Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:08:18.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Zooids and extrazooidal skeleton in the order Trepostomata (Bryozoa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Richard S. Boardman  and
Caroline J. Buttler
Richard S. Boardman
Affiliation:
National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560
Caroline J. Buttler
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, National Museums and Galleries of Wales, Cathays Park, Cardiff CF10 3NP, Wales, United Kingdom,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Reconsideration of the nature of zooids in trepostomate Bryozoa defines them as physically connected and asexually replicated colony members that housed systems of organs necessary to perform vital functions for the colonies. Zooids known to contain organs in trepostomes are limited to autozooids, the requisite feeding and sexual units, and polymorphs, including macrozooids and two rare zooids of unknown function. Other colony structures are extrazooidal and remain outside zooidal boundaries throughout colony life. They include the commonly occurring mesopores, exilapores, and styles. This two-part morphologic division of colonies reveals two correlated functions. The essential autozooids dominated the growth patterns and physiology of trepostome colonies; the extrazooidal parts grew concurrently and passively to connect autozooids and to support and strengthen colonies.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 79 , Issue 6 , November 2005 , pp. 1088 - 1104
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Astrova, G. G. 1973. Polymorphism and its development in the trepostomatous Bryozoa, p. 1–10. In Larwood, G. P. (ed.), Living and Fossil Bryozoa. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Astrova, G. G. 1978. The history of development, system, and phylogeny of the Bryozoa, order Trepostomata. Trudy Paleontological Institute, 169:5–239.Google Scholar
Bassler, R. S. 1903. The structural features of the bryozoan genus Homotrypa, with descriptions of species from the Cincinnatian Group. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 26:565–591.Google Scholar
Bassler, R. S. 1911. The Early Paleozoic Bryozoa of the Baltic Provinces. U.S. National Museum Bulletin, 77:1–382.Google Scholar
Bassler, R. S. 1936. Nomenclatural notes on fossil and recent Bryozoa. Journal of Washington Academy of Science, 26:156–162.Google Scholar
Bassler, R. S. 1953. Bryozoa, p. 1–253. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. G, Bryozoa. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Blake, D. B. 1973. Acanthopore morphology and function in the bryozoan family Rhabdomesidae. Journal of Paleontology, 47:421–435.Google Scholar
Blake, D. B. 1983. Introduction to the suborder Rhabdomesina, p. 530–549. In Robinson, R. A. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Bryozoa. Pt. G (revised). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Blake, D. B., and Towe, K. M. 1971. Acanthopore ultrastructure in the Paleozoic bryozoan Idioclema insigne Girty. Journal of Paleontology, 45:913–917.Google Scholar
Boardman, R. S. 1960. Trepostomatous Bryozoa of the Hamilton Group of New York State. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 340, 87 p.Google Scholar
Boardman, R. S. 1965. Bryozoa, p. 241–281. In Hadley, J. S. (ed.), Geology and Paleontology of the Antarctic. Antarctic Research Series, American Geophysical Union, 6.Google Scholar
Boardman, R. S. 1983. General features of the class Stenolaemata, p. 50–137. In Robison, R. A. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Bryozoa. Pt. G (revised). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Boardman, R. S. 1998. Reflections on the morphology, anatomy, evolution, and classification of the class Stenolaemata (Bryozoa). Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 86:1–59.Google Scholar
Boardman, R. S. 1999. Indications of polypides in feeding zooids and polymorphs in Lower Paleozoic Trepostomata (Bryozoa). Journal of Paleontology, 73:803–815.Google Scholar
Boardman, R. S. 2001. The growth and function of skeletal diaphragms in the colony life of Lower Paleozoic Trepostomata (Bryozoa). Journal of Paleontology, 75:225–240.Google Scholar
Boardman, R. S., and Cheetham, A. H. 1983. Glossary of morphological terms, p. 304–320. In Robison, R. A. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Bryozoa. Pt. G (revised). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Boardman, R. S., and McKinney, F. K. 1976. Skeletal architecture and preserved organs of four-sided zooids in convergent genera of Paleozoic Trepostomata (Bryozoa). Journal of Paleontology, 50:25–78.Google Scholar
Boardman, R. S., Cheetham, A. H., and Cook, P. L. 1983. Introduction to the Bryozoa, p. 3–48. In Robison, R. A. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Bryozoa. Pt. G (revised). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Boardman, R. S., McKinney, F. K., and Taylor, P. L. 1992. Morphology, anatomy, and systematics of the Cinctiporidae, new family (Bryozoa: Stenolaemata). Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 70:1–81.Google Scholar
