Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:40:12.649Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Price efficiency in the Dutch Annuity Market*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2013

EDMUND CANNON
Affiliation:
University of Bristol, School of EFM, 8 Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1TN, UK (e-mail: [email protected])
RALPH STEVENS
Affiliation:
ARC Centre of Excellence in Population Aging Research, Australian School of Business, University of New South Wales, UNSW, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia (e-mail: [email protected])
IAN TONKS
Affiliation:
School of Management, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK (e-mail: [email protected])

Abstract

We provide the first analysis of annuity rates in the Netherlands for the period 2001–2012. During this period, the number of annuity providers was high and stable, and we find that falls in annuity rates can be explained entirely by changes in yields and life expectancy. We show that annuitants could have increased their annuity income by about 5%, by shopping around and purchasing their annuities from alternative providers. Money's worth calculations show that the market is efficient by international standards, with a money's worth above 0.9 for the whole period and close to unity by the end of the period. We present conflicting evidence on the existence of adverse selection because although we find money's worths are inversely related to age of purchase, we find that they are positively related to size of purchase.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The authors gratefully acknowledge support for this research from NETSPAR. An earlier version of this paper was presented at a Netspar Panel Session, April 2011, and the annuities workshop at Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule, Zürich, 2011; the paper has benefited from comments by Rob Alessie, Tim Boonen, Alwin Oerlemans, Adrie Moons, Kim Peijnenburg and Marno Verbeek. The data used in this paper was provided by Money View and the authors are grateful to Hedwig Dros, Henk Don, Arie Perfors, Emile Smits, and Jan-Bert Windhorst for assistance in obtaining and interpreting the data.

References

Aben, Mauritz (2011) Overview of the Italian Pension System. Trento: Università degli studi di Trento, available at http://eprints.biblio.unitn.it/2077/1/Aben_(2011)__Overview_of_the_Italian_pension_system.pdf.Google Scholar
Actuarieel Genootschap (2002) AG-Tafels 1995–2000.Google Scholar
Actuarieel Genootschap (2007) Over Sterfte en Overleven. An English version of the text is available as ‘On Mortality and Life Expectancy’.Google Scholar
Actuarieel Genootschap (2010) AG Prognosetafel 2010–2060. An English version of the text is available as ‘Life Expectancy, Projection Table 2010–60’.Google Scholar
Actuarieel Genootschap and Actuarieel Instituut (2009) Report on Principles for the Term Structure of Interest Rates: The Right Curve Does Not Exist.Google Scholar
Alessie, Rob, Van Rooij, Maarten and Lusardi, Annamaria (2011) Financial literacy and retirement preparation in the Netherlands. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 10: 527545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateman, H. and Piggott, J. (2011) ‘Too Much Risk to Insure? The Australian (non-) Market for Annuities.’ in Mitchell, Piggott and Takayama (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Jeffrey R., Mitchell, Olivia S., Poterba, James M. and Warshawsky, Mark J. (2001) The Role of Annuity Markets in Financing Retirement. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Jeffrey R., Kling, Jeffrey R., Mullainathan, Sendhil and Wrobel, Marian V. (2008) Why don't people insure late life consumption? A framing explanation of the under-annuitization puzzle. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 98(2): 304–09.Google Scholar
Bütler, Monika (2009) Switzerland: high replacement rates and generous subsistence as a barrier to work in old age. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice, 34: 561577.Google Scholar
Bütler, Monika and Staubli, Stefan (2011) ‘Payouts in Switzerland: Explaining Developments in Annuitization’ in Mitchell, Piggott and Takayama, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannon, Edmund and Tonks, Ian (2008) Annuity Markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannon, Edmund (2009) ‘Estimation and pricing with the Cairns-Blake-Dowd model of mortality)’, University of Verona, Dept of Economics, Working Paper 65.Google Scholar
Cannon, Edmund and Tonks, Ian (2011) ‘Compulsory and Voluntary Annuity Markets in the United Kingdom’ in Mitchell, Piggott and Takayama (2011).Google Scholar
Cannon, Edmund and Tonks, Ian (2013) ‘Cohort mortality risk or adverse selection in the UK annuity market?’ mimeo, University of Bristol.Google Scholar
European Commission Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs (2009) ‘Pension Schemes and pension projections in the EU-27 member states 2008–2060: Volume I – Report’ European Economy Occasional Paper 56.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, Amy and Poterba, James (2002) Selection effects in the United Kingdom individual annuity market. Economic Journal, 112(476): 2850.Google Scholar
Holzmann, Robert and Hinz, Richard (2005) Old Age Income Support in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Estelle and Song, Xi (2001) ‘Annuity markets around the world: money's worth and risk intermediation’ CeRP Working Paper 16/01.Google Scholar
James, Estelle, Martinez, Guillermo and Inglesias, Augusto (2006) The pay-out stage in Chile: who annuitizes and why? Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 5(2): 121–54.Google Scholar
Kaschützke, Barbara and Maurer, Raimond (2011) ‘The Private Life Annuity Market in Germany: Products and Money's Worth Ratios’ in Mitchell, Piggott and Takayama (2011).Google Scholar
Mackenzie, George A. (2006) Annuity Markets and Pension Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Olivia S., Piggott, John and Takayama, Noriyuki (2011) Securing Lifelong Retirement Income: Global Annuity Markets and Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paci, Sergio, Contaldo, Patrizia, Fiorentino, Claudio, Nocera, Giacomo, Spotorno, Lucia, Vallacqua, Francesco (2010) ‘Pension Funds in Italy’ CAREFIN Università Bocconi.Google Scholar
Palmer, Edward and Bo Larsson, (2011) ‘The Swedish annuity market: where it is and where it's headed’ in Mitchell, Olivia S., John Piggott and Noriyuki Takayama Securing Lifelong Retirement Income (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Pensions Commission (2004) Pensions: Challenges and Choices: The First Report of the Pensions Commission. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Rinaldi, Ambrogio (2011) ‘Pension Awareness and Nationwide Auto-Enrolment: The Italian Experience’ CERP WP 104/11, Università di Torino.Google Scholar
Ruiz, Jose and Mitchell, Olivia (2011) ‘Pension Payouts in Chile: Past, Present and Future Prospects’ in Mitchell, Piggott and Takayama (2011).Google Scholar
Schnabel, Reinhold (2004) ‘Private annuities and public pensions in Germany’ in Fornero, Elsa, and Elisa Luciano Developing an Annuity Market in Europe (Edward Elgar).Google Scholar
Sheshinski, Eytan (2008) The Economic Theory of Annuities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Teppa, Federica (2011) ‘Can the Longevity Risk Alleviate the Annuitization Puzzle? Empirical Evidence from Dutch Data’ Netspar DP 09/2011-075.Google Scholar
Watson-Wyatt (2006) ‘Global Survey of Accounting Assumptions for Defined Benefit Plans’.Google Scholar
World Bank (1994) Averting the Old Age Crisis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yaari, M. (1965) Uncertain lifetime, life assurance, and the theory of the consumer. Review of Economic Studies, 32(2): 137–50.Google Scholar