Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:19:27.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two occurrences of the genus Pictetia (Early Cretaceous, Albian, Ammonoidea) in California

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Peter U. Rodda  and
Michael A. Murphy
Peter U. Rodda
Affiliation:
California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco 94118
Michael A. Murphy
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis 95616
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two specimens of the Cretaceous genus Pictetia Uhlig, 1883, have been found in the Cottonwood District, northern California, the first record of this genus in North America. The larger specimen is a septate whorl fragment from the Brewericeras hulenense zone that is associated with Douvilleiceras mammillatum. It is identified as Pictetia sp. The smaller specimen is a septate fragment of one and a half whorls from the Oxytropidoceras packardi zone associated with Cleoniceras. It is identified with the type species, Pictetia astieriana Orbigny, 1842, previously recorded from Europe. A review of the genus Pictetia suggests that species assigned to the genus have an open coil with a rounded dorsum. The occurrences of these Tethyan elements in the Albian fauna of the Cottonwood District suggest easy communication for many Cretaceous taxa between northern California and the Tethyan realm of Europe, the Caucasus, and Madagascar.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 66 , Issue 3 , May 1992 , pp. 435 - 439
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, F. M. 1902. Cretaceous Deposits of the Pacific Coast. California Academy of Sciences Proceedings, 3rd Series, 2, 126 p.Google Scholar
Anderson, F. M. 1938. Lower Cretaceous deposits in California and Oregon. Geological Society of America Special Papers 16, 339 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, R. 1960. A Monograph of the Lower Greensand. Part 1. Palaeontographical Society, London, 44 p.Google Scholar
Collignon, M. 1962. Atlas des fossiles caracteristiques de Madagascar (Ammonites), Part 9, Aptien. Service geologique, Madagascar, Tananarive, 64 p.Google Scholar
Collignon, M. 1963. Atlas des fossiles caracteristiques de Madagascar (Ammonites), Part 10, Albien. Service geologique, Madagascar, Tananarive, 184 p.Google Scholar
Doguzhayeva, L. A., and Mikhaylova, I. A. 1982. Early ontogenesis in Cretaceous heteromorphic ammonoids. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, 263:1233–1237.Google Scholar
Druschits, V. V. 1958. Lytoceratina, p. 54–63. In Luppov, N. P. and Druschits, V. V. (eds.), Osnovy Palaeontology, Handbook of the Paleontology and Geology of the U.S.S.R., Mollusca—Cephalopoda II. Gosudarstvyennoye nauchno-teknicheskoye izdatyelstvo literaturi po geologii i okranye neadr, Moscow, 332 p.Google Scholar
Gabb, W. M. 1864. Description of the Cretaceous Fossils. Geological Survey of California, Paleontology, 1:58–81, 102–236.Google Scholar
Gabb, W. M. 1869. Cretaceous fossils—description of new species (California). Geological Survey of California, Paleontology, 2:127–254.Google Scholar
Karakasch, K. 1907. Le Cretace inferieure de la Crimee et sa faune. Travaux Societe imperiale naturelle, St. Petersburg, Section geologique et mineralogique 32(5):1–482.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J., and Klinger, H. C. 1978. Cretaceous faunas from Zululand and Natal, South Africa, the Ammonite Family Lytoceratidae Neumayr, 1875. Annales of the South African Museum, 74(12):257–333.Google Scholar
Murphy, M. A. 1956. Lower Cretaceous stratigraphic units of northern California. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 40:2098–2119.Google Scholar
Neumayr, M. 1875. Die Ammoniten der Kreide und die Systematic der Ammonitiden. Deutsch Geologische Gesellschaft, Berlin, 27:854–892.Google Scholar
Orbigny, A. d'. 1840–1842. Paleontologie Francaise. Terrains Cretaces. Volume 1, Cephalopodes, 662 p.Google Scholar
Owen, H. G. 1984. Albian stage and substage boundaries. Bulletin Geological Society of Denmark, 33:183–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, H. G. 1988. Correlation of ammonite faunal provinces in the Lower Albian (mid-Cretaceous), p. 477–489. In Wiedmann, J. and Kullmann, J. (eds.), Cephalopods Present and Past. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Pictet, F. J., and Campiche, G. 1858–1864. Materiaux pour la paleontologie Suisse. Description des fossiles du terrain Cretace des environs de Ste. Croix, I(1):1–184.Google Scholar
Rafinesque-Schmaltz, C. S. 1815. Analyse de la nature, ou tableaux d'univers des corps Georgie, 3:165–273.Google Scholar
Renz, O. 1982. The Cretaceous Ammonites of Venezuela. Birkhauser, Basel, 132 p.Google Scholar
Rodda, P. U., and Murphy, M. A. 1985. Paleontological survey of the Cottonwood Creek project. Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District, DACW05-83-R-0084:1–68.Google Scholar
Rodda, P. U., and Murphy, M. A. 1987. Paleontological survey Hulen Reservoir project. California Department of Water Resources, Northern District, Red Bluff California, B-56151-A1:1–305.Google Scholar
Roth, P. H. 1984. Mesozoic palaeoceanography of the North Atlantic and Tethys Oceans, p. 299–320. In Summerhayes, C. P. and Shackleton, N. J. (eds.), North Atlantic Palaeoceanography. Geological Society Special Publication, 21.Google Scholar
Spath, L. F. 1923. A Monograph of the Ammonoidea of the Gault. Palaeontographical Society, London, Part I:1–72.Google Scholar
Uhlig, V. 1883. Der Cephalopoden der Wernsdorfer Schichten. Denkschrift Akademie Wissenschaft, Wien, 46(2):127–290.Google Scholar