Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T15:36:03.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

2-D model of the streamer zone of a leader

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2016

G. M. Milikh ,
A. V. Likhanskii ,
M. N. Shneider ,
A. Raina  and
A. George
G. M. Milikh*
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
A. V. Likhanskii
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA Applied Materials, Gloucester, MA 01930, USA
M. N. Shneider
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, NJ 08544, USA
A. Raina
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
A. George
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Formation of the streamer zone of a leader is an outstanding problem in the physics of electric discharges which is relevant to laboratory leaders, as well as to the leaders formed by lightning. Despite substantial progress in the theoretical understanding of this complicated phenomenon, significant puzzles, such as the low propagation velocity of a leader compared to the fast streamers, remain. The objective of this paper is to present 2-D plasma simulations of the formation and propagation of the streamer zone of a leader. In these simulations we will generate a group of streamers that propagate in a discharge gap while interacting with each other. It is shown that interaction between the streamers significantly reduces their propagation velocity. This explains why the leader, which consists of many streamers, is much slower than a single streamer formed in the same discharge gap. It is shown that the mean velocity suppression of the group of streamers is determined by the inter-streamer distance. The critical value of the packing factor of the streamers at which the interactions between them can be neglected, and thus the discussed process can be treated as caused by a single streamer, is obtained.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 82 , Issue 1 , February 2016 , 905820102
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arevalo, L., Cooray, V., Wu, D. & Jacobson, B. 2012 A new static calculation of the streamer region for long spark gaps. J. Electrostat. 70, 15–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babaeva, N. Yu. & Kushner, M. J. 2014 Interaction of multiple atmospheric-pressure micro- plasma jets in small arrays: $\text{He}/\text{O}_{2}$ into humid air. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 23, 015007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazelyan, E. M. & Raizer, Yu. P. 1998 Sparks Discharge. CRC Press.Google Scholar
Bazelyan, E. M., Raizer, Yu. P. & Aleksandrov, N. L. 2007 The effect of reduced air density on streamer-to-leader transition and on properties of long positive leader. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 40, 4134–4144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeuf, J. P. & Pitchford, L. C. 2005 Electrodynamic force and aerodynamic flow acceleration in surface dielectric barrier discharge. J. Appl. Phys. 97, 103307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonaventura, Z., Bourdon, A., Celestin, S. & Pasko, V. P. 2011 Electric field determination in streamer discharges in air at atmospheric pressure. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 20, 035012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonaventura, Z., Duarte, M., Bourdon, A. & Massot, M. 2012 Derivation of a merging condition for two interacting streamers in air. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 21, 052001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallimberti, I. 1979 The mechanism of long spark formation. J. Phys. (Paris) 40, 193–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallimberti, I., Bacchiega, G., Bondiou-Clergerie, A. & Lalande, P. 2002 Fundamental processes in long air gap discharges. C. R. Physique 3, 1335–1359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Likhanskii, A. V., Shneider, M. N., Macheret, S. O. & Miles, R. B. 2007 Modeling of dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators driven by repetitive nanosecond pulses. Phys. Plasmas 14, 073501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Likhanskii, A. V., Shneider, M. N., Macheret, S. O. & Miles, R. B. 2008 Modeling of dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators in air. J. Appl. Phys. 103, 053305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luque, A., Ebert, U. & Hundsdorfer, W. 2008 Interaction of streamer discharges in air and other oxygen-nitrogen mixtures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 075005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naidis, G. V. 1996 On streamer interaction in a pulsed positive corona discharge. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 29, 779–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naidis, G. V. 2009 Positive and negative streamers in air: velocity-diameter relation. Phys. Rev. E 79, 057401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Popov, N. A. 2009 Study of the formation and propagation of a leader channel in air. Plasma Phys. Rep. 35, 785–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shneider, M. N., Mokrov, M. S. & Milikh, G. M. 2012 Dynamic contraction of the positive column of a self-sustained glow discharge in molecular gas. Phys. Plasmas 19 (3), 033512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shneider, M. N., Mokrov, M. S. & Milikh, G. M. 2014 Dynamic contraction of the positive column of a self-sustained discharge in air flow. Phys. Plasmas 21, 032122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
da Silva, C. L. & Pasko, V. P. 2013 Dynamics of streamer-to-leader transition at reduced air densities and its implications for propagation of lightning leaders and gigantic jets. J. Geophys. Res. 118, 1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar