Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:43:49.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of defaults on participation in state supplemental retirement savings plans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2021

Robert L. Clark  and
Denis Pelletier
Robert L. Clark*
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA
Denis Pelletier
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examines the impact of the adoption of automatic enrollment provisions by the state of South Dakota for its supplemental retirement saving plan (SRP). In South Dakota, state and local government employees, including teachers, are covered by a defined benefit pension plan and by Social Security. Prior to the introduction of automatic enrollment, the proportion of newly hired employees who were contributing to the SRP was less than 5% in their first year of employment. After the introduction of automatic enrollment, over 90% of newly hired workers who were auto-enrolled were participating in the plan. Using a difference-in-difference approach we find that automatic enrollment changes differences in the participation rate by age, sex, and income. We also find that prior to the adoption of auto-enrollment, agencies that ultimately chose to implement this policy had higher participation rates compared to those that did not adopt auto-enrollment.

Keywords

Public pension planssupplemental retirement saving plansautomatic enrollment
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Pension Economics & Finance , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , January 2022 , pp. 22 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernartzi, S and Thaler, R (2004) Save more tomorrow: using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. Journal of Political Economy S1, S164–S187.Google Scholar
Bernartzi, S and Thaler, R (2013) Behavioral economics and the retirement savings crisis. Science 339, 1152–1153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beshears, J, Choi, JJ, Laibson, D and Madrian, BC (2009) The importance of default options for retirement saving outcomes: Evidence from the United States. In Brown, J, Liebman, J and Wise, D (eds), Social Security Policy in A Changing Environment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 167–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, G, Choi, J, Laibson, D, Madrian, B and Metrick, A (2009) Optimal defaults and active decisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics 124, 1639–1674.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, J, Laibson, D and Madrian, B (2004a) Plan design and 401(k) savings outcomes. National Tax Journal LVII(2), 275–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, JJ, Laibson, D, Madrian, BC and Metrick, A (2004b) For better or for worse: Default effects and 401 (k) savings behavior. In Wise, D (ed.), Perspectives on the Economics of Aging. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 81–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, JJ, Laibson, D, Madrian, BC and Metrick, A (2005) Saving for retirement on the path of least resistance. In McCaffrey, EJ and Slemrod, J (eds), Behavioral Public Finance: Toward A New Agenda. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2006, pp. 304–351.Google Scholar
Clark, R, Hanson, E and Mitchell, O (2016a) Lessons for public pensions from Utah's move to pension choice. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance 15, 285–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R, Hanson, E, Morrill, M and Pathak, A (2016b) Supplemental plan offerings and retirement saving choices: an analysis of North Carolina school districts, Journal of Pension Economics and Finance 15, 333–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R, Pathak, A and Pelletier, D (2018a) Supplemental retirement savings plans in the public sector: participation and contribution decisions by school personnel. Journal of Labor Research 39, 383–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R, Franzel, J and Pelletier, D (2018b) Impact of Automatic Enrollment in the 457 Plan for South Dakota Public Employees, Center for State and Local Government Excellence. Available at https://slge.org/publications/impact-of-automatic-enrollment-in-the-457-plan-for-south-dakota-public-employees.Google Scholar
Goda, GS, Levy, M, Flaherty, C, Sojourner, A and Tassoff, J (2020) Who is a passive saver under Opt-In and auto-enrollment? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 173, 301–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, F (2000) Econometrics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Madrian, B and Shea, D (2001) The power of suggestion: inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics 66(4), 1149–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Clark and Pelletier supplementary material

Appendix

Download Clark and Pelletier supplementary material(File)
File 23.8 KB