Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:49:33.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Spousal and survivor benefits in option value models of retirement: an application to Belgium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2017

ALAIN JOUSTEN
Affiliation:
University of Liège (Law Faculty, Tax Institute and HEC Liège), IZA and NETSPAR, Liege, Belgium (e-mail: [email protected])
MATHIEU LEFEBVRE
Affiliation:
University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, Alsace, France

Abstract

We study retirement incentives with an augmented reduced form option value model à la Stock and Wise (1990). We propose methodological extensions to better reflect the respective incentives faced by singles and couples. Our results show that a more comprehensive modeling of couples’ incentives leads to very different patterns of retirement incentives – particularly for women. We apply the new indicators to data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and retirement in Europe in Belgium and find two key results. First, contrary to several previous studies, we obtain a positive signed income effects. Second, we find very different retirement incentives for men and women, with little flexibility in the retirement decision for men and substantially more flexibility for women as a function of financial incentive and household composition.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors acknowledge financial support from the Belspo project EMPOV (TA/00/45). This paper uses data from the European Union Labour Force Survey (Eurostat, European Union). Eurostat has no responsibility for the results and conclusions which are the authors’ only. It also uses data from SHARE Waves 1 and 2 release 2.6.0, as of 29 November 2013 (DOI: 10.6103/SHARE.w1.260 and 10.6103/SHARE.w2.260) and SHARELIFE release 1.0.0, as of 24 November 2010 (DOI: 10.6103/SHARE.w3.100). The SHARE data collection has been primarily funded by the European Commission through the 5th Framework Programme (project QLK6-CT-2001-00360 in the thematic programme Quality of Life), through the 6th Framework Programme (projects SHARE-I3, RII-CT-2006-062193, COMPARE, CIT5-CT-2005-028857, and SHARELIFE, CIT4-CT-2006-028812) and through the 7th Framework Programme (SHARE-PREP, N° 211909, SHARE-LEAP, N° 227822 and SHARE M4, N° 261982). Additional funding from the US National Institute on Aging (U01 AG09740-13S2, P01 AG005842, P01 AG08291, P30 AG12815, R21 AG025169, Y1-AG-4553-01, IAG BSR06-11 and OGHA 04-064) and the German Ministry of Education and Research as well as from various national sources is gratefully acknowledged (see www.share-project.org for a full list of funding institutions). Comments welcome at [email protected].

References

Aliaj, A., Flawinne, X., Jousten, A., Perelman, S., and Shi, L. (2016) Old-age employment and hours of work trends: empirical analysis for four European countries. IZA Journal of European Labor Studies, 5: 16. doi: 10.1186/s40174-016-0066-1.Google Scholar
Atalay, K. and Barrett, G. (2016) Pension incentives and retirement decisions of couples. IZA discussion paper 10013, Institute for the Study of Labor.Google Scholar
Blöndal, S. and Scarpetta, S. (1999) The retirement decision in OECD countries. OECD Economics Department Working Papers 202, OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Belloni, M. and Alessie, R. (2009) The importance of financial incentives on retirement choices: new evidence for Italy. Labour Economics, 16: 578588.Google Scholar
Belloni, M. and Alessie, R. (2013) Retirement choices in Italy: what an option value model tells us. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 75: 499527.Google Scholar
Blau, D. (1998) Labor force dynamics of older married couples. Journal of Labor Economics, 16, 595629.Google Scholar
Blundell, R., Chiappori, P.-A., and Meghir, C. (2005) Collective labor supply with children. Journal of Political Economy, 113, 12771306.Google Scholar
Brugiavini, A. and Peracchi, F. (2004) Social Security and Retirement in Italy, Social Security Programs and Retirement Around the World: Micro Estimation. Gruber, J. and Wise, D. (eds). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cherchye, L., De Rock, B., and Vermeulen, F. (2012) Married with children. A collective labor supply model with detailed time use and intrahousehold expenditure information. American Economic Review, 102, 33773405.Google Scholar
Coile, C.C. (2015) Economic determinants of workers’ retirement decisions. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29(4): 830853.Google Scholar
Dellis, A., Desmet, R., Jousten, A., and Perelman, S. (2004) Micro- modeling of retirement in Belgium. In Gruber, J. and Wise, D. (eds), Social Security Programs and Retirement Around the World: Micro-Estimation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 4198.Google Scholar
Duval, R. (2003) The retirement effects of old-age pension and early retirement schemes in OECD countries. OECD Economics Department Working Papers 370, OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Fraikin, A.-L. and Jousten, A. (2016) Work and retirement patterns in Belgium: lessons from a panel dataset. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Gruber, J. and Wise, D. (1999) Social Security Programs and Retirement Around the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gruber, J. and Wise, D. (2004) Introduction and summary. In Gruber, J. and Wise, D. (eds), Social Security Programs and Retirement Around the World: Micro-Estimation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 140.Google Scholar
Gustman, A. and Steinmeier, T. (2000) Retirement in dual-career families: a structural model. Journal of Labor Economics, 18, 503545.Google Scholar
Jousten, A. and Lefebvre, M. (2013) Retirement incentives in Belgium: estimations and simulations using SHARE data. De Economist, 161(3): 253276.Google Scholar
Jousten, A. and Lefebvre, M. (2016) Older men's labor force participation in Belgium. University of Liège, http://hdl.handle.net/2268/201413.Google Scholar
Jousten, A., Lefebvre, M., and Perelman, S. (2012) Disability in Belgium: there is more than meets the eye. In Wise, D. (ed.), Social Security Programs and Retirement Around the World: Historical Trends in Mortality and Health, Employment, and Disability Insurance Participation and Reforms. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 251276.Google Scholar
Jousten, A., Lefebvre, M., and Perelman, S. (2016) Health status, disability and retirement incentives in Belgium. In Wise, D. (ed.), Social Security and Retirement Around the World: Disability Insurance Programs and Retirement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 179209.Google Scholar
Kapteyn, A. and de Vos, K. (2004) Social Security and Retirement in the Netherlands, Social Security Programs and Retirement Around the World: Micro Estimation. Gruber, J. and Wise, D. (eds). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Maestas, N. (2001) Labor, love and leisure: complementarity and the timing of retirement by working couples. mimeo, UC Berkeley, Department of Economics.Google Scholar
Michaud, P.-C. and Vermeulen, F. (2011) A collective labor supply model with complementarities in leisure: identification and estimation by means of panel data. Labour Economics, 18, 159167.Google Scholar
Stock, J.H. and Wise, D. A. (1990) Pensions, the option value of work, and retirement. Econometrica, 58(5), 11511180.Google Scholar
van Soest, A., Kapteyn, A., and Zissimopoulos, J. (2007) Using stated preferences data to analyze preferences for full and partial retirement. IZA Discussion Paper 2785, Institute for the Study of Labor.Google Scholar