Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:52:51.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Benchmark selection and performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2019

Dirk Broeders*
Affiliation:
De Nederlandsche Bank, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Leo de Haan
Affiliation:
De Nederlandsche Bank, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Using regulatory data free of self-reporting bias for 2007–16, we decompose investment returns of 455 Dutch pension funds according to their key investment decisions, i.e., asset allocation, market timing and security selection. In extension to existing papers, we also assess the impact of benchmark selection. Over time, asset allocation explains 39% of the variation of returns, whereas benchmark selection, timing and selection explain 11%, 9% and 16%, respectively. Across pension funds, asset allocation explains on average only 19% of the variation in pension fund returns. Benchmark selection dominates this by explaining 33% of cross-sectional returns. We relate the choice for a specific benchmark to investment, risk and style preferences.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andonov, A, Bauer, RMMJ and Cremers, KJM (2012) Can large pension funds beat the market? Asset allocation, market timing, security selection and the limits of liquidity. Available at ssrn.com/abstract=1885536.Google Scholar
Andreu, L, Ferruz, L and Vicente, L (2010) The importance of asset allocation in Spanish equity pension plans. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance 9, 129142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, RMMJ, Cremers, KJM and Frehen, RGP (2010) Pension fund performance and costs: small is beautiful. Available at ssrn.com/abstract=965388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bikker, JA, Broeders, DWGA and de Dreu, J (2010) Stock market performance and pension fund investment policy: rebalancing, free float, or market timing? International Journal of Central Banking 6, 5379.Google Scholar
Blake, D, Lehmann, BN and Timmermann, A (1999) Asset allocation dynamics and pension fund performance. Journal of Business 72, 429461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinson, GP, Hood, LR and Beebower, GL (1986) Determinants of portfolio performance. Financial Analysts Journal 42, 3944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinson, GP, Singer, BD and Beebower, GL (1991) Determinants of portfolio performance II: an update. Financial Analysts Journal 47, 4048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broeders, DWGA and Ponds, EHM (2012) Dutch pension system reform: a step closer to the ideal system design. CESifo DICE Report 3, 6576.Google Scholar
Broeders, DWGA, van Oord, JA and Rijsbergen, DR (2017) Does it pay to pay performance fees? Empirical evidence from Dutch pension funds. Journal of International Money and Finance 93, 299312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, KC, Garlappi, L and Tiu, C (2010) Asset allocation and portfolio performance: evidence from university endowment funds. Journal of Financial Markets 13, 268294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clare, A, Nitzsche, D and Cuthbertson, K (2010) An empirical investigation into the performance of UK pension fund managers. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance 9, 533547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, P and de Haan, L (2012) Pension fund finance and sponsoring companies. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance 11, 439463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Haan, L (2018) Recovery measures of underfunded pension funds: higher contributions. No indexation, or pension cuts? Journal of Pension Economics and Finance 17, 437468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) (2011) Rapport beleggingsopbrengst pensioenfondsen 2000–2010 (in het kader van de motie Van den Besselaar c.s.). November.Google Scholar
Drobetz, W and Köhler, F (2002) The contribution of asset allocation policy to portfolio performance. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management 16, 219233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, EG and French, KR (2015) A five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of Financial Economics 116, 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerritsen, M (2016) De beleggingsrendementen van de Nederlandse pensioenfondsen. Economisch Statistische Berichten 101, 340343.Google Scholar
Goyal, A and Wahal, S (2008) The selection and termination of investment management firms by plan sponsors. Journal of Finance 63, 18051847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinold, RC and Kahn, RN (2000) Active Portfolio Management: A Quantitative Approach for Providing Superior Returns and Controlling Risk, 2nd Edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Heale, M, Beath, AD and Heuberger, E (2018) Hedge fund reality check. CEM Benchmarking. Available at: https://cembenchmarking.com/ri/insight/15.Google Scholar
Huang, X and Mahieu, RJ (2012) Performance persistence of Dutch pension funds. De Economist 160, 1734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibbotson, RG and Kaplan, PD (2000) Does asset allocation policy explain 40, 90 or 100 percent of performance? Financial Analysts Journal 56, 2633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swamy, PAVB (1970) Efficient inference in a random coefficient regression model. Econometrica 38, 311323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Binsbergen, JH, Brandt, M and Koijen, RSJ (2008) Optimal decentralized investment management. Journal of Finance 63, 18491895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiong, JX, Ibbotson, RG, Idzorek, TM and Chen, P (2010) The equal importance of asset allocation and active management. Financial Analysts Journal 66, 2230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar