Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T13:40:44.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The generation of interpenetrating plasma flows in an expanding discharge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

H. A. Davis
Affiliation:
Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
M. A. Mahdavi
Affiliation:
Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
R. H. Lovberg
Affiliation:
Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California

Abstract

We report on an experiment designed to study collisionless shock waves in an inverse pinch discharge using argon. A magnetic disturbance was generated which propagated ahead of the driving field at twice the piston speed. Measurements of the magnetic and electric field structures, electron density and temperature, as well as ion velocities revealed that the disturbance was produced by a beam of plasma moving through the ionized ambient plasma rather than by a true shock wave. Calculations of ion trajectories using measured electric fields demonstrated that the beam originated at small radii and early times, and was not the result of a steady specular reflexion from the piston field. It is concluded that the ions comprising this stream, which were collisionless relative to the ambient ions, did not couple to the background plasma even though a strong magnetic field was applied.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bogen, P. et al. 1971 4th IAEA Conf. on Plasma Physics and Fusion Research, Madison, 3, 277.Google Scholar
Brown, S. C. 1966 Basic Data of Plasma Physics, p. 143. London: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Davis, W. D. 1971 4th IAEA Conf. on Plasma Physics and Fusion Research, Madison, 3, 289.Google Scholar
Dean, S. O., McLean, E. A., Stamper, J. A. & Griem, R. 1971 Phys. Rev. Lett. 27,487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dove, W. F. 1971 Phys. Fluids 14, 2359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keilhacker, M. et al. 1971. 4th. IAEA Conf. on Plasma Physics and Fusion Research, Madison, 3, 265.Google Scholar
Moore, C. E. 1959 A Multiplet Table of Astrophysical Interest. Technical Note 30 (N.B.S. Washington, D.C.), p. 23.Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, K. C., Davidson, R. C., Dawson, J. M., Haber, I., Hammer, D. A., Krall, N.A. & Shanny, R. 1971 Phys. Fluids 14, 849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, J. W. M. et al. 1971. 4th IAEA Conf. on Plasma Physics and Fusion Research, Madison, 3, 251, 261.Google Scholar
Rosenbluth, M. 1957 Magnetohydrodynamics (ed. Landshoff, R. K. M.), p. 57. Stanford University Press, Stanford.Google Scholar
Stringer, T. E. 1963 Plasma Physics, 6, 267.Google Scholar
Wright, T. P. 1972 Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 268.Google Scholar