Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:35:20.396Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electrogravitational instability of an annular fluid jet coaxial with a very dense fluid cylinder under radial varying fields

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

Ahmed E. Radwan
Ahmed E. Radwan
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Ain-Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The electrodynamic instability of a self-gravitating dielectric annular fluid jet possessing a very dense fluid (of negligible inertia) cylinder mantle surrounded by another dielectric self-gravitating medium pervaded by a radial varying electric field is investigated. A general eigenvalue relation valid for all possible symmetric m = 0 and asymmetric m ≠ 0 perturbation modes is derived and discussed. The electrodynamic force has a strong destabilizing influence not only to m = 0 but also to m ≠ 0 disturbance modes. The self-gravitational force is stabilizing to all pure m ≠ 0 modes, while to m = 0 it is stabilizing or destabilizing according to conditions. The destabilizing effects of the internal and exterior varying electric fields shrink the gravitationally stable states and simultaneously increase the unstable ones. The electrogravitodynamic instability character of the model can be minimized if the electrodynamic force effect is extremely small in comparison with that of the self-gravitational force, but the instability will never be suppressed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , December 1990 , pp. 455 - 465
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abouelmagd, A. A. & Nayyar, N. K. 1970 J. Phys. A3, 296.Google Scholar
Abouelmagd, A. A. & Nayyar, N. K. 1983 Arabian Sci. Engng. 8, 103.Google Scholar
Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I. 1970 Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover.Google Scholar
Chandrasekhar, S. 1961 Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability. Clarendon.Google Scholar
Drazin, P. G. & Reid, W. H. 1981 Hydrodynamic Stability. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elshehaway, E. F. et al. 1985 Nuovo Cim. 6D, 291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elshehaway, E. F. et al. 1986 Q. Appl. Maths, 43, 483.Google Scholar
Kendall, J. M. 1986 Phys. Fluids, 29, 2086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohamed, A. A. et al. 1985 a Phys. Scr. 31, 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohamed, A. A. et al. 1985 b J. Math. Phys. 26, 2072.Google Scholar
Mohamed, A. A. et al. 1986 J. Chem. Phys. 85, 445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plateau, J. A. 1873 Statique expérimental et théorique des liquides soumis aux seules forces moléculaires. Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
Radwan, A. E. 1988 Indian J. Pure Appl. Maths, 19, 1105.Google Scholar
Radwan, A. E. 1989 a Nuovo Cim. 103, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radwan, A. E. 1989 b J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 58, 113.Google Scholar
Rayleigh, J. W. 1945 The Theory of Sound. Dover.Google Scholar
Roberts, P. H. 1967 An Introduction to MHD. Longman.Google Scholar
Woodson, H. H. & Melcher, J. R. 1968 Electromechanical Dynamics. Wiley.Google Scholar