Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:48:34.556Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of viscosity and resistivity on Rayleigh–Taylor instability induced mixing in magnetized high-energy-density plasmas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2022

Ratan Kumar Bera*
Affiliation:
Kevin T. Crofton Department of Aerospace and Ocean Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
Yang Song
Affiliation:
Kevin T. Crofton Department of Aerospace and Ocean Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
Bhuvana Srinivasan
Affiliation:
Kevin T. Crofton Department of Aerospace and Ocean Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
*
Email addresses for correspondence: [email protected], [email protected]

Abstract

This work numerically investigates the role of viscosity and resistivity in Rayleigh–Taylor instabilities in magnetized high-energy-density (HED) plasmas for a high Atwood number and high plasma beta regimes surveying across plasma beta and magnetic Prandtl numbers. The numerical simulations are performed using the visco-resistive magnetohydrodynamic equations. Results presented here show that the inclusion of self-consistent viscosity and resistivity in the system drastically changes the growth of the Rayleigh–Taylor instability (RTI) as well as modifies its internal structure at smaller scales. It is seen here that the viscosity has a stabilizing effect on the RTI. Moreover, the viscosity inhibits the development of small-scale structures and also modifies the morphology of the tip of the RTI spikes. On the other hand, the resistivity reduces the magnetic field stabilization, supporting the development of small-scale structures. The morphology of the RTI spikes is seen to be unaffected by the presence of resistivity in the system. An additional novelty of this work is in the disparate viscosity and resistivity profiles that may exist in HED plasmas and their impact on RTI growth, morphology and the resulting turbulence spectra. Furthermore, this work shows that the dynamics of the magnetic field is independent of viscosity and likewise the resistivity does not affect the dissipation of enstrophy and kinetic energy. In addition, power law scalings of enstrophy, kinetic energy and magnetic field energy are provided in both the injection range and inertial sub-range, which could be useful for understanding RTI induced turbulent mixing in HED laboratory and astrophysical plasmas and could aid in the interpretation of observations of RTI-induced turbulence spectra.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, C.S., Moser, A.L. & Hsu, S.C. 2015 Observation of Rayleigh–Taylor-instability evolution in a plasma with magnetic and viscous effects. Phys. Rev. E 92 (5), 051101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atzeni, S. & Meyer-ter Vehn, J. 2004 The Physics of Inertial Fusion: Beam Plasma Interaction, Hydrodynamics, Hot Dense Matter, vol. 125. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betti, R., Goncharov, V., McCrory, R. & Verdon, C. 1998 Growth rates of the ablative Rayleigh–Taylor instability in inertial confinement fusion. Phys. Plasmas 5 (5), 14461454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biskamp, D. & Schwarz, E. 2001 On two-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic turbulence. Phys. Plasmas 8 (7), 32823292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braginskii, S. 1965 Transport processes in a plasma. Rev. Plasma Phys. 1, 205311.Google Scholar
Burton, G.C. 2011 Study of ultrahigh Atwood-number Rayleigh–Taylor mixing dynamics using the nonlinear large-eddy simulation method. Phys. Fluids 23 (4), 045106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabot, W.H. & Cook, A.W. 2006 Reynolds number effects on Rayleigh–Taylor instability with possible implications for type Ia supernovae. Nat. Phys. 2 (2), 562568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandrasekhar, S. 1961 Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability. Dover Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Dedner, A., Kemm, F., Kröner, D., Munz, C.