Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T12:53:35.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Financial literacy and retirement planning: the Russian case*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2011

LEORA KLAPPER  and
GEORGIOS A. PANOS
LEORA KLAPPER
Affiliation:
The World Bank (e-mail: [email protected])
GEORGIOS A. PANOS
Affiliation:
Essex Business School, University of Essex (e-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We examine the relationship between financial literacy and retirement planning in Russia, a country with a relatively old and rapidly ageing population, large regional disparities, and emerging financial markets. We find that only 36% of respondents in our sample understand interest compounding and only half can answer a simple question about inflation. In a country with widespread public pension provisions, we find that financial literacy is significantly and positively related to retirement planning involving private pension funds. Thus, along with encouraging the availability of private retirement plans, efforts to improve financial literacy can be pivotal to the expansion of the use of such funds.

Keywords

D91G11G23Financial literacyretirement planningpensionsRussia
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Pension Economics & Finance , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , October 2011 , pp. 599 - 618
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernheim, D. (1995) Do households appreciate their financial vulnerabilities? An analysis of actions, perceptions, and public policy. In Walker, C. E., Bloomfield, M. and Thorning, M. (eds), Tax Policy and Economic Growth. Washington, DC: American Council for Capital Formation, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
EBRD (2007) Law in Transition. Available online at http://www.ebrd.com/downloads/research/law/lit071.pdfGoogle Scholar
Gächter, S. and Herrmann, B. (2006) The limits of self-governance in the presence of spite: experimental evidence from urban and rural Russia. IZA Working Paper No. 2236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavrilova, N. S. and Gavrilov, L. A. (2009) Rapidly changing population: Russia/Eastern Europe. In Uhlenberg, P. (ed.), International Handbook of Population Aging. Chapter 6. New York, NY: Springer Science and Business Media B. V., pp. 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurvich, E. (2004) The distributional aspects of Russia's pension system. Available online at http://www.eeg.ru/downloads/PUBLICATIONS/ANALYTICS/a20042511.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hauner, David (2008) Macroeconomic effects of pension reform in Russia. IMF Working Paper WP/08/201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lusardi, A. and Mitchell, O. S. (2007) Baby boomer retirement security: the role of planning, financial literacy, and housing wealth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 54: 205–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lusardi, A. and Mitchell, O. S. (2011) Financial literacy and planning: implications for retirement wellbeing. In Lusardi, Annamaria and Mitchell, Olivia S. (eds), Financial Literacy: Implications for Retirement Security and the Financial Marketplace. Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
OECD (2006) Reform and Challenges for Private Pensions in Russia. Private Pension Series No. 7. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Russia Census (2002) Available online at http://www.perepis2002.ru/index.html?id=87Google Scholar
Central Russian Statistics Offices (ROSSTAT) (2008). Available online at http://www.gks.ru/eng/Google Scholar
Terra Daily (10/07/ 2007) Russia has become a nation of pensioners. Available online at http://www.terradaily.com/reports/Russia_Has_Become_A_Nation_Of_Pensioners_999.htmlGoogle Scholar
World Bank (2007) From red to grey: the third transition of ageing population in Russia. Chapter 3. Russia Economic Report No. 15.Google Scholar