Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T23:07:45.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inflation experiences of retirees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2016

ADRIAAN KALWIJ
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Universiteit Utrecht, P.O. Box 80125, Utrecht 3508 TC, The Netherlands (e-mail: [email protected])
ROBERTUS ALESSIE
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 800, Groningen 9700 AV, The Netherlands
JONATHAN GARDNER
Affiliation:
Willis Towers Watson, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
ASHIK ANWAR ALI
Affiliation:
European Actuarial Services, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Abstract

The inflation experience of people depends on their expenditure patterns and price developments. This paper identifies groups of retirees that have experienced relatively high price inflation over the last few decades and could thus be considered most vulnerable when income decreases, as has been the case in the Netherlands in recent years. For this we use household budget survey data from 1978 to 2004 supplemented with price information from 1978 to 2012. A methodological contribution to the literature is that an empirical framework based on the theory of consumer demand is used that explicitly makes the link between expenditure patterns and inflation experiences of households. We find that retired couples aged 65–69 have experienced about average inflation over the past few decades. Differences in inflation experiences between households result from relative price increases in goods, such as rent and utilities, on which single, low-income and older households spend relatively more of their budget, and relative price decreases in goods, such as leisure activities (including vacations), on which these households spend relatively less. The estimated differences over the 1978–2012 period in annual inflation experience are about 0.14 percentage points between single and married retirees, 0.06 percentage points between retired couples in the age groups 65–69 and 75–79 and 0.19 percentage points between retirees with low and high expenditures. Although these differences are statistically significant, they could be considered too small to be of economic significance compared with an average household having experienced 2.4% annual inflation.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banks, J., Blundell, R. and Tanner, S. (1998) Is there a retirement puzzle? The American Economic Review, 88(4): 769788.Google Scholar
Barten, A. (1969) Maximum likelihood estimation of a complete system of demand equations. European Economic Review, 1: 173.Google Scholar
Blundell, R., Pashardes, P. and Weber, G. (1993) What do we learn about consumer demand patterns from micro data? The American Economic Review, 83(3): 570597.Google Scholar
Börsch-Supan, A. and Stahl, K. (1991) Life cycle savings and consumption constraints. Journal of Population Economics, 4: 233255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CBS (2014) Onderzoeksbeschrijving Statistiek Consumentenprijsindices (Research description of consumer price indices' statistics). Statistics Netherlands, Den Haag.Google Scholar
De Ree, J. and Alessie, R. (2009) Explaining the hump in life cycle consumption profiles. De Economist, 157: 107120.Google Scholar
Deaton, A. and Muellbauer, J. (1980) Economics and Consumer Behaviour. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DNB (2013) Five years in the pensions sector: curtailment and indexation in perspective. DNBulletin, 7 March 2013, available at http://www.dnb.nl.Google Scholar
Flower, T. and Wales, P. (2014) Variation in the Inflation Experience of UK Households: 2003–2014. Office for National Statistics, available at http://www.ons.gov.uk Google Scholar
Hayashi, F. (2000) Econometrics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kalwij, A. S. and Salverda, W. (2007) The effects of changes in household demographics and employment on consumer demand patterns. Applied Economics, 39(11): 14471460.Google Scholar
Kalwij, A., Alessie, R., Gardner, J. and Ali, A. A. (2015) Inflation experiences of retirees, Design Paper, 43, Network for Studies on Pensions, Aging and Retirement.Google Scholar
Knoef, M., Hussem, A., Soede, A. and de Bresser, J. (2014) Pensioen, consumptiebehoeften en ouderenzorg (Retirement, consumption needs and elder care). Netspar Design Paper 31.Google Scholar
Levell, P. and Oldfield, Z. (2011) The spending patterns and the inflation experience of low-income households over the past decade. IFS Commentary C119, The Institute of Fiscal Studies.Google Scholar
Lewbel, A. and Pendakur, K. (2009) Tricks with Hicks: the EASI demand system. American Economic Review, 99(3): 827863.Google Scholar
Miniaci, R., Monfardini, C. and Weber, G. (2003) Is there a Retirement Consumption Puzzle in Italy? (Working paper, WP03/14). London, UK: The Institute for Fiscal Studies.Google Scholar
Siermann, C., van Teeffelen, P. and Urlings, L. (2004) Equivalentiefactoren 1995–2000: Methode en belangrijkste uitkomsten (Equivalence factors, 1995–2000: methodology and major findings). Sociaal-economische Trends, 3: 6366.Google Scholar
Vermeulen, H., Woudstra, L., van Wersch, F. and Lammers, M. (2015) Koopkrachtontwikkeling postactieven (Purchasing power trends among retired public servants, Report, 4 June 2015). ITS Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar