Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-20T04:08:42.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Behavioral effects of employer-sponsored retirement plans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2007

STEVEN A. NYCE
Affiliation:
Watson Wyatt Worldwide (e-mail: [email protected])

Abstract

Many organizations have either already terminated their defined benefit (DB) plans or are thinking about it, in order to offload the financial and regulatory risks these programs pose. But plan sponsors should think carefully about how their decision might affect their workers' commitment and productivity – and ultimately their organization's success.

To answer those and other retirement questions, Watson Wyatt set out to learn how DB and defined contribution (DC) plans affect employees' workforce behavior and decisions. Watson Wyatt's Retirement Attitude Survey (WWRAS) found that, while most workers value both types of plans very highly, workers with DB plans generally appreciate their retirement programs significantly more than those with only a DC plan. This was particularly the case for those with a hybrid pension plan. This analysis found that retirement plan generosity and effective communication strongly affect a plan's perceived value to employees. This has important implications for plan sponsors, since greater plan appreciation is strongly linked to employee commitment. In fact, we found that workers covered by a defined benefit plan express a very strong commitment to their current employer, while DC plan coverage has no effect on employee commitment. This is partly owing to a selection effect, whereby firms with DB plans tend to attract more committed workers. However, even after controlling for the selection effect, DB plans exert an independent effect on the likelihood that employees will stay with their employer.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, Steven, Clark, Robert L., and McDermed, Ann A. (1993) Pensions, bonding and lifetime jobs. Journal of Human Resources, 28(3): 463481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorsey, Stuart (1995) Pension portability and labor market efficiency: a survey of the literature. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(2): 276292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustman, Alan L., Mitchell, Olivia S., and Steinmeier, Thomas L. (1994) The role of pensions in the labor market: a survey of the literature. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 47(3): 417438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustman, Alan L. and Steinmeier, Thomas L. (1993) Pension portability and labor mobility: evidence from the SIPP. Journal of Public Economics, 50(50): 299323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ippolito, Richard A. (1997) Pension Plans and Employee Performance: Evidence, Analysis, and Policy. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ippolito, Richard A. (2002) Stayers as ‘savers’ and ‘workers’: toward reconciling the pension quit literature. Journal of Human Resources, 37(2): 275308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar