Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:32:22.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The funding status of retiree health plans in the public sector

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2011

ROBERT L. CLARK  and
MELINDA SANDLER MORRILL
ROBERT L. CLARK
Affiliation:
College of Management, North Carolina State University (e-mail: [email protected])
MELINDA SANDLER MORRILL
Affiliation:
College of Management, North Carolina State University (e-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While no longer common in the private sector, most public sector employers offer retiree health insurance (RHI) as a retirement benefit to their employees. While these plans are thought to be an important tool for employers to attract, retain, motivate, and ultimately retire workers, they represent a large and growing cost. This paper reviews what is currently known about RHI in the public sector, while highlighting many important unanswered questions. The analysis is informed by data produced in accordance with the 2004 Government Accounting Standards Board Rule 45 (GASB 45). We consider the extent of the unfunded liabilities states face and explore what factors may explain the variation in liabilities across states. The importance and sustainability of RHI plans in the public sector ultimately depend on how workers view and value this post-retirement benefit, yet little is known about how RHI directly impacts the public sector labor market. We conclude with a discussion of the future of RHI plans in the public sector.

Keywords

H72H75J32J45Retiree health insurancepublic employeesother post employment benefitsstate budgets and medical costs
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Pension Economics & Finance , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , April 2011 , pp. 291 - 314
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blau, David M. and Gilleskie, Donna B. (2001) Retiree health insurance and the labor force behavior of older men in the 1990s. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(1): 64–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchmueller, Thomas, Johnson, Richard W. and Lo Sasso, Anthony T. (2006) Trends in retiree health insurance, 1997–2003. Health Affairs, 25(6): 1507–1516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chernew, Michael E., Hirth, Richard A. and Cutler, David M. (2009) Increased spending on health care: long term implications for the nation. Health Affairs, 28(5): 1253–1255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, Robert (2010) Retiree health plans for public school teachers after GASB 43 and 45. Education Finance and Policy, Fall: 438–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Robert and McDermed, Ann (1990) The Choice of Pension Plans in a Changing Regulatory Environment. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Clark, Robert and Morrill, Melinda Sandler (2010) Retiree Health Plans in the Public Sector: Is There a Funding Crisis? Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Robert, Ghent, Linda and Headen, Alvin (1994) Retiree health insurance and pension coverage: variations by firm characteristics. Journal of Gerontology, 49(2): 53–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, Robert, Craig, Lee and Sabelhaus, John (2011 forthcoming). Public Sector Pension Plans in the United States. Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Fidelity Investments (2009) Fidelity Investments Estimates $240,000 Needed to Pay Health Care Costs in Retirement. 26 March 2009.Google Scholar
Financial Accounting Standards Board (1989) Employers’ Accounting for Post-Retirement Benefits Other Than Pensions. Norwalk, CT: FASB.Google Scholar
Fronstin, Paul (2005) The Impact of the Erosion of Retiree Health Benefits on Workers and Retirees. EBRI Issue Brief No. 279. Washington, DC: EBRI.Google ScholarPubMed
Fronstin, Paul (2010) Implications of Health Reform for Retiree Health Benefits. Employee Benefit Research Institute Issue Brief No. 338. Washington, DC: EBRI.Google ScholarPubMed
Goldman Sachs (2007) The Trillion Dollar Question: What is Your GASB 45 Number? New York: Goldman Sachs.Google Scholar
Governmental Accounting Standards Board (2004) Statement No. 45. Accounting and Financial Reporting by Employers for Post-employment Benefits Other Than Pensions (OPEB), Issued June 2004, available at http://www.gasb.org/st/summary/gstsm45.html (accessed 5 December 2010).Google Scholar
Gruber, Jonathan and Madrian, Brigitte (1997) Employment separation and health insurance coverage. Journal of Public Economics, 66(3): 349–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, Jonathan and Madrian, Brigitte (2004) Health insurance, labor supply, and job mobility: a critical review of the literature. In McLaughlin, Catherine (ed.), Health Policy and the Uninsured. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press, pp. 97–178.Google Scholar
Gustman, Alan and Steinmeier, Thomas (1992) The stampede towards defined contribution plans. Industrial Relations, 31(2): 361–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Barry T. and Macpherson, David A. (2003) Union membership and coverage database from the current population survey: note. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 56(2), 349–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ippolito, Richard (1995) Towards explaining the growth of defined contribution plans. Industrial Relations, 34(1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser Family Foundation and Health Research and Educational Trust (2006) Employer Health Benefits 2006 Summary of Findings, available at http://www.kff.org/insurance/7527/index.cfm (accessed 1 December 2010).Google Scholar
Madrian, Brigitte C. (2010) Defined contribution plans in the public sector: lessons from behavioral economics. Paper presented at the NBER State and Local Pensions Conference, August 2010.Google Scholar
Munnell, Alicia, Haverstick, Kelly and Soto, Maurici (2007) Why Have Defined Benefit Plans Survived in the Public Sector. Issue Brief, Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.Google Scholar
Novy-Marx, Robert and Rauh, Joshua (2010) Policy options for state pension systems and their impact on plan liabilities. NBER Working Paper No. 16453, October 2010.Google Scholar
Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (2007) The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.Google Scholar
Pew Center on the States (2007) Promises with a Price: Public Sector Retirement Benefits. Pew Charitable Trusts, available at http://www.pewcenteronthestates.org/uploadedfiles/Promises%20with%20a%20Price.pdf (accessed 1 December 2010).Google Scholar
Pew Center on the States (2010) The trillion dollar gap. Available at http://downloads.pewcenteronthestates.org/The_Trillion_Dollar_Gap_final.pdf, (accessed 5 December 2010).Google Scholar
Rogowski, Jeannette and Karoly, Lynn (2000) Health insurance and retirement behavior: evidence from the health and retirement survey. Journal of Health Economics, 19(4), 529–539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Standard & Poor's. (2007) U.S, States Are Quantifying OPEB Liabilities and Developing Funding Strategies as the GASB Deadline Nears. New York: Standards & Poor's.Google Scholar
U.S General Accounting Office (2007) State and local government retiree benefits: current status benefit structures, protections, and fiscal outlook for funding future costs. GAO-07-1156. September, 2007.Google Scholar
U.S General Accounting Office (2008) State and local government retiree benefits: current funded status of pension and health benefits. GAO-08-223. January 2008.Google Scholar
U.S General Accounting Office (2009) State and local government retiree health benefits: liabilities are largely unfunded, but some governments are taking action. GAO-10-61.Google Scholar
Zion, David and Varshney, Amit (2007) You dropped a bomb on me, GASB. Credit Suisse. March 22, 2007.Google Scholar