Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:23:25.831Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spiracarneyella, a new carneyellid edrioasteroid from the Upper Ordovician (Katian) of Kentucky and Ohio and comments on carneyellid heterochrony

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2020

Colin D. Sumrall Open the ORCID record for Colin D. Sumrall [Opens in a new window]  and
Daniel Phelps
Colin D. Sumrall
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN37996-1526, USA,
Daniel Phelps
Affiliation:
Kentucky Paleontological Society, 2004 Sawyer Court, Lexington Kentucky40514
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new genus and species of carneyellid edrioasteroid, Spiracarneyella florencei n. gen. n. sp., is described from the Upper Ordovician (Kaitian) Point Pleasant Formation of northern Kentucky and southern Ohio. Spiracarneyella n. gen. is characterized by having all five ambulacra curving clockwise around the theca, having small node-bearing interambulacral plates in the distal interambulacra, and having the periproct placement slightly offset to the right side of the CD interambulacrum. The oral area of carneyellids evolved by paedomorphosis of the oral plates covering the mouth. The straight ambulacra of Cryptogoleus and the spiraling ambulacra of Spiracarneyella n. gen. evolved by paedomorphosis and peramorphosis, respectively.

UUID: http://zoobank.org/79733c8f-0bc8-4e7e-8f77-8508f576755c

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 95 , Issue 3 , May 2021 , pp. 624 - 629
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bassler, R.S., 1936, New species of American Edrioasteroidea (with seven plates): Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, v. 95, n. 6, p. 1–33.Google Scholar
Bell, B.M., 1976a, A study of North American Edrioasteroidea: New York State Museum Memoir 21, 446 p.Google Scholar
Bell, B.M., 1976b, Phylogenetic implications of ontogenetic development in the class Edrioasteroidea (Echinodermata): Journal of Paleontology, v. 50, p. 1001–1019.Google Scholar
Bell, B.M., 1979, Edrioasteroids (Echinodermata), in Pojetta, J., ed., Contributions to the Ordovician paleontology of Kentucky and nearby states: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1066–E, p. E1–E7.Google Scholar
Billings, E., 1858, On the Asteriadae of the Lower Silurian rocks of Canada, in Figures and Descriptions of Canadian Organic Remains, Decade 3: Montreal, Geological Survey of Canada, p. 75–85.Google Scholar
Brett, C.E., Young, A.L., Hartshorn, K.R., McLaughlin, P.I., and Dattilo, B.F., 2018, Day 2: Mohawkian to basal Cincinnatian (upper Sandbian to mid Katian) strata of central Kentucky, in Brett, C.E., Hartshorn, K.R., Young, A.L., Schwalback, C.E., and Stigall, A.L., The Classic Upper Ordovician Stratigraphy and Paleontology of the Eastern Cincinnati Arch: Field Trip Guidebook for the International Geoscience Programme (IGCP) Project 653, Third Annual Meeting, 2018, Athens, Ohio, p. 123–139.Google Scholar
Hall, J., 1866, Descriptions of new species of Crinoidea and other fossils: New York State Museum of Natural History Annual Report, v. 20, p. 1–17.Google Scholar
Kammer, T.W., Sumrall, C.D., Ausich, W.I., Deline, B., and Zamora, S., 2013, Oral region homologies in Paleozoic crinoids and other plesiomorphic pentaradial echinoderms: PLOS ONE, v. 8, p. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077989Google ScholarPubMed
McKinney, M.L., 1988, Classifying heterochrony, in McKinney, M.L., ed., Heterochrony in Evolution: Topics in Geobiology, v. 7, Boston, Springer, p.17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinney, M.L., and Sumrall, C.D., 2011, Ambulacral growth allometry in edrioasteroids: functional surface-volume change in ontogeny and phylogeny: Lethaia, v. 44, p. 102–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, D.L., 1990, Population paleoecology and comparative taphonomy of two edrioasteroid (Echinodermata) pavements: Upper Ordovician of Kentucky and Ohio: Historical Biology, v. 4, p. 155–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, S.A., 1894, Agelacrinus faberi Miller: Journal of the Cincinnati Society of Natural History, v. 17, p. 22–23.Google Scholar
Shroat-Lewis, R.A., McKinney, M.L., Brett, C.E., Meyer, D.L, and Sumrall, C.D., 2011, Paleoecologic assessment of an edrioasteroid (Echinodermata) encrusted hardground from the Upper Ordovician (Maysvillian) Bellevue Formation, Maysville, Kentucky: Palaios, v. 26, p. 470–483.Google Scholar
Shroat-Lewis, R.A., Sumrall, C.D., McKinney, M.L., and Meyer, D.L., 2014, A paleoecological comparison of two edrioasteroid (Echinodermata) -encrusted pavements from the Upper Ordovician Corryville Formation of Florence, Kentucky and the Miamitown Shale of Sharonville, Ohio: Palaios, v. 29, p. 154–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprinkle, J., 1973, Morphology and Evolution of Blastozoan Echinoderms: Special Publication, Memoirs of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 283 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprinkle, J., and Bell, B.M., 1978, Paedomorphosis in edrioasteroid echinoderms: Paleobiology, v. 4, p. 82–88.Google Scholar
Sumrall, C.D., 1993, Thecal designs in isorophinid edrioasteroids: Lethaia, v. 26, p. 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumrall, C.D., 1996, Late Paleozoic edrioasteroids (Echinodermata) from the North American midcontinent: Journal of Paleontology, v. 70, p. 969–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumrall, C.D., 2001, Paleoecology of two new edrioasteroids from a Mississippian hardground in Kentucky: Journal of Paleontology, v. 75, p. 136–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumrall, C.D., 2010a, The systematics of a new Maysvillian (Upper Ordovician) edrioasteroid pavement from northern Kentucky: Journal of Paleontology, v. 84, p. 783–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumrall, C.D., 2010b, A model for elemental homology for the peristome and ambulacra in blastozoan echinoderms, in Proceedings of the 12th International echinoderm conference, Durham, August 2006: London, CRC Press, p. 269–276.Google Scholar
Sumrall, C.D., 2017, New insights concerning homology of the oral area and ambulacral system in echinoderms, in Zamora, S., ed., Progress in Echinoderm Paleontology: Special Issue, Journal of Paleontology, v. 91, p. 604–617.Google Scholar
Sumrall, C.D., and Bowsher, A.L., 1996, Giganticlavus, a new genus of Pennsylvanian edrioasteroid from North America: Journal of Paleontology, v. 70, p. 986–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumrall, C.D., and Waters, J.A., 2012, Universal elemental homology in glyptocystitoids, hemicosmitoids, coronoids and blastoids: steps toward echinoderm phylogenetic reconstruction in derived Blastozoa: Journal of Paleontology, v. 86, p. 956–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumrall, C.D., and Wray, G.A., 2007, Ontogeny in the fossil record: diversification of body plans and the evolution of “aberrant” symmetry in Paleozoic echinoderms: Paleobiology, v. 33, p. 149–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumrall, C.D., and Zamora, S., 2011, Ordovician edrioasteroids from Morocco: faunal exchanges across the Rheic Ocean: Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, v. 9, p. 425–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumrall, C.D., and Zamora, S., in press, New data on edrioasteroids from the Upper Ordovician of the Anti-Atlas (Morocco), in Hunter, A., ed., The Upper Ordovician Echinoderm Fauna from the Anti-Atlas Mountains of Morocco: Papers in Palaeontology, v. 485, p. 1–13.Google Scholar