Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:34:06.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Systematics of the koneprusiine trilobites, with new taxa from the Silurian and Devonian of Laurentia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Jonathan M. Adrain ,
Brian D. E. Chatterton  and
Gerald J. Kloc
Jonathan M. Adrain
Affiliation:
1Department of Geoscience, University of Iowa, 121 Trowbridge Hall, Iowa City, 52242,
Brian D. E. Chatterton
Affiliation:
2Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E3, Canada,
Gerald J. Kloc
Affiliation:
3Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Systematics of the trilobite subfamily Koneprusiinae Vaněk and Pek, 1987 are revised on the basis of new material and a comprehensive parsimony analysis. New taxa include the genus Nevadaprusia (type species N. cortezensis n. sp.) from the Pragian of Nevada and the species Laethoprusia graffhami n. sp. from the Lochkovian of Oklahoma, L. cozarti n. sp. from the Lochkovian of Tennessee, and Laethoprusia n. sp. A from the Sheinwoodian of Arctic Canada and the southern Mackenzie Mountains. Nevadaprusia insolita (Haas) is revised on the basis of new material. Laethoprusia and Nevadaprusia are interpreted as sister taxa, and Koneprusia and Isoprusia are successive sister groups to the Laethoprusia/Nevadaprusia clade.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 82 , Issue 4 , July 2008 , pp. 657 - 675
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adrain, J. M. 1997. Proetid trilobites from the Silurian (Wenlock-Ludlow) of the Cape Phillips Formation, Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Palaeontographia Italica, 84:21–111.Google Scholar
Adrain, J. M. 1998. Systematics of the Acanthoparyphinae (Trilobita), with species from the Silurian of Arctic Canada. Journal of Paleontology, 72:698–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adrain, J. M. 2003. Validity and composition of the Silurian trilobite genera Borealarges and Dicranogmus, with new species from the Canadian Arctic. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 40:749–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adrain, J. M. and Edgecombe, G. D. 1997. Silurian encrinurine trilobites from the central Canadian Arctic. Palaeontographica Canadiana 14, 109 p.Google Scholar
Adrain, J. M. and Kloc, G. J. 1997. Lower Devonian aulacopleuroidean trilobites from Oklahoma. Journal of Paleontology, 71:703–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adrain, J. M. and Ramsköld, L. 1997. Silurian Odontopleurinae (Trilobita) from the Cape Phillips Formation, Arctic Canada. Journal of Paleontology, 71:237–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alberti, G. K. B. 1967. Neue obersilurische sowie unter- und mitteldevonische Trilobiten aus Marokko, Deutschland und einigen anderen europäischen Gebieten. 2. Senckenbergiana lethaea, 48:481–509.Google Scholar
Alberti, G. K. B. 1969. Trilobiten des jüngeren Siluriums sowie des unter- und Mitteldevons. I. Abhandlungen der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft 520, 692 p.Google Scholar
Alberti, G. K. B. 1970. Trilobiten des jüngeren Siluriums sowie des Unter- und Mitteldevons. II. Abhandlungen der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft 525, 233 p.Google Scholar
Alberti, G. K. B. 1983. Trilobiten des jüngeren Siluriums sowie des Unter- und Mittel-Devons. IV. Senckenbergiana lethaea, 64:1–88.Google Scholar
Alberti, G. K. B. 2000. Herzynische Trilobiten aus dem tief-mitteldevonischen Anteil des Styliolinenkalkes vom Unteren Scheerenstieg (Selke-Tal, Unterharz). Senckenbergiana lethaea, 80:537–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alberti, H. 1969. Trilobiten (Harpidae und Odontopleuridae) aus dem Devons des Harzes und des Rheinischen Schiefergebirges (Beitrag II). Geologisches Jahrbuch, 87:361–382.Google Scholar
Amsden, T. W. 1960. Stratigraphy and paleontology of the Hunton Group in the Arbuckle Mountain region. Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin 84, 311 p.Google Scholar
Barrande, J. 1846. Notice Préliminaire Sur le Systême Silurien et les Trilobites de Bohême. Hirschfeld, Leipzig, 97 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrande, J. 1872. Systême silurien du centre de la Bohême, 1ère Partie; Recherches paléontologiques, I. Supplément, 647 p.Google Scholar
Basse, M. 1998. Trilobiten aus mittlerem Devon des Rhenohercynikums: III. Proetidae (3), Phacopida (2), Lichida (Lichoidea, Odontopleuroidea) und ergänzende Daten. Palaeontographica Abteilung A, 249:1–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyrich, E. 1846. Untersuchungen über Trilobiten. Zweite Stück als Fortsetzung zu der Abhandlung “Ueber einiger böhmische Trilbobiten,” 37 p.Google Scholar
Broadhead, T. W. and Gibson, M. A. (eds.). 1995. Upper Silurian-Lower Devonian biotas and paleoenvironments of the western Tennessee shelf. University of Tennessee Department of Geological Sciences Studies in Geology 25, 94 p.Google Scholar
Bruton, D. L. 1966. A new odontopleurid genus from the Devonian of Bohemia. Palaeontology, 9:330–345.Google Scholar
Burmeister, H. 1843. Die Organisation der Trilobiten aus ihren Lebenden Verwandten Entwickelt; Nebst einer Systematischen Uebersicht aller Zeither Beschriebenen Arten. Reimer, Berlin, 147 p.Google Scholar
Campbell, K. S. W. 1977. Trilobites of the Haragan, Bois d'Arc and Frisco Formations (Early Devonian), Arbuckle Mountains Region, Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin 123, 139 p.Google Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E. and Perry, D. G. 1983. Silicified Silurian odontopleurid trilobites from the Mackenzie Mountains. Palaeontographica Canadiana 1, 127 p.Google Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E. and Perry, D. G. 1984. Silurian cheirurid trilobites from the Mackenzie Mountains northwestern Canada. Palaeontographica Abteilung A, 184:1–78.Google Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E., Johnson, B. D., and Campbell, K. S. W. 1979. Silicified Lower Devonian trilobites from New South Wales. Palaeontology, 22:799–837.Google Scholar
Chlupáč, I. 1969. Revision of the Middle Devonian trilobites from Horní Benesov in the Nízky Jeseník Mts. (Moravia). Sborník Geologických Věd. Paleontologie, 10:67–103.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1841. On the palaeontology of the State of New York. Reports of the New York State Geological Survey, 5:39, 40, 48, 49.Google Scholar
Dean, W. T. 1974. The trilobites of the Chair of Kildare Limestone (upper Ordovician) of eastern Ireland. 2. Monographs of the Palaeontographical Society, 539:61–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erben, H. K. 1952. Trilobiten aus dem Älteren Herzyn (Unterdevon) des Unterharzes. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie. Abhandlungen, 94:150–362.Google Scholar
Feist, R. 1977. Le Siluro-Dévonien du Sud-Est de la Montagne Noire (Hérault, France) et ses faunes de Trilobites. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Université des Sciences et Techniques du Languedoc, Montpellier, 251 p.Google Scholar
Feist, R. 1999. First mid-Devonian trilobites from the Carnic Alps. Abhandlungen der Geologischen Bundesanstalt, 54:295–302.Google Scholar
Gibson, M. A. 1995. Depositional environments of the Birdsong Shale Member of the Ross Formation, p. 33–47. In Broadhead, T. W. and Gibson, M. A. (eds.), Depositional environments of the Birdsong Shale Member of the Ross Formation. University of Tennessee Department of Geological Sciences Studies in Geology, 25.Google Scholar
