Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T00:40:21.556Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Low-frequency fluctuations in scrape-off layer of tokamak plasma with limiter biasing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2011

N. BISAI ,
RAMESWAR SINGH  and
R. SINGH
N. BISAI
Affiliation:
Institute for Plasma Research, Bhat, Gandhinagar 382 428, India ([email protected])
RAMESWAR SINGH
Affiliation:
Institute for Plasma Research, Bhat, Gandhinagar 382 428, India ([email protected])
R. SINGH
Affiliation:
Institute for Plasma Research, Bhat, Gandhinagar 382 428, India ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effects of limiter biasing on the equilibrium density and potential profiles of the scrape-off layer (SOL) in tokamak plasma are investigated by including ionization and cross-field mobility. It is shown that a broadening of SOL can take place by the inclusion of ionization for low negative biasing. Various microinstabilities relevant for SOL plasmas have been studied. Generalized low-frequency dispersion relation is derived. It is shown that limiter biasing significantly modifies the SOL fluctuations. It is also shown that growth rate of conductive wall instability is smaller for negative biasing than positive biasing case. New mode, the modified Simon–Hoh, and ion temperature gradient instabilities are found to contribute significantly to the growth of curvature- and electron temperature-gradient-driven conductive wall instabilities.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 77 , Issue 6 , December 2011 , pp. 733 - 748
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Tayor, J. B., Brown, M. L., Fried, B. D. and Grate, H. 1989 Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 2365.Google Scholar
[2]Wagner, F., Becker, G., Behringer, K. and Campbell, D. 1982 Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Ghendrih, Ph., Sarazin, Y., Attuel, G. et al. 2003 Nucl. Fusion 43, 1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Shoji, T., Aikawa, H., Annaratone, B. M. et al. 1993 Divertor bisas experiment on JET-2M. In: Proc. Fourteenth Int. Conf. Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research, Würzburg, Germany, 30 September–7 October 1992, vol. 1 (ed. Editorial staff of IAEA). Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research 1992, IAEA-CN-56/A-5-5, pp. 323–327.Google Scholar
[5]Takamura, S., Kinoshita, S. and Uesugi, Y. 1991 IEEE 19, 885.Google Scholar
[6]Phillips, P. E., Wooten, A. J., Rowan, R. W., Ritz, C. P. et al. 1987 J. Nucl. Mater. 145–147, 807.Google Scholar
[7]Lachambre, J. L., Quirion, B., Boucher, C., Decoste, R. et al. 1994 Nucl. Fusion 34, 1431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Nedospasov, V. 1989 Sov. J. Plasma Phys. 15, 659.Google Scholar
[9]Berk, H. L., Ryutov, D. D. and Tsidulko, Yu. 1991 Phys. Fluids B3, 1346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Berk, H. L., Cohen, R. H., Ryutov, D. D., Tsidulko, Yu. A. and Xu, X. Q. 1993 Nucl. Fusion 33, 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Rozhansky, V. and Tendler, M. 1994 Phys. Plasmas 1, 2711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]LaBombard, R. W. C. and Tynan, G. 1990 Plasma. Phys. Contr. Fusion 32, 383.Google Scholar
[13]LaBombard, B. 1990 Nucl. Fusion 30, 485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Chakrabarti, N., Das, A., Deshpande, S., Kaw, P. K., Mahajan, S., Sen, A. and Singh, R. 1995 Physics of SOL/EDGE Turbulence Phenomena in tokamaks. In: Proc. Fifteenth Int. Conf. Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research, Seville, Spain, 26 September–1 October 1994, vol. 3 (ed. Editorial Staff of IAEA). Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research 1994, IAEA-CN-60/D-9, pp. 289–298.Google Scholar
[15]Sakawa, Y., Joshi, C., Kaw, P. K., Chen, F. F. and Jain, V. K. 1993 Phys. Fluids B 5, 1681.Google Scholar
[16]Jacob, S., Jain, K. K., Mahajan, S., Saxena, Y. C., Sen, A. K. and Singh, R. 1995 Fluctuation supression by bias electrod induced poloidal flow and feedback in a toroidal plasma. In: Proc. Fifteenth Int. Conf. Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research, Seville, Spain, 26 September–1 October 1994, vol. 2 (ed. Editorial Staff of IAEA). Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research 1994, IAEA-CN-60/A3/A5-P16, pp. 295–302.Google Scholar
[17]Hazeltine, R. D., Xiao, H. and Valanju, P. M. 1993 Phys. Fluids B 5, 4011.Google Scholar
[18]Braginskii, S. I. 1965 Review of Plasma Physics, Vol. 1. New York: Consultant Bureau.Google Scholar
[19]Singh, R., Kaw, P. K. and Mahajan, S. 1996 Plasma. Phys. Contr. Fusion 38, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Sarazin, Y. and Ghendrih, Ph. 1998 Phys. Plasmas 5, 4214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Bisai, N., Das, A., Deshpande, S., Jha, R., Kaw, P., Sen, A. and Singh, R. 2004 Phys. Plasmas 11, 4018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Garbet, X., Laurent, L., Roubin, J.-P. and Samain, A. 1991 Nucl. Fusion 31, 967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar