Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:14:19.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Earnings related pension schemes and human capital formation*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2014

FABIAN KINDERMANN
FABIAN KINDERMANN*
Affiliation:
University of Wuerzburg and Netspar, Sanderring 2, D-97070 Wuerzburg, Germany (e-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, I show that traditional earnings related pay-as-you-go pension systems as we see them in many OECD countries subsidize human capital formation. The reason is that these systems come along with an implicit tax structure that features high tax rates at the beginning of working life and low tax rates toward the end. When the costs of human capital investment are mainly time costs, such an implicit tax structure lowers the costs of human capital investments and simultaneously increases the payoff. The fact that higher skilled workers tend to have steeper wage profiles over the working phase than the unskilled enforces this mechanism. I first show this result in a simple analytical model and then quantify the macroeconomic and welfare effects of making the implicit tax structure age independent in a large-scale overlapping generation model, in which households can invest in human capital both by going to college and through on-the-job training. In terms of welfare, such a reform comes along with a lot of intergenerational redistribution. Although the welfare of current retirees may increase by about 4.5% of their remaining life-time resources, current older workers will lose due to an increase in their implicit tax rates. The welfare of future generations slightly declines by 0.1%.

Keywords

C68J24J26H55Pension systemshuman capital investmentnumerical OLG model
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Pension Economics & Finance , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , January 2015 , pp. 19 - 54
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I thank the editor Joshua Rauh and two anonymous referees as well as Hans Fehr, Jonathan Heathcote, Kai Eberhard Kruk, Alexander Ludwig, Jochen Mierau and seminar participants at the Netspar Pension Workshop, 4th RGS Doctoral Conference, OLG Days, Jerusalem Summer School in Economic Growth, CMR Macroeconomic Workshop and University of Minnesota for very helpful comments. Research support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant FE 377/5-1) is gratefully acknowledged.

References

Abbott, B., Gallipoli, G., Meghir, C. and Violante, G. L. (2013) Education policy and intergenerational transfers in equilibrium. NBER Working Papers 18782, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, A. J. and Kotlikoff, L. J. (1987) Dynamic Fiscal Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Auerbach, A. J. and Lee, R. (2009) Notional defined contribution pension systems in a stochastic context: design and stability. In Brown, J. R., Liebman, J. B. and Wise, D. A. (eds), Social Security Policy in a Changing Environment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 43–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Autorengruppe Bildungsberichterstattung (2008) Bildung in Deutschland 2008. Bielefeld.Google Scholar
Bomsdorf, E. (2002) Neue Generationensterbetafeln für die 2 Geburtsjahrgänge 1933 bis 2003: Modellrechnungen für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Lohmar: Eul Verlag.Google Scholar
Braun, R., Burger, F., Miegel, M., Pfeiffer, U. and Schul, K. (2002) Erben in Deutschland. Köln: Deutsches Institut für Altersvorsorge.Google Scholar
Carneiro, P. and Heckman, J. J. (2002) The evidence on credit constraints in post-secondary schooling. Economic Journal, 112(482): 705–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cascarico, A. and Devillanova, C. (2008) Capital-skill complementarity and the redistributive effects of Social Security Reform. Journal of Public Economics, 92(3–4): 672–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caucutt, E. M., Imrohoroglu, S. and Kumar, K. B. (2006) Does the progressivity of income taxes matter for human capital and growth?. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 8(1): 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cingano, F. and Cipollone, P. (2007) University drop-out: the case of Italy. Banca d'Italia Economic Working Papers 626, Rome.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund (2012) Aktuelle Daten 2013. Berlin.Google Scholar
Docquier, F. and Paddison, O. (2003) Social Security benefit rules, growth and inequality. Journal of Macroeconomics, 25(1): 47–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckstein, Z. and Wolpin, K. I. (1999) Why youths drop out of high school: the impact of preferences, opportunities, and abilities. Econometrica, 67(6): 1295–1339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guvenen, F., Kuruscu, B. and Ozkan, S. (2013) Taxation of human capital and wage inequality: a cross-country analysis. Review of Economic Studies, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Heckman, J. J. (1976) Estimates of a human capital production function embedded in a life-cycle model of labor supply. In Terleckyj, N. E. (ed.), Household Production and Consumption. Cambridge: NBER Books, National Bureau of Economics Research, pp. 225–264.Google Scholar
Heckman, J. J., Lochner, L. and Taber, C. (1998) Explaining rising wage inequality: explorations with a dynamic general equilibrium model of labor earnings and heterogeneous agents. Review of Economic Dynamics, 1(1): 1–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heineck, G. and Riphahn, R. (2009) Intergenerational transmission of educational attainment in Germany – the last five decades. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 229(1): 36–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imai, S. and Keane, M. P. (2004) Intertemporal labor supply and human capital accumulation. International Economic Review, 45(2): 601–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Institut der Deutschen Wirtschaft (2011) Deutschland in Zahlen. Cologne.Google Scholar
Jensen, S. E. H., Lau, M. I. and Poutvaara, P. (2004) Efficiency and equity aspects of alternative social security rules. FinanzArchiv, 60(3): 325–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, L. F. and Murphy, K. M. (1992) Changes in relative wages, 1963–1987: supply and demand factors. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(1): 35–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kindermann, F. (2012) Welfare effects of privatizing public education when human capital investments are risky. Journal of Human Capital, 6(2): 87–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, D. and Ludwig, A. (2013) Optimal progressive labor income taxation and education subsidies when education decisions and intergenerational transfers are endogenous. American Economic Review, 103(3): 496–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, M. I. and Poutvaara, P. (2006) Social security incentives and human capital investment. Finnish Economic Papers, 19(1): 16–24.Google Scholar
Le Garrec, G. (2012) Social security, income inequality and growth. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 11(1): 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, A., Schelkle, T. and Vogel, E. (2011) Demographic change, human capital and welfare. Review of Economic Dynamics, 15(1): 94–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montizaan, R., Cörvers, F. and de Grip, A. (2010) The effects of pension rights and retirement age on training participation: evidence from a natural experiment. Labour Economics, 17(1): 240–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (2009) Education at a Glance 2009. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD (2010) Education at a Glance 2010. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD (2011) Pensions at a Glance 2011. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
UNESCO (ed.) (2006) International Standard Classification of Education. Available online at http://www.unesco.org.Google Scholar
Willis, R. J. and Rosen, S. (1979) Education and self-selection. Journal of Political Economy, 87(5): S7–S36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, C. (2013) Accounting for the changing role of family income in determining college entry. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, forthcoming.Google Scholar