Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:18:57.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measurement of the electrical properties of a flowing plasma, including a critical comparison of probe experiment and theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

E. W. Billington
E. W. Billington
Affiliation:
Royal Armament Research and Development Establishment, Fort Halstead, Kent
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The primary quantities characterizing the electricaJ carriers of a flowing plasma in a low density wind tunnel have been determined from measurements using electrostatic probes immersed in the plasma. With the exception of the ion temperature, the plasma parameters have been obtained from the current—voltage characteristics of two types of single electrode probe. The probes consist of a cylinder, the major axis of which is aligned parallel to the flow of the plasma, and a disk, the exposed surface of which is normal to the direction of flow. Experiments with a double electrode probe consisting of a disk-shaped collector electrode which is screened from direct exposure to the plasma by a fine wire mesh, grid electrode, made it possible to obtain current—voltage characteristics with the ion and electron components separated from one another. From the current—voltage characteristic corresponding to collection of ions, using the screen grid probe, values of the ion temperature and drift velocity have been obtained. The measurements have been made at various points along the centre line of flow, for one particular value of the flow rate using argon as the test gas. For a given position of the probes, one value of the ion temperature has been evaluated, together with two independent values of each of the other primary quantities characterizing the electrical carriers of a flowing plasma. Each pair of values agree satisfactorily amongst themselves, good agreement being generally obtained between probe theory and experiment.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , May 1969 , pp. 161 - 178
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, J. E. & Thonemann, P. C. 1954 Proc. Phys. Soc. B 67, 768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, J. E., Boyd, R. L. F. & Reynolds, P. 1957 Proc. Phys. Soc. B 70, 297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohm, D., Burhop, E. H. S. & Massey, H. S. W. 1949 The Characteristics of Electrical Discharges in Magnetic Fields. Eds. Guthrie, A. and Wakening, R. K. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Bourdeau, R. E. & Donley, J. L. 1964 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 281, 487.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. L. F. 1950 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 201, 329.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. L. F. 1954 Rocket Exploration of the Upper Atmosphere, p. 336. London: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. L. F. & Thompson, J. B. 1959 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 252, 102.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. L. F. & Twiddy, N. D. 1959 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 250, 53.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. L. F. & Twiddy, N. D. 1960 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 259, 145.Google Scholar
Chen, F. F. 1965 Plasma Diagnostic Techniques, p. 113. Eds. Huddllestone, R. H. and Leonard, S. L. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Clayden, W. A. 1961 Rarefied Gas Dynamics, pp. 715–40. Ed., Talbot, L. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Clayden, W. A. 1963 Rarefied Gas Dynamics, vol. II, pp. 435–70. Ed. Laurman, J. A. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Clayden, W. A. 1964 The High Temperature Aspects of Hypersonic Flow, pp. 419–47. Ed., Nelson, W. C. London: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Druyvesteyn, M. J. 1930 Z. Phys. 64, 790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heatley, A. H. 1937 Phys. Rev. 52, 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, E. O. & Malter, L. 1950 Phys. Rev. 80, 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langmuir, I. & Mott-Smith, H. M. 1924 Gen. Elect. Rev. 27, 449, 538, 616, 762, 810.Google Scholar
Mott-Smith, H. M. & Langmuir, I. 1926 Phys. Rev. 28, 727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, G. J. & Brown, S. C. 1955 Phys. Rev. 98, 1642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonks, L. & Langmuir, I. 1929 Phys. Rev. 34, 876.Google Scholar
Wenzel, F. 1950 Z. Angew. Phys. 2, 59.Google Scholar
Whipple, E. C. 1959 Proc. I.R.E. 47, 2023.Google Scholar