Conti, S., and Serpagli, E. 1987. Functional morphology of the cap-like apparatus in autozooids of a Paleozoic trepostome bryozoan. Lethaia, 20:1–20.Google Scholar
Duncan, H. 1939. Trepostomatous Bryozoa from the Traverse Group of Michigan. Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, 5(10):171–270.Google Scholar
Girty, G. H. 1910. New genera and species of Carboniferous fossils from the Fayetteville Shale of Arkansas. Annals New York Academy of Sciences, 20:189–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J. 1852. Paleontology of New York. II. Containing Descriptions of the Organic Remains of the Lower Middle Division of the New York System. C. V. Benthuysen, Albany, 362 p.Google Scholar
James, U. P. 1881. Papers on Bryozoa. The Paleontologist, Cincinnati, 5:33–44.Google Scholar
Karklins, O. L. 1983. Introduction to the suborder Ptilodictyina, p. 453–488. In Robison, R. A. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Bryozoa. Pt. G (revised). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Key, M. M. 1990. A new family of trepostome bryozoans from the Ordovician Simpson Group of Oklahoma. Journal of Paleontology, 64:700–724.Google Scholar
Milne-Edwards, H., and Haime, J. 1851. A monograph of the British fossil corals. Palaeontographical Society, London, p. 72–146.Google Scholar
Morozova, I. L. 1965. Bryozoa, p. 183–197. In Rezhentzev, V. E. and Sariecheva, T. G. (eds.), Development and Change in Marine Organisms from the Border of the Paleozoic and Mesozoic. Trudy Paleontological Institute, 106.Google Scholar
Nicholson, H. A. 1875. Descriptions of a new species and of a new genus of Polyzoa from the Paleozoic rocks of North America. Geological Magazine, n. s., 2:33–38.Google Scholar
Nicholson, H. A. 1879. On the Structure and Affinities of the “Tabulate Corals” of the Paleozoic Period, With Critical Descriptions of Illustrative Species. William Blackwood and Sons, Edinborough, 342 p.Google Scholar
Nicholson, H. A. 1881. On the Structure and Affinities of the Genus Monticulipora and its Subgenera, With Critical Descriptions of Illustrative Species. William Blackwood and Sons, Edinborough, 240 p.Google Scholar
Nicholson, H. A., and Etheridge, R. 1877. On Prasopora Grayae, a new genus and species of Silurian corals. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, fourth series, 20:388–392.Google Scholar
Nikiforova, A. I. 1933. The Late Paleozoic bryozoans of the Dzhul'fa Region. Transactions of the United Geological and Prospecting Service of the USSR, 264, 44 p.Google Scholar
Owen, D. B. 1969. Wenlockian Bryozoa from Dudley, Niagara and Gotland and their paleogeographic implications. Palaeontology, 12:621–636.Google Scholar
Prout, H. A. 1860. Fourth series of descriptions of Bryozoa from the Paleozoic rocks of the western states and territories. Transactions of the St. Louis Academy of Science, 1:571–581.Google Scholar
Rominger, C. 1866. Observations on Chaetetes and some related genera, in regard to their systematic position, with an appended description of some new species. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia Proceedings, p. 113–123.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. P. 1967. Champlainian Ectoprocta (Bryozoa), New York State. Journal of Paleontology, 41:632–648.Google Scholar
Tavener-Smith, R. 1969. Wall structure and acanthopores in the bryozoan Leioclema asperum . Lethaia, 2:89–97.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O. 1879. Descriptions of new genera and species of fossils from the Lower Silurian about Cincinnati. Journal of the Cincinnati Society of Natural History, 2:19–131.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O. 1882. American Paleozoic Bryozoa. Journal of the Cincinnati Society of Natural History, 5:232–257.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O. 1883. American Paleozoic Bryozoa. Journal of the Cincinnati Society of Natural History, 6:82–92.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O. 1886. Report on the Lower Silurian Bryozoa with preliminary descriptions of some new species. Minnesota Geological Natural History Survey Annual Report, 14:57–103.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O. 1890. Palaeozoic Bryozoa. Illinois Geological Survey, 8:283–688.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O., and Bassler, R. S. 1904. A revision of the Paleozoic Bryozoa. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 47:15–55.Google Scholar
Utgaard, J. 1983. Systematic descriptions for the order Cystoporata, p. 358–439. In Robison, R. A. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Bryozoa. Pt. G (revised). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Vinassa de Regny, P. E. 1921. Sulla classificazione dei Treptostomidi. Atti della Societa Italiana di Scienze Naturali, 59:213–231.Google Scholar
Winston, J. E. 1978. Polypide morphology and feeding behavior in marine Ectoprocts. Bulletin of Marine Science, 28:1–31.Google Scholar