-D., Schnitzer, T. & Wesenberg, M. 2002 Hyperbolic divergence cleaning for the MHD equations. J. Comput. Phys. 175 (2), 645673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimonte, G., Ramaprabhu, P., Youngs, D.L., Andrews, M.J. & Rosner, R. 2005 Recent advances in the turbulent Rayleigh–Taylor instability. Phys. Plasmas 12 (5), 056301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamezo, V.N., Khokhlov, A.M., Oran, E.S., Chtchelkanova, A.Y. & Rosenberg, R.O. 2003 Thermonuclear supernovae: simulations of the deflagration stage and their implications. Science 299 (5603), 7781, https://science.sciencemag.org/content/299/5603/77.full.pdf.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hester, J.J. 2008 The crab nebula: an astrophysical chimera. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 46 (1), 127155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesthaven, J.S. & Warburton, T. 2007 Nodal Discontinuous Galerkin Methods: Algorithms, Analysis, and Applications. Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Hwang, U., Laming, M., Badenes, C., Berendse, F., Blondin, J., Cioffi, D., DeLaney, T., Dewey, D., Fesen, R., Flanagan, K. A., et al. 2004 A Million-second Chandra view of Cassiopeia A. Astrophys. J. Lett. 615, L117L120, arXiv:astro-ph/0409760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jukes, J. 1963 On the Rayleigh–Taylor problem in magneto-hydrodynamics with finite resistivity. J. Fluid Mech. 16 (2), 177186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jun, B.-I. & Norman, M.L. 1996 On the origin of radial magnetic fields in young supernova remnants. Astrophys. J. 472 (1), 245256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaus, B.J.P. & Becker, T.W. 2007 Effects of elasticity on the Rayleigh–Taylor instability: implications for large-scale geodynamics. Geophys. J. Intl 168 (2), 843862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kifonidis, K., Plewa, T., Janka, H.-Th. & Müller, E. 2003 Non-spherical core collapse supernovae – I. Neutrino-driven convection, Rayleigh–Taylor instabilities, and the formation and propagation of metal clumps. Astron. Astrophys. 408 (2), 621649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulsrud, R., Cen, R., Ostriker, J. & Ryu, D. 1997 The protogalactic origin for cosmic magnetic fields. Astrophys. J. 480, 481491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuranz, C.C., Drake, R.P., Grosskopf, M.J., Fryxell, B., Budde, A., Hansen, J.F., Miles, A.R., Plewa, T., Hearn, N. & Knauer, J. 2010 Spike morphology in blast-wave-driven instability experiments. Phys. Plasmas 17 (5), 052709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loll, A.M., Desch, S.J., Scowen, P.A. & Foy, J.P. 2013 Observations of the Crab Nebula asymmetrical development. Astrophys. J. 765 (2), 152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyubimova, T., Vorobev, A. & Prokopev, S. 2019 Rayleigh–Taylor instability of a miscible interface in a confined domain. Phys. Fluids 31 (1), 014104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menikoff, R., Mjolsness, R., Sharp, D. & Zemach, C. 1977 Unstable normal mode for Rayleigh–Taylor instability in viscous fluids. Phys. Fluids 20 (12), 20002004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modica, F., Plewa, T. & Zhiglo, A. 2013 The Braginskii model of the Rayleigh–Taylor instability. I. Effects of self-generated magnetic fields and thermal conduction in two dimensions. High Energy Density Phys. 9 (4), 767780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munz, C.-D., Omnes, P. & Schneider, R. 2001 A Godunov-type solver for the Maxwell equations with divergence cleaning. In Godunov Methods (ed. Toro, E. F.), pp. 647–654. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0663-8_64Google Scholar
Orszag, S.A. & Tang, C.-M. 1979 Small-scale structure of two-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 90 (1), 129143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayleigh, 1882 Investigation of the character of the equilibrium of an incompressible heavy fluid of variable density. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society s1-14 (1), 170177. https://doi.org/10.1112/plms/s1-14.1.170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remington, B.A., Drake, R.P. & Ryutov, D.D. 2006 Experimental astrophysics with high power lasers and $z$ pinches. Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 755807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauppe, J.P., Palaniyappan, S., Loomis, E.N., Kline, J.L., Flippo, K.A. & Srinivasan, B. 2019 Using cylindrical implosions to investigate hydrodynamic instabilities in convergent geometry. Matter Radiat. Extremes 4 (6), 065403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silveira, F.E.M. & Orlandi, H.I. 2017 Viscous-resistive layer in Rayleigh–Taylor instability. Phys. Plasmas 24 (3), 032112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, Y. 2020 Unstructured nodal discontinuous Galerkin method for convection-diffusion equations applied to neutral fluids and plasmas. PhD thesis, Virginia Tech.Google Scholar
