Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T23:34:29.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Default investment strategies in a defined contribution pension system: a pension risk model application for the chilean case*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2013

SOLANGE BERSTEIN ,
OLGA FUENTES  and
FÉLIX VILLATORO
SOLANGE BERSTEIN
Affiliation:
Pension Supervisor (e-mail: [email protected])
OLGA FUENTES
Affiliation:
Research Division, Pension Supervisor (e-mail: [email protected])
FÉLIX VILLATORO
Affiliation:
Adolfo Ibáñez University (e-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a defined contribution pension system, one of the main risks faced by members refers to the investment of funds. In this context, we discuss which is the most suitable risk measurement for the affiliates to the pension system. Different life-cycle investment strategies are evaluated under this measure for different types of workers. We point out the importance of designing well-suited default investment options in light of the economic behavior of members, characterized by low financial knowledge, inertia and myopia in decision-making. We calibrate a pension risk model for the Chilean economy, including measures of life-cycle income, human capital risk, investment and annuitization risks. Our results suggest that affiliates can gain (loss) around 0.85 percentage points in terms of average replacement rates in return for an increase (decrease) of 1 percentage point in risk, measured as standard deviation of replacement rates. Using a stochastic dominance analysis, we find that there are no dominated strategies when subsidies from the Solidarity Pillar are excluded. When the Solidarity Pillar is considered, the most appropriate investment strategies for affiliates that receive these subsidies are concentrated on the riskier funds. However, this also means that there could be increased pressure on Government spending in order to grant additional benefits to affiliates. Our model has a wide range of practical applications that go from informing affiliates about the degree of uncertainty associated to their expected replacement rate to a guide to evaluate how different investment strategies affect the expected values of affiliates' pensions and their associated risk.

Keywords

G23G11G32J26J32C15DC pension schemesportfolio choicepension riskage-based investment strategiesrisk sharingrisk based supervision
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Pension Economics & Finance , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , October 2013 , pp. 379 - 414
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antolín, P., Payet, S. and Yermo, J. (2010) Assessing default investment strategies in defined contribution pension plans, OECD Working Papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions, No. 2, OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/5kmdbx1nhfnp-enGoogle Scholar
Barr, N. and Diamond, P. (2008), Reforming Pensions: Principles, Analytical Errors and Policy Directions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berstein, S. and Tokman, A. (2005) Brechas de Ingreso entre Géneros: ¿Perpetuadas o Exacerbadas en la Vejez?, Working Paper No. 8, Pensions Supervisor.Google Scholar
Berstein, S., Castañeda, P., Fajnzylber, E. and Reyes, G., (eds) ( 2009) Chile 2008: A Second-Generation Pension Reform, Pensions Supervisor.Google Scholar
Berstein, S., Fuentes, O. and Torrealba, N. (2010) La Importancia de la Opción por Omisión en los Sistemas de Pensiones de Cuentas Individuales: Estrategias de Inversión de Ciclo de Vida, Working Paper No. 44, PensionsSupervisor. http://www.safp.cl/portal/informes/581/w3-propertyvalue-5865.htmlGoogle Scholar
Berstein, S. and Chumacero, R. (2010) VaR limits for pension funds: an evaluation. Quantitative Finance, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. and Viceira, L. (2005) The term structure of risk-return trade-off, Working Paper 11119, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Carroll, C. and Samwick, A. (1997) The nature of precautionary wealth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 40, pp. 41–71.Google Scholar
Cocco, J., Gomes, F. and Maenhout, P. (2005) Consumption and portfolio choice over the life cycle. The Review of Financial Studies, 18(2), pp. 491–533.Google Scholar
Deaton, A. (1997) The Analysis of Household Surveys: A Microeconometric Approach to Development Policy. Washington D.C.: World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
Eichberger, J. and Harper, I. (1997) Financial Economics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fajnzylber, E., Plaza, G. and Reyes, G. (2009) Better-informed workers and retirement savings decisions: impact evaluation of a personalized Pension Projection, Working Paper No. 31, Pensions Supervisor.Google Scholar
Gomez, F., Kotlikoff, L. and Viceira, L. (2008) Optimal life-cycle investing with flexible labor supply: A welfare analysis of life-cycle funds. American Economic Review, 98(2), pp. 297–303.Google Scholar
He, G. and Litterman, R. (2002) The intuition behind the Black–Litterman Model portfolios. Goldman Sachs, Fixed Income Research, Working Paper.Google Scholar
Hirshleifer, J. and Riley, J. (1997) The Analytics of Uncertainty and Information. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Law No 3,500 (1980) Creates the chilean DC pension system. Published November 13th of 1980. Available at www.spensiones.cl.Google Scholar
Lusardi, A. and Mitchell, O. (2005) Financial literacy and planning: implications for retirement wellbeing. De Nederlandsche Bank, DNB Working Paper. No. 78/December 2005.Google Scholar
Lusardi, A. and Mitchell, O. (2008) Planning and financial literacy: how do women Fare?. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 13750. January 2008.Google Scholar
Pension Funds Investment Regime (2008). Available at www.spensiones.cl.Google Scholar
Viceira, L. (2007) Life-cycle funds, SSRN Working Paper, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=988362.Google Scholar