Gigout, M. 1951. Études Géologiques sur la Meseta Marocaine Occidentale (arrière-pays de Casablanca, Mazagan et Safi). Notes et Mémoires (Notes du Ser vice de Mines et de la Carte géologique du Maroc), 86:1–507.Google Scholar
Gilluly, J. and Masursky, H. 1965. Geology of the Cortez Quadrangle, Nevada. United States Geological Survey Bulletin 1175, 117 p.Google Scholar
Haas, W. 1969. Lower Devonian trilobites from central Nevada and northern Mexico. Journal of Paleontology, 43:641–659.Google Scholar
Hammann, W. 1976. Trilobiten aus dem oberen Caradoc der östlichen Sierra Morena (Spanien). Senckenbergiana Lethaea, 57:35–85.Google Scholar
Hammann, W. 1992. The Ordovician trilobites from the Iberian Chains in the province of Aragón, NE-Spain. I. The trilobites of the Cystoid Limestone (Ashgill Series). Beringeria, 6:3–219.Google Scholar
Havliček, V. and Vaněk, J. 1996. Brachiopods and trilobites in the Chynice Limestone (Emsian) at Bubovice (Cerinka hillside; Prague Basin). Palaeontologia Bohemiae, 1:1–16. (Privately published)Google Scholar
Hawle, I. and Corda, A. J. C. 1847. Prodrom einer Monographie der Böhmischen Trilobiten. J. G. Calve, Prague, 176 p.Google Scholar
Hörbinger, F. 2004. Trilobites from the biodetritic facies of the lower part of Lochkov Formation (Lochkovian, Lower Devonian) from “Požáry-Vokounka” quarry (Prague-Řeporyje, Prague Basin, Czech Republic). Palaeontologia Bohemiae, 9:19–31. (Privately published)Google Scholar
Horny, R. and Bastl, F. 1970. Type Specimens of Fossils in the National Museum, Prague. Volume 1. Trilobita. Museum of Natural History, Prague, 354 p.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. G. 1977. Lower and Middle Devonian faunal intervals in central Nevada based on brachiopods, p. 16–32. In Murphy, M. A., Berry, W. B. N., and Sandberg, C. A. (eds.), Western North America: Devonian. University of California, Riverside Campus Museum Contribution 4.Google Scholar
Kim, I. 1997. Trilobiten aus dem Greifensteiner Kalk (Grenzbereich UnterMittel Devon). Palaeontographica Abteilung A, 245:157–205.Google Scholar
Lenz, A. C. and Melchin, M. J. 1991. Wenlock (Silurian) graptolites, Cape Phillips Formation, Canadian Arctic Islands. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 82:211–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lütke, F. 1965. Zur Kenntnis herzynischer Trilobiten aus dem Silur und Mitteldevon des Harzes. Palaeontographica Abteilung A, 124:151–236.Google Scholar
Maksimova, Z. A. 1972. Novye devonskiye trilobity Phacopoidea. Paleontologicheskij Zhurnal, 1:88–94.Google Scholar
M'coy, F. 1846. A synopsis of the Silurian fossils of Ireland. 72 p.Google Scholar
Morris, S. F. 1988. A review of British trilobites, including a synoptic revision of Salter's monograph. Monographs of the Palaeontographical Society, 574:1–316.Google Scholar
Murchison, R. I. 1839. The Silurian System. 786 pp.Google Scholar
Novák, O. 1883. Zur Kenntnis der böhmischen Trilobiten. Beiträge zur Paläontologie Österreich—Ungarns und des Orients, 3:23–63.Google Scholar
Ormiston, A. R. 1969. The trilobite Koneprusia in the Lower Devonian of Alaska. Journal of Paleontology, 43:1210–1212.Google Scholar
Perry, D. G. and Chatterton, B. D. E. 1976. Phacops and other trilobites from Emsian age beds of the Delorme Formation, Mackenzie Mountains, Northwest Territories. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 13:1466–1478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pillet, J. 1973. Les trilobites du Dévonien inférieur et du Dévonien moyen du Sud-Est du Massif armoricain. Mémoires de la Société des Études Scientifiques de l'Anjou, 1, 307 p.Google Scholar
Prantl, F. and Přibyl, A. 1949. A study of the superfamily Odontopleuracea nov. superfam. (trilobites). Rozpravy Ustředního Ústavu Geologického, 12:1–221. (In Czech and English, with Russian summary)Google Scholar
Přibyl, A. and Vaněk, J. 1966. Zur Kenntnis der Odontopleuridae—Trilobiten aus dem böhmischen Altpaläozoikum. Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Geologica, 4:289–304.Google Scholar
Přibyl, A. and Vaněk, J. 1973. Über Hypostome von Odontopleuriden (Trilobiten) und ihrer Systematik. Časopis pro Mineralogii a Geologii, 18:301–307.Google Scholar
Ramsköld, L. 1991a. Pattern and process in the evolution of the Odontopleuridae (Trilobita). The Selenopeltinae and Ceratocephalinae. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 82:143–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsköld, L. 1991b. The perforated trilobite Laethoprusia gen. nov., and the phylogeny of Koneprusia and Isoprusia (Odontopleuridae, Koneprusiinae). Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 82:125–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsköld, L. and Chatterton, B. D. E. 1991. Revision and subdivision of the polyphyletic “Leonaspis” (Trilobita). Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 82:333–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, R. and Richter, E. 1917a. Über die Einteilung der Familie Acidaspidae und über einige ihrer devonishcen Vertreter. Zentralblatt für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie, 1917:462–472.Google Scholar
Richter, R. and Richter, E. 1917b. Paläontologische Beobachtungen im Rheinischen Devon. I. Über einzelne Arten von Acidaspis, Lichas, Cheirurus, Aristozoë, Prosocoelus, Terebratula und Spirophyton aus der Eifel. Jahrbuch des Nassauischen Vereins für Naturkunde. Wiesbaden, 70:143–161.Google Scholar
Santel, W. 2001. Trilobiten aus dem Silur der Karnischen Alpen/Österreich. Teil I. Palaeontographica Abteilung A, 262:87–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Šnajdr, M. 1984. Revision of the trilobite type material of I. Hawle and A. J. C. Corda, 1847. Sborník Národního Muzea v Praze. Rada B. Prírodní Vedy, 39:129–212. (For 1983)Google Scholar
Šnajdr, M. 1986. Bohemian representatives of the trilobite genera Orphanaspis, Selenopeltoides and Taemasaspis (Odontopleuridae). Časopis Národního Muzea, 153:212–216. (For 1984)Google Scholar
Termier, H. and Termier, G. 1950. Paléontologie Marocaine II. Invertébrés de l'Ére Primaire. Fasc. IV. Annelides, Arthropodes, Echinodermes, Conularides et Graptolithes. Notes et Mémoires. Service Géologique du Maroc 79, 277 p.Google Scholar
Vaněk, J. 1962. Předbězná zpráva o paleontologických výzkumech několita lokalit v silura a devonu Velké Prahy. Zprávy o Geologických Vyzkumech V R, 1961:81–85.Google Scholar
Vaněk, J. 1999. Pražský stupeň (spodní devon) v Pražské pánvi a relativni stáři jeho facií (Česká republika). Palaeontologia Bohemiae, 5:39–67. (Privately published)Google Scholar
Vaněk, J. and Pek, I. 1987. Genus Koneprusia (Trilobita) from the Devonian of central Bohemia. Časopis pro Mineralogii a Geologii, 32:262–270.Google Scholar
Vaněk, J. and Valíěek, J. 2002. New index of the genera, subgenera, and species of Barrandian trilobites Part C-D (Silurian and Devonian). Palaeontologia Bohemiae, 8:1–74. (Privately published)Google Scholar
Vaněk, J., Vokáč, V., and Hörbinger, F. 1992. New trilobites from the Silurian and Devonian in the Prague Basin (Central Bohemia). Vestník Ústředního Ústavu Geologického, 67:97–108.Google Scholar
Warder, J. A. 1838. New trilobites. American Journal of Science, (1) 34:377–380.Google Scholar
Weber, V. N. 1932. Trilobity Turkestana [Trilobites of the Turkestan]. Trudy Vsesoyuznogo Geologo-Razvedochnogo Ob'edineniya NKTP, 1-4, 157 p. (In Russian, with English summary)Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1956. Silicified Middle Ordovician trilobites: The Odontopleuridae. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 114:155–288.Google Scholar