Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:26:43.632Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ideal magnetohydrodynamic equilibria with helical symmetry and incompressible flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 1999

G. N. THROUMOULOPOULOS
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association, D-85748 Garching, Germany Permanent address: Section of Theoretical Physics, Physics Department, University of Ioannina GR 451 10 Ioannina, Greece.
H. TASSO
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association, D-85748 Garching, Germany

Abstract

A recent study on axisymmetric ideal magnetohydrodynamic equilibria with incompressible flows [H. Tasso and G. N. Throumoulopoulos, Phys. Plasmas5, 2378 (1998)] is extended to the generic case of helically symmetric equilibria with incompressible flows. It is shown that the equilibrium states of the system under consideration are governed by an elliptic partial differential equation for the helical magnetic flux function containing five surface quantities along with a relation for the pressure. The above-mentioned equation can be transformed to one possessing a differential part identical in form to the corresponding static equilibrium equation, which is amenable to several classes of analytical solutions. In particular, equilibria with electric fields perpendicular to the magnetic surfaces and non-constant-Mach-number flows are constructed. Unlike the case in axisymmetric equilibria with isothermal magnetic surfaces, helically symmetric T = T(ψ) equilibria are overdetermined, i.e. in this case the equilibrium equations reduce to a set of eight ordinary differential equations with seven surface quantities. In addition, the non-existence is proved of incompressible helically symmetric equilibria with (a) purely helical flows and (b) non-parallel flows with isothermal magnetic surfaces and with the magnetic field modulus a surface quantity (omnigenous equilibria).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)