Song, Y. & Srinivasan, B. 2020 A survey of the effects of magnetic fields, resistivity, viscosity and thermal conduction on the Rayleigh–Taylor instability. Radiat. Effects Defects Solids 175, 10091014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, Y. & Srinivasan, B. 2021 An efficient reconstruction algorithm for diffusion on triangular grids using the nodal discontinuous Galerkin method. Comput. Phys. Commun. 264, 107873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srinivasan, B., Cagas, P., Masti, R., Rathod, C., Shetty, R. & Song, Y. 2019 A survey of fluid and kinetic instabilities relevant to space and laboratory plasmas. Radiat. Effects Defects Solids 174 (1–2), 3145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srinivasan, B., Cagas, P., Masti, R., Rathod, C. & Song, Y. 2017 Fluid and kinetic simulations of plasma instabilities. Radiat. Effects Defects Solids 172 (9–10), 723727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srinivasan, B., Dimonte, G. & Tang, X.-Z. 2012 Magnetic field generation in Rayleigh–Taylor unstable inertial confinement fusion plasmas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (16), 165002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Srinivasan, B. & Tang, X.-Z. 2012 Mechanism for magnetic field generation and growth in Rayleigh–Taylor unstable inertial confinement fusion plasmas. Phys. Plasmas 19 (8), 082703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srinivasan, B. & Tang, X.-Z. 2014 a Mitigating hydrodynamic mix at the gas-ice interface with a combination of magnetic, ablative, and viscous stabilization. Europhys. Lett. 107 (6), 65001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srinivasan, B. & Tang, X.-Z. 2014 b Role of hydrodynamic instability growth in hot-spot mass gain and fusion performance of inertial confinement fusion implosions. Phys. Plasmas 21 (10), 102704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, J.M. & Gardiner, T. 2007 Nonlinear evolution of the magnetohydrodynamic Rayleigh–Taylor instability. Phys. Fluids 19 (9), 094104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Y.B., Gou, J.N. & Wang, C. 2021 Combined effects of viscosity and a vertical magnetic field on Rayleigh–Taylor instability. Phys. Plasmas 28 (9), 092707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabak, M., Munro, D.H. & Lindl, J.D. 1990 Hydrodynamic stability and the direct drive approach to laser fusion. Phys. Fluids B: Plasma Phys. 2 (5), 10071014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, G.I. 1950 The instability of liquid surfaces when accelerated in a direction perpendicular to their planes. I. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 201 (1065), 192196.Google Scholar
Wang, L., Ye, W., He, X., Wu, J., Fan, Z., Xue, C., Guo, H., Miao, W., Yuan, Y., Dong, J., et al. 2017 Theoretical and simulation research of hydrodynamic instabilities in inertial-confinement fusion implosions. Sci. China Phys. Mech. 60 (5), 055201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y. 2017 a Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov instability induced flow, turbulence, and mixing. I. Phys. Rep. 720–722, 1136.Google Scholar
Zhou, Y. 2017 b Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov instability induced flow, turbulence, and mixing. II. Phys. Rep. 723–725, 1160.Google Scholar
Zhou, Y., Clark, T.T., Clark, D.S., Gail Glendinning, S., Aaron Skinner, M., Huntington, C.M., Hurricane, O.A., Dimits, A.M. & Remington, B.A. 2019 Turbulent mixing and transition criteria of flows induced by hydrodynamic instabilities. Phys. Plasmas 26 (8), 080901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar