Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:57:05.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New classes of three-dimensional ideal-MHD equilibria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 1997

R. KAISER
Affiliation:
Universität Bayreuth, Lehrstuhl für Angewandte Mathematik, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany
A. SALAT
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, Euratom Association, Boltzmannstrasse 2, 85748 Garching bei München, Germany

Abstract

Six ansatzes are investigated for their potential to allow three-dimensional (3D) ideal magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) equilibria. The ansatzes are based on a Clebsch representation for the magnetic field, B=∇H × ∇k, and a ‘generalized Clebsch representation’, B=∇×(∇K × ∇k), with ∇k being one of the coordinate directions of a cylindrical coordinate system. Three classes of equilibria, all with a straight magnetic axis, are obtained. Equilibria of the first class have a purely poloidal magnetic field of the Clebsch type with k=z and include the 3D equilibria already known. Equilibria of the other two classes have a purely toroidal (i.e. here longitudinal) magnetic field and pressure surfaces that can be chosen such that poloidal sections are closed. The second class is based on a Clebsch representation with k=θ. Solutions contain a free function of θ that determines the poloidal sections of the pressure surfaces at, say, z=0. The behaviour in the toroidal direction is then fixed but not periodic. For the third class, the generalized Clebsch representation with k=z is used. The equilibria are similar to those of the second class, with two important differences. They contain no free function and field lines are not planar. Finally, 3D vacuum fields, which exhibit 3D magnetic surfaces, are presented. They have the same geometry as the equilibria of the third class, and in fact can be obtained as a certain limit from these equilibria. Possible applications of the equilibria found are mentioned.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1997 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)