Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:39:30.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of self-fields effects in two-stream electromagnetically pumped FEL with ion-channel guiding and axial magnetic field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2011

S. SAVIZ ,
H. MEHDIAN ,
FARZIN M. AGHAMIR ,
M. GHORANNEVIS  and
A. A. ASHKARRAN
S. SAVIZ
Affiliation:
Plasma Physics Research Center, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
H. MEHDIAN
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Institute for Plasma Research, Tarbiat Moallem University, 49, Dr Mofatteh avenue, Tehran 15614, Iran.
FARZIN M. AGHAMIR
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Tehran, N. Kargar Ave, Tehran 14399, Iran.
M. GHORANNEVIS
Affiliation:
Plasma Physics Research Center, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
A. A. ASHKARRAN
Affiliation:
Plasma Physics Research Center, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A theory of two-stream free-electron laser in a combined electromagnetic wiggler and an ion-channel guiding is developed. In the analysis, the electron trajectories and the small signal gain are derived by considering the effects of self-fields. Numerical calculations show that there are seven group's trajectories rather than nine groups reported in Mehdian and Saviz (2010 Chin. Phys. B 19(1), 014214). The comparison of the normalized gains and their corresponding normalized frequencies by employing the axial magnetic field and ion-channel guiding, with and without self-fields, in FEL has been studied numerically. The results show that the normalized maximum gain in FEL with axial magnetic is larger than that for using ion-channel guiding except in small region, but the results for their corresponding normalized frequencies are opposite.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 77 , Issue 6 , December 2011 , pp. 765 - 776
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Roberson, C. W. and Sprangle, P. 1980 Phys. Fluids B 1 (1), 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Jaber, I. and Demokan, O. 1996 Phys. Plasmas 3 (11), 4190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Freund, H. P. and Sprangle, P. 1989 Phys. Rev. A 26, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Seo, Y. and Park, I. H. 1997 Phys. Plasmas 4 (11), 4176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]McNeil, B. W. J., Robb, G. R. and Poole, M. W. 2004 Phys. Rev. E 70, 035501(R).Google Scholar
[6]Freund, H. P., Douglas, D. and O'Shiea, P. G. 2003 Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 507, 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Wilhelmsson, H. 1991 Physica Scripta. 44, 603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Botton, M. and Ron, A. 1990 J. Appl. Phys. 67 (10), 6583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Mehdian, H. and Saviz, S. 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 (1), 014214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Takayama, K. and Hiramatsu, S. 1988 Phys. Rev. A 37, 173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Raghavi, A., De Ninno, G. and Mehdian, H. 2008 Nucl. Instrum. Methods A. 591, 338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Hwang, H. et al. 2002 Phy. Plasma 9 (3), 1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Jha, P. and Wurtele, J. S. 1993 Nucl. Instrum. Methods A. 331, 477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar