Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:22:25.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluating alternative approaches for predicting pension benefits and incentives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2019

David Knapp ,
Maciej Lis ,
Jinkook Lee  and
Drystan Phillips
David Knapp*
Affiliation:
Economics, Sociology, and Statistics, RAND Corp Washington Office, 1200 South Hayes St., Arlington, Virginia, USA
Maciej Lis
Affiliation:
Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs, OECD, Paris, Île-de-France, France
Jinkook Lee
Affiliation:
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
Drystan Phillips
Affiliation:
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In an effort to promote comparative research on pensions, the Gateway to Global Aging Data is developing harmonized cross-national panel data on pension benefits and retirement incentives. Past research has varied in how it predicts pension benefits for individuals who have not yet claimed their benefits when administrative data on earnings histories is unavailable. We use the Gateway data to evaluate several alternative approaches to computing prospective pension benefits using common survey questions and validate them against matched administrative data. We find that in some settings naïve measures of pension benefit growth from continued work and delayed benefit claiming can perform as well as measures based on administrative data. We also find that prospective benefit levels are sensitive to the heterogeneity of lifecycle earnings dynamics, resulting in substantial measurement error even after accounting for work history.

Keywords

Cross-country analysisearnings dynamicsinternationalpensionsretirementsocial securityH55J26
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Pension Economics & Finance , Volume 20 , Special Issue 4: New Longitudinal Data for Retirement Analysis and Policy , October 2021 , pp. 454 - 467
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angrisani, M and Lee, J (2012) Harmonization of Cross-National Studies of Aging to the Health and Retirement Study: Income Measures. Santa Monica, CA. Available at http://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/WR861z5.html.10.7249/WR861.5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, J, Blake, M, Clemens, S, Marmot, M, Nazroo, J, Oldfield, Z, Oskala, A, Phelps, A, Rogers, N and Steptoe, A (2018) English Longitudinal Study of Ageing: Waves 0–8, 1998–2017. [data collection]. 28th Edition. UK Data Service. SN: 5050. Available at http://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-5050-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozio, A, Crawford, R and Tetlow, G (2010) The History of State Pensions in the UK: 1948 to 2010. London. Available at https://www.ifs.org.uk/publications/5000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carone, G, Eckefeldt, P, Giamboni, L, Laine, V and Pamies Sumner, SS (2016) Pension Reforms in the EU since the Early 2000's: Achievements and Challenges Ahead. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/dp042_en.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, J and Wise, DA (1999) Social Security and Retirement Around the World. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gruber, J and Wise, DA (2004) Social Security Programs and Retirement Around the World: Micro-Estimation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gustman, AL and Steinmeier, TL (1986) A structural retirement model. Econometrica 54, 555–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haider, SJ and Solon, G (2000) Non Random Selection in the HRS Social Security Earnings Sample. Santa Monica, CA. Available at https://www.rand.org/pubs/drafts/DRU2254.html.Google Scholar
Hubbard, RG, Skinner, J and Zeldes, SP (1995) Precautionary saving and social insurance. Journal of Political Economy 103, 360–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapteyn, A and Panis, C (2005) Institutions and savings for retirement: Comparing the United States, Italy, and The Netherlands. In Wise, DA (ed.) Analyses in the Economics of Aging. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 281–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagakos, D, Moll, B, Porzio, T, Qian, N and Schoellman, T (2017) Life cycle wage growth across countries. Journal of Political Economy 126, 797–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazear, EP (1986) Chapter 5 retirement from the labor force. In Ashenfelter OC and Layard R (eds), Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 1. Elsevier, pp. 305–355.10.1016/S1573-4463(86)01008-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggles, S, Flood, S, Goeken, R, Grover, J, Meyer, E, Pacas, J and Sobek, M (2018) IPUMS USA: Version 8.0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stock, JH and Wise, DA (1990) Pensions, the option value of work, and retirement. Econometrica 58, 1151–1180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamarro, G and Lee, J (2012) Harmonization of Cross-National Studies of Aging to the Health and Retirement Study: Employment and Retirement Measures. Santa Monica, CA. Available at http://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/WR861z4.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Knapp et al. supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Knapp et al. supplementary material(File)
File 37.4 KB