Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:09:49.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two Ordovician asterozoans (Echinodermata) of problematic affinities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Daniel B. Blake
Daniel B. Blake*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Illinois, Rm. 156, 605 E. Springfield, Champaign, 61820, USA,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Phragmactis grayae Spencer and Swataria derstleri new genus new species are early (Ordovician) asterozoans (Echinodermata) that comprise the Phragmactinidae. Asterozoans are complexly varied, but as is true for other echinoderms, ambulacral construction is critical to interpretation. Phragmactinids share plesiomorphic aspects of ambulacral form and articulation with basal somasteroids and stenuroids whereas the apomorphic ambulacral expressions of asteroids and ophiuroids are lacking. Phragmactinids, like asteroids and ophiuroids, have only one virgal-series ossicle associated with each ambulacral, unlike the multiple ossicles of somasteroids and stenuroids. Virgal morphology of phragmactinids is reminiscent of expressions in somasteroids and stenuroids. Aspects of phragmactinid mouth frame construction are apomorphic. Morphologies of other ossicular series are similarly varied, and as a result, the family cannot be easily fitted into a recently proposed class-level taxonomy of early asterozoans; it is left in open nomenclature. Phragmactinid morphology does not indicate behavior significantly different from that of other early asterozaons. Asterozoan diversity suggests an early period of rapid evolutionary radiation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 88 , Issue 6 , November 2014 , pp. 1163 - 1173
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergström, S. M., Chen, X., Gutiérez-Marco, J. C., and Dronov, A. 2008. The new chronostratigraphic classification of the Ordovician System and its relations to major regional series and stages and to δ13C chemostratigraphy. Lethaia, 42:97–107.Google Scholar
Billings, E. 1858. On the Asteridae of the lower Silurian rocks of Canada. Figures and descriptions of Canadian organic remains. Geological Survey of Canada, Dec. 3:75–85.Google Scholar
Blake, D. B. 2007. Two Late Ordovician asteroids (Echinodermata) with characters suggestive of early ophiuroids. Journal of Paleontology, 81:1476–1485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, D. B. 2013. Early asterozoan (Echinodermata) diversification: a paleontologic quandary. Journal of Paleontology, 87:353–372.Google Scholar
Blake, D. B. and Guensburg, T. E. 1993. New Lower and Middle Ordovician stelleroids (Echinodermata) and their bearing on the origins and early history of the stelleroid echinoderms. Journal of Paleontology, 67:103–113.Google Scholar
Cramer, H. R 1957. Ordovician starfish from the Martinsburg Shale, Swatara Gap, Pennsylvania. Journal of Paleontology, 31:903–907.Google Scholar
Fell, H. B. 1962. A living somasteroid, Platasterias latiradiata Gray. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Art. 6, 16 p.Google Scholar
Fell, H. B. 1963. The phylogeny of sea-stars. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, Ser. B, 246:381–435.Google Scholar
Forbes, E. 1849. Protaster sedgwickii . Memoirs of the Geological Survey of the United Kingdom. Figures and Descriptions illustrative of British Organic Remains, Dec. 1, pl. 4, figs. 1–4.Google Scholar
Hotchkiss, F. H. C. 1970. North American Ordovician Ophiuroidea, the genus Taeniaster Billings (1858) (Protasteridae). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 85:59–76.Google Scholar
Hotchkiss, F. H. C. 1977. Ophiuroid Ophiocanops (Echinodermata) not a living fossil. Journal of Natural History, 11:377–380.Google Scholar
Jaekel, O. 1923. Zur Morphogenie der Asterozoa. Palaeontologischen Zeitschrift, 5:344–350.Google Scholar
Jefferies, R. P. S. 1986. The Ancestry of the Vertebrates. British Museum (Natural History), London, 376 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1881. Description of some new and remarkable crinods and other fossils of the Hudson River group. Journal of the Cincinnati Society of Natural History, 4:69–77.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1884. Description of a beautiful star fish and other fossils. Journal of the Cincinnati Society of Natural History, 7:16–20.Google Scholar
Schuchert, C. 1915. Revision of Paleozoic Stelleroidea with special reference to North American Asteroidea. Bulletin of the U. S. National Museum, 88, 311 p.Google Scholar
Shackleton, J. D. 2005. Skeletal homologies, phylogeny and classification of the earliest asterozoan echinoderms. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 3:29–114.Google Scholar
Smith, A. B. and Jell, P. A. 1990. Cambrian edrioasteroids from Australia and the origin of starfishes. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 28:715–778.Google Scholar
Spencer, W. K. 1914–1940. The British Palaeozoic Asterozoa. Palaeontographical Society of London Monograph, Pts. 1–10 (for 1913–1940), 540 p.Google Scholar
Spencer, W. K. 1914. The British Palaeozoic Asterozoa. Palaeontographical Society of London Monograph, Pt. 1 (for 1913), p. 1–56.Google Scholar
Spencer, W. K. 1916. The British Palaeozoic Asterozoa. Palaeontographical Society of London Monograph, Pt. 2 (for 1915), p. 57–108.Google Scholar
Spencer, W. K. 1919. The British Palaeozoic Asterozoa. Palaeontographical Society of London Monograph, Pt. 4 (for 1917), p. 169–196.Google Scholar
Spencer, W. K. 1922. The British Palaeozoic Asterozoa. Palaeontographical Society of London Monograph, Pt. 5 (for 1920), p. 197–236.Google Scholar
Spencer, W. K. 1925. The British Palaeozoic Asterozoa. Palaeontographical Society of London Monograph, Pt. 6 (for 1922), p. 237–324.Google Scholar
Spencer, W. K. 1940. The British Palaeozoic Asterozoa. Palaeontographical Society of London Monograph, Pt. 10 (for 1940), p. 495–540.Google Scholar
Spencer, W. K. 1951. Early Palaeozoic starfish. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, Ser. B, 235:87–129.Google Scholar
Spencer, W. K. and Wright, C. W. 1966. Asterozoans, p. U4–U107. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. U, Echinodermata 3 (1). The Geological Society of America and The University of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Thoral, M. 1935. Deuxième Thèse. Contribution à l'étude paléontologique de l'Ordovicien inférieur de la Montagne Noire et Révision sommaire de la faune cambrienne de la Montagne Noire. Sér. A, No. 1541, No. D'Ordre: 2407. Imprimerie de la manufacture de la charité (Pierre-Rouge), Montpellier, 363 p.Google Scholar
Zittel, K. A. 1895. Grundzüge der Palaeontologie (Palaeozoologie). R. Oldenbourg, Munich, 971 p.Google Scholar