Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:53:43.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tikisuchus romeri, a new rauisuchid reptile from the Late Triassic of India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Sankar Chatterjee  and
Pranab K. Majumdar
Sankar Chatterjee
Affiliation:
The Museum, Texas Tech University, Lubbock 70409
Pranab K. Majumdar
Affiliation:
Geology Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Calcutta 700035, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Tikisuchus romeri n. gen. and sp. is a rauisuchid thecodontian from the Late Triassic Tiki Formation of India and is the first rauisuchid material to be recorded from Asia. The skull is very large in relation to the presacral length and is equipped with sharp, serrated teeth. The astragalus has a very high dorsal process and the calcaneal tuber is short; the ankle joint is of “crocodile-normal” type.

The rauisuchids were the dominant terrestrial predators during the Triassic and shared similar ecological niches with the emerging theropods. The agility and superior locomotion of theropods may have contributed to their success and to their eventual replacement of the rauisuchids at the end of the Triassic.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 61 , Issue 4 , July 1987 , pp. 787 - 793
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bakker, R. T. 1975. Dinosaur renaissance. Scientific American, 232(4):58–78.Google Scholar
Bakker, R. T. 1980. Dinosaur heresy—dinosaur renaissance: why we need endothermic archosaurs for a comprehensive theory of bioenergetic evolution, p. 351–462. In Thomas, R. D. K. and Olson, E. C. (eds.), A Cold Look at the Warm-blooded Dinosaurs. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Bonaparte, J. F. 1981. Descripcion de Fasolasuchus tenax y su significado en la sistematica y evolucion de los Thecodontia. Rev. Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales. “Bernardino Riva,” 3(2):55–101.Google Scholar
Bonaparte, J. F. 1984. Locomotion in rauisuchid thecodonts. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 3:210–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brian, M. V. 1956. Exploitation and interference in interspecies competition. Journal of Animal Ecology, 25:339–346.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, S. 1978. A primitive parasuchid (phytosaur) reptile from the Upper Triassic Maleri Formation of India. Palaeontology, 21:83–127.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, S. 1982. Phylogeny and classification of thecodontian reptiles. Nature, 195:317–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatterjee, S. 1985. Postosuchus, a new thecodontian reptile from the Triassic of Texas and the origin of tyrannosaurs. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 309:395–460.Google Scholar
Cloudsley-Thompson, J. L. 1969. The Zoology of Tropical Africa. Norton, New York, 356 p.Google Scholar
Dawley, R. M., Zawiskie, J. M., and Cosgriff, J. W. 1979. A rauisuchid thecodont from the Upper Triassic Popo Agie Formation of Wyoming. Journal of Paleontology, 53:1428–1431.Google Scholar
Gause, G. F. 1934. The Struggle for Existence. Hafner, New York, 163 p.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hotton, N. III. 1980. An alternative to dinosaur endothermy: the happy wanderers, p. 311–345. In Thomas, R. D. K. and Olson, E. C. (eds.), A Cold Look at the Warm-blooded Dinosaurs. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Huene, F. V. 1938. Ein grosser Stagonolepide aus der jungeren Trias Ostafrikas. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie, Beilage B, 80:264–278.Google Scholar
Huene, F. V. 1942. Die fossilen Reptilien des Südamerikanischen Gondwanalandes. Ergebnisse der Säuriergrabungen in Südbrasilen. 1928/1929. C. H. Beck'sche, München, 332 p.Google Scholar
Krebs, B. 1965. Ticinosuchus ferox no v. gen. nov. sp. Ein neuer Pseudosuchier aus der Trias des Monte San Giorgio. Schweizerische Paläontologische Abhandlungen, 81:1–140.Google Scholar
Olsen, P. E., and Galton, P. M. 1984. A review of the reptile and amphibian assemblages from the Stormberg of southern Africa with special emphasis on the footprints and the age of the Stormberg. Palaeontologia Africana, 25:87–110.Google Scholar
Ostrom, J. H. 1972. Were some dinosaurs gregarious? Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 11:287–301.Google Scholar
Pontin, A. J. 1982. Competition and Coexistence of Species. Pitman, Boston, 102 p.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. L. 1973. Paleoclimatology and continental drift, p. 451–476. In Tarling, D. H. and Runcorn, S. K. (eds.), Implications of Continental Drift to the Earth Sciences. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Romer, A. S. 1971. The Chanares (Argentina) Triassic reptile fauna. VIII. A fragmentary skull of a large thecodont, Luperosuchus fractus . Breviora, 373:1–8.Google Scholar
Sill, W. D. 1974. The anatomy of Saurosuchus galilei and the relationships of the rauisuchid thecodonts. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 146:317–362.Google Scholar
Thulborn, R. A. 1982. Speeds and gaits of dinosaurs. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 38:227–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, M. E., and Benton, M. J. 1982. Triassic environments and reptile evolution. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 40:361–379.Google Scholar