Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:37:00.046Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An approach to rapid plasma shape diagnostics in tokamaks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

D. K. Lee  and
Y. K. M. Peng
D. K. Lee
Affiliation:
Fusion Energy Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, U.S.A.
Y. K. M. Peng
Affiliation:
Fusion Energy Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A study is made of a diagnostic procedure which allows one to estimate the plasma boundary shape and location in a tokamak by using numerical values of the poloidal magnetic flux function ψ in the vicinity of the plasma. In the case of the Impurity Study Experiment (ISX-B) tokamak, the magnetic sensor coils located around the periphery of the vacuum chamber provide information on ∂BR/∂t and ∂Bz/∂t, which can be processed to obtain data on ψ (and ∂ψ/∂n) through the relation BR = - R-1∂ψ/∂Z and Bz = R-1∂ψ/∂R. This leads to a Cauchy boundary condition for the Grad-Shafranov equation Δ*ψ = 0 in the region between the contour of the sensor coil locations and the plasma boundary flux surface. Numerical equilibria calculated for the ISX-B with different shapes are used to simulate ψ data along the coil locations. Random errors are added to the data to test the efficacy of two different approaches: global fitting and local fitting. Reasonably accurate results are obtained by the method of global fitting of the boundary values, which is based on the expansion of ψ in terms of eigenfunctions of Δ*ψ = 0 in a toroidal ring co-ordinate system. This approach is found to permit a relatively large random error in poloidal B field values at the sensor coils and appears to have the potential of rapidly displaying the plasma shape and location.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , February 1981 , pp. 161 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I. A. 1965 Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. L. et al. 1977 Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research, Vienna, vol. 1, p. 317. IAEA.Google Scholar
Helton, F. J. & Wang, T. S. 1978 Nucl. Fusion, 18, 1523.Google Scholar
Maschke, E. K. 1973 Plasma Phys. 15, 535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzucato, E. 1975 Phys. Fluids, 18, 536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirin, A. A., Uman, M. F., Hartman, C. W. & Killeen, J. 1976 Lawrence Livermore Laboratory Report UCRL-52069.Google Scholar
Morse, P. M. & Feshbach, H. 1953 Methods of Theoretical Physics. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Okada, O., Bol, K., Dalhe, S., Maeda, H. & Okabayshi, M. 1979 Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 24, 932.Google Scholar
Robinson, D. C. & Wootton, A. J. 1978 Nucl. Fusion, 18, 1555.Google Scholar
Shafranov, V. D. 1960 Soviet Phys. JETP, 10, 775.Google Scholar
Strickler, D. J., Peng, Y.-K. M. & Swain, D. W. 1977 Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 22, 1158.Google Scholar
Swain, D. W., Peng, Y.-K. M., Murakami, M. & Berry, L. A. 1977 Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 22, 1158.Google Scholar
Swain, D. W., Bates, S., Neilson, G. H. & Peng, Y.-K. M. 1979 Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report ORNL/TM-7172.Google Scholar
Tucker, T. C., Cain, W. D., McNeill, D. H., Peng, Y-K. M. & Wing, W. R. 1977 Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 22, 1157.Google Scholar
Wang, T. S. 1979 General Atomic Company Report GA-A15183.Google Scholar
Wootton, A. J. 1978 Nuel. Fusion, 18, 1161.Google Scholar
Wootton, A. J. 1979 Nucl. Fusion, 19, 987.Google Scholar