Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T14:38:43.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some new and rarely documented Late Cretaceous calcareous nannofossils from subsurface sediments in South Carolina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Jean M. Self-Trail
Jean M. Self-Trail*
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68508-0340
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One new calcareous nannofossil genus Senilatus; four new calcareous nannofossil species Calculites favosus, Lithraphidites? charactozorro Self-Trail and Pospichal, Rucinolithus oriens, and Watznaueria bybelliae; and one new combination, Senilatus zipperum n. gen. and comb., are described from Upper Cretaceous (upper Campanian to Maastrichtian) sediments of east-central South Carolina. These new species were described from five coreholes located in marine coastal plain deposits. There is evidence that the presence of one species, Senilatus zipperum, is indicative of nearshore, restricted environments. Scanning electron and light microscope pictures are provided for two species, Cretarhabdus multicavus Bukry, 1969 and Retemediaformis teneraretis Varol, 1991, that have previously been documented only with the transmission electron microscope. The ranges of these two species have been extended beyond those stated in the original descriptions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 73 , Issue 5 , September 1999 , pp. 952 - 963
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benson, R. N., and Spoljaric, N. 1996. Stratigraphy of the post-Potomac Cretaceous–Tertiary rocks of central Delaware. Delaware Geological Survey Bulletin, 20:1–28.Google Scholar
Black, M., and Barnes, B. 1959. The structure of coccoliths from the English Chalk. Geological Magazine, 96:321–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, C. E. 1995. Sequence stratigraphy, biostratigraphy and taphonomy in shallow marine environments. Palaios, 10:597–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bukry, D. 1969. Upper Cretaceous coccoliths from Texas and Europe. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, 51:1–121.Google Scholar
Burnett, J. A., Hancock, J. M., Kennedy, W. J., and Lord, A. R. 1992. Macrofossil, planktonic foraminiferal and nannofossil zonation at the Campanian/Maastrichtian boundary. Newsletters on Stratigraphy, 27:157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybell, L. M., and Self-Trail, J. M. 1995. Evolutionary, biostratigraphic, and taxonomic study of calcareous nannofossils from a continuous Paleocene–Eocene boundary section in New Jersey. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 1554, 113 p.Google Scholar
Bybell, L. M., Conlon, K. J., Edwards, L. E., Frederiksen, N. O., Gohn, G. S., and Self-Trail, J. M. 1998. Biostratigraphy and physical stratigraphy of the USGS-Cannon Park core (CHN-800), Charleston County, South Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey Open-file Report, 98-246, 65 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, W. K. 1997. The Late Cretaceous belemnite family Belemnitellidae: Taxonomy and evolutionary history. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark, 44(1):59–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deflandre, G., and Fert, C. 1954. Observations sur les Coccolithophorides actuels et fossiles en microscopic ordinaire et electronique. Annales de Paleontologie, 40:115–176.Google Scholar
Dowsett, H. J. 1989. Documentation of the Santonian–Campanian and Austinian–Tayloran stage boundaries in and Alabama using calcareous microfossils. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin, 1884:1–35.Google Scholar
Farhan, A. J., Burnett, J. A., Bown, P. R., and Lord, A. R. 1994. Holococcoliths from the upper Cretaceous of Alabama and Mississippi (U.S.). Cahiers de Micropaleontologie, 9:57–71.Google Scholar
Gohn, G. S. 1992. Revised nomenclature, definitions, and correlations for the Cretaceous formations in USGS-Clubhouse Crossroads #1, Dorchester County, South Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 1518, 39 p.Google Scholar
Gradstein, F. M., Agterberg, F. P., Ogg, J. G., Hardenbol, J., van Veen, P., Thierry, J., and Huang, Z. 1995. A Triassic, Jurassic and Cretaceous time scale, p. 95–126. In Berggren, W. A., Kent, D. V., Aubry, M.-P., and Hardenbol, J., (eds.), Geochronology, time scales and global stratigraphic correlation. SEPM Special Publication, 54.Google Scholar
Hattner, J. G., and Wise, S. W. Jr. 1980. Upper Cretaceous calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy of South Carolina. South Carolina Geology, 24:41–117.Google Scholar
Hattner, J. G., Wind, F. H., and Wise, S. W. Jr. 1980. The Santonian–Campanian boundary: Comparison of nearshore–offshore calcareous nannofossil assemblages. Cahiers de Micropaleontologie, 3:9–56.Google Scholar
Manivit, H., Perch-Nielsen, K., Prins, B., and Verbeek, J. W. 1977. Mid Cretaceous calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy. Akademie van Wetenschappen Proceedings, Ser. B, 80(3):169–181.Google Scholar
Moshkovitz, S., and Habib, D. 1993. Calcareous nannofossil and dinoflagellate stratigraphy of the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary, Alabama and Georgia. Micropaleontology, 39:167–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, J. P. 1989. Geologic map of the Cape Fear region, Florence 1°X2° quadrangle and northern half of the Georgetown 1°X2° quadrangle, North Carolina and South Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Map I-1948-A, scale 1:250,000.Google Scholar
Perch-Nielsen, K. 1985. Mesozoic calcareous nannofossils, p. 329–426. In Bolli, H. M., Saunders, J. B., and Perch-Nielsen, K. (eds.), Plankton Stratigraphy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Piveteau, J. 1952. Traite de paleontologie. Paris, Masson, 782 p.Google Scholar
Pospichal, J. J., and Wise, S. W. Jr. 1990. Maestrichtian calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy of Maud Rise ODP Leg 113 Sites 689 and 690, Weddell Sea, p. 465–487. In Barker, P. F. and Kennett, J. P. (eds.), Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results, 113.Google Scholar
Risatti, J. B. 1974. Nannoplankton biostratigraphy of the upper Bluffport Marl–lower Prairