Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T13:49:27.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nexus between housing and pension policies in Singapore: measuring retirement adequacy of the Central Provident Fund

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2018

NGEE CHOON CHIA  and
ALBERT K.C. TSUI
NGEE CHOON CHIA
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, National University of Singapore (e-mail: [email protected])
ALBERT K.C. TSUI
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Empirically, in many developed countries, homeownership rises with age. Both housing wealth and financial wealth affect retirement adequacy. Focusing replacement rates based on pension incomes alone may detract from the full retirement adequacy picture, as homeowners do not pay rent and hence need less cash. This paper adopts a wider perspective of retirement adequacy and includes net imputed rents in the calculation of replacement rates to gauge retirement adequacy. Including net imputed rents in replacement rates calculation is particularly important for Singapore, given the prevalence of house ownership, made possible by the nexus between retirement and housing policies. Workers can use part of the monthly contributions to Singapore's central provident fund to finance housing. While this would tradeoff retirement savings, it boosts spendable income for home-owning retirees. It is found that incorporating net imputed rent in the computation of replacement rates boosts the replacement rates by 12 percentage points for a male median worker and by 15 percentage points for female median workers.

Keywords

Replacement ratesnet imputed rentdefined contributionretirement adequacy
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Pension Economics & Finance , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , April 2019 , pp. 304 - 330
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We thank the editors and the anonymous referees for their many helpful comments and suggestions. Special thanks to Mike Orszag for his constructive comments. We like to acknowledge the Singapore Ministry of Manpower and the Central Provident Fund for the use of data in this study.

References

Andrews, D., Caldera Sánchez, A., and Johansson, Å. (2011) Housing markets and structural policies in OECD countries. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 836, OECD Publishing. Available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5kgk8t2k9vf3-en.Google Scholar
Biggs, A. G. and Schieber, S. (2014) Is there a retirement crisis? National Affairs. Available online at http://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/is-there-a-retirement-crisis (accessed 10 January 2015).Google Scholar
Biggs, A. G. and Springstead, G. R. (2008) Alternative measures of replacement rates for social security benefits and retirement income. Social Security Bulletin, 68(2): 1–19.Google Scholar
Brady, P. (2010) Measuring retirement resource adequacy. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 9(2): 235–262.Google Scholar
Brady, P. (2014) Unconventional wisdom on retirement preparedness. Available online at http://www.ici.org/viewpoints/view_14_four_studies (accessed 10 January 2015).Google Scholar
Calvo, J. L., Sanchez, C., and Cortinas, P. (2010) Joint estimation of the characteristics and intensity of povery in Spain: the case of imputed rent. Economics Research International, Article ID8 54634, Vol. 2010, pp. 17.Google Scholar
Chia, N. C. (2015) Central Provident Fund, Singapore Chronicles. Singapore: Published by Singapore Institute of Public Studies and the Straits Times Press, ISBN 978-981-4747-25-7.Google Scholar
Cronin, J. A. (1999) U.S. treasury distributional analysis methodology. U.S. Department of Treasury, OTA Paper 85, September 1999.Google Scholar
Haas, P., Hickey, R., Lubell, J., and Morse, S. (2012) Losing ground: the struggle of moderate-income households to afford the rising cost of housing and transportation. Report by the Center of Housing Policy and Center for Neighborhood Technology, United States.Google Scholar
Hui, W. T. (2012) Macroeconomic trends and labour welfare: a focus on retirement adequacy. Paper presented at the Singapore Perspectives 2012: Singapore Inclusive: Bridging Divides. Conference organized by the Institute of Policy Studies on 16 January 2012.Google Scholar
MacDonald, B. J. and Moore, K. D. (2011) Moving beyond the limitations of traditional replacement rates. Society of Actuaries, USA. Available online at http://www.soa.org/research/research-projects/pension/default.aspx.Google Scholar
McGill, D. M., Brown, K. N., Haley, J. J., and Schieber, S. J. (2005) Total retirement income: setting goals and meeting them. In Fundamentals of Private Pensions, 8th edn. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 401–443.Google Scholar
Mercer (2012) Melbourne Mercer Global Pension Index 2012. Melbourne: Australian Centre for Financial Studies. Available online at http://www.globalpensionindex.com/.Google Scholar
Munnell, A. H. and Soto, M. (2005) The House and Living Standards in Retirement. Issue Brief No. 39. Chestnut Hill, MA: Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.Google Scholar
OECD (2009) Pensions in Asia/Pacific: Ageing Asia must Face its Pension Problems. OECD Publishing, OECD Korea Centre. Available online at http://www.oecd.org/els/socialpoliciesanddata/41941763.pdf.Google Scholar
OECD (2012) Pensions at a Glance Asia/Pacific 2011. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264107007-en.Google Scholar
OECD (2013 a) Pensions at a Glance Asia/Pacific 2013. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/pension_asia-2013-en.Google Scholar
OECD (2013 b) Pensions at a Glance 2013: OECD and G20 Countries. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/pension_glance-2013-en.Google Scholar
OECD (2015) Health at a Glance 2015: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/health_glance-2015-en.Google Scholar
Purcell, P. J. (2012) Income replacement ratios in the health and retirement study. Social Security Bulletin, 72(3): 37–58.Google Scholar
Schieber, S. J. (2004) Retirement income adequacy: good news or bad? Benefits Quarterly, 20(4): 27–39.Google Scholar
Scholz, J. K. and Seshadri, A. (2009) What replacement rates should household use? Michigan Retirement Research Center Working Paper, WP2009-214. Available online at http://www.mrrc.isr.umich.edu/publications/papers/pdf/wp214.pdf.Google Scholar
Singapore, Central Provident Fund Board (2014) CPF LIFE: Retire with Peace of Mind, February 2014, Singapore.Google Scholar
Singapore, Department of Statistics, DOS (2014 a) Home Ownership Rate of Resident Households. Available online at (accessed 9 May 2014).Google Scholar
Singapore, Department of Statistics, DOS (2014 b) Complete Life Tables 2008–2013 for Singapore Resident Population. Singapore.Google Scholar
Singapore, Department of Statistics, DOS (2014 c) Report on the Household Expenditure Survey, 2012/2013, Singapore.Google Scholar
Singapore, Housing Development Board, HDB (2014) Public Housing in Singapore: Residents’ Profile, Housing Satisfaction and Preferences. Singapore: Oxford Graphic Printers Pte Ltd.Google Scholar
Singapore, Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore, IRAS. Revision of Annual Values for HDB Flats from 1 January 2012. Published by the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore, Singapore.Google Scholar
Singapore, Ministry of Health, MOH (2013) Healthcare Financing Sources. Available online at http://www.moh.gov.sg/content/moh_web/home/pressRoom/Parliamentary_QA/2013/healthcare-financing-sources0.html (accessed 15 March 2015).Google Scholar
Singapore, Ministry of Trade and Industry, MTI (2003) Report of the Economic Review Committee 2003. Singapore.Google Scholar
The World Bank (1994) Averting the Old Age Crisis: Policies to protect the old and to promote growth. World bank, Washington D.C. Available online at http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/1994/09/01/000009265_3970311123336/Rendered/PDF/multi_page.pdf.Google Scholar