Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:57:25.296Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transitions from career employment among public- and private-sector workers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2019

Joseph F. Quinn
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA
Kevin E. Cahill*
Affiliation:
Center on Aging & Work at Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA
Michael D. Giandrea
Affiliation:
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Office of Productivity and Technology, Postal Square Building, Room 2180, 2 Massachusetts Ave., NE, Washington, DC 20212-0001, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Do the retirement patterns of public-sector workers differ from those in the private sector? The latter typically face a retirement landscape with exposure to market uncertainties through defined-contribution pension plans and private saving. Public-sector workers, in contrast, are often covered by defined-benefit pension plans that encourage retirement at relatively young ages and offer financial security at older ages. We examine how private- and public-sector workers transition from full-time career employment, with a focus on the importance of gradual retirement. To our surprise, we find that the prevalence of continued work after career employment, predominantly on bridge jobs with new employers, is very similar in the two sectors, a result with important implications in a rapidly aging society.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States.
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcover, C, Topa, G, Parry, E, Fraccaroli, F and Depolo, M (eds). (2014) Bridge Employment: A Research Handbook. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Beshears, J, Choi, JJ, Laibson, D and Madrian, BC (2010) The impact of employer matching on savings plan participation under automatic enrollment. In Wise, DA (ed.) Research Findings in the Economics of Aging. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 311328.Google Scholar
Bronshtein, G, Scott, JS, Shoven, JB and Slavov, S (2018) The power of working longer. NBER Working Paper No. 24226. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at http://www.nber.org/papers/w24226.Google Scholar
Brown, JR (2007) Rational and behavioral perspectives on the role of annuities in retirement planning. NBER Working Paper No. 13537. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at http://www.nber.org/papers/w13537.pdf.Google Scholar
Butrica, BA and Karamcheva, NS (2015) The relationship between automatic enrollment and DC plan contributions: Evidence from a national survey of older workers. CRR Working Paper No. 2015-04. Chestnut Hill, MA: Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. Available at: http://crr.bc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/wp_2015-14.pdf.Google Scholar
Cahill, KE, Giandrea, MD and Quinn, JF (2006) Retirement patterns from career employment. The Gerontologist 46, 514523.Google Scholar
Cahill, KE, Giandrea, MD and Quinn, JF (2013) Bridge employment. In Wang, M (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Retirement. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 293310.Google Scholar
Cahill, KE, Giandrea, MD and Quinn, JF (2015 a) Evolving patterns of work and retirement. In George, L and Ferraro, K (eds), The Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences, 8th Edn. New York, NY: Elsevier, pp. 271291.Google Scholar
Cahill, KE, Giandrea, MD and Quinn, JF (2015 b) Retirement patterns and the macroeconomy, 1992–2010: the prevalence and determinants of bridge jobs, phased retirement, and re-entry among three recent cohorts of older Americans. The Gerontologist 55, 384403.Google Scholar
Cahill, KE, Giandrea, MD and Quinn, JF (2018) Is bridge job activity overstated? Work, Aging and Retirement 4, 330351. Available at doi.org/10.1093/workar/way006.Google Scholar
Chief Human Capital Officers Council (2018) Employment as A Phased Retiree. Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Personel Management. Available at https://chcoc.gov/sites/default/files/Employment-as-a-Phased-Retiree-Q-and-A.pdf.Google Scholar
Clark, R and Morrill, MS (2016) Extending Work Life: Employer Interests and Concerns. Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.Google Scholar
Holden, S and VanDerhei, J (2005) The influence of automatic enrollment, catch-up, and IRA contributions on 401(k) accumulations at retirement. EBRI Issue Brief No. 283. Washington, DC: Employee Benefit Research Institute. Available at https://www.ebri.org/publications/ib/index.cfm?fa=ibDisp&content_id=3565.Google Scholar
Munnell, AH and Sass, SA (2008) Working longer: The Solution to the Retirement Income Challenge. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Quinn, JF (1999) Retirement patterns and bridge jobs in the 1990s. EBRI Issue Brief, no. 206, 123.Google Scholar
Quinn, JF and Cahill, KE (2016) The new world of retirement income security in America. American Psychologist 71(4), 321333.Google Scholar
Quinn, JF and Cahill, KE (2018) Challenges and opportunities of living and working longer. In Clark, R, Maurer, R and Mitchell, OS (eds), How Persistent Low Returns Will Shape Saving and Retirement. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 101118.Google Scholar
U.S. Office of Personnel Management (2018) Phased Retirement. Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Personel Management. Available at https://www.opm.gov/retirement-services/phased-retirement/.Google Scholar
Wang, M, Penn, LT, Bertone, A and Stefanova, S (2014) Bridge employment in the United States. In Alcover, C, Topa, G, Parry, E, Fraccaroli, F and Depolo, M (eds), Bridge Employment: A Research Handbook. New York, NY: Routlege, pp. 195215.Google Scholar