 1996 , pp. 149 - 174
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appert, K. & Vaclavik, J. 1983 Plasma Phys. 25, (5) 551.Google Scholar
Belyakov, V. A., Bender, S. E., Kavin, A. A. et al. Plasma performance, equilibrium and stability in spherical tokamak GLOBUS 1993. Private Communication.Google Scholar
Braginskii, S. I. 1964 Reviews of Plasma Physics (ed. Leontovich, M. A.), Vol. 1, p. 205Consultants Bureau, New-York.Google Scholar
Bruhns, H., Brendel, R., Raupp, G. & Steiger, J. 1987 Nucl. Fusion 21, 2178.Google Scholar
Chan, V. S., Miller, R. L. & Ohkawa, T. 1990 Phys. Fluids B2, 1441.Google Scholar
Elfimov, A. G., Petrzilka, V. & Tataronis, J. A. 1994 Phys. Plasma 1, 2882.Google Scholar
Finkental, M. & Rosenblum, M. 1993 SARIT: Small Aspect Ratio Israeli Tokamak. Private communicationGoogle Scholar
Freidberg, J. P 1987 Ideal Magneto-Hydrodynamics. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, A., Itoh, K., Itoh, S.-I. & Hamamatsu, K. 1993 Phys. Fluids B5, 539.Google Scholar
Ohkawa, T. 1989 Comments Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion, 12. 165.Google Scholar
Peng, Y.-K. M. 1985 Spherical torus compact fusion at low field. ORNL/FEDC-84/7.Google Scholar
Peng, Y-K. M. & Strickler, D. J. 1986 Nucl. Fusion 26, 769.Google Scholar
Sykes, A., Bosco, del E. & Colchin, R. J. 1992 Nucl. Fusion 32, 694.Google Scholar
Tataronis, J. A. & Moroz, P. E. 1991 Helicity injection and fast wave current drive in scale tokamaks. Proceedings IAEA Technical Committee Meeting on Fast Current Drive in Reactor Scale Tokamaks, Arles, France, p. 167. Ass. EURATOM-CEA.Google Scholar
Villard, L., Appert, K., Gruber, R. & Vaclavik, J. 1986 Comput. Phys. Rep. 4, 95.Google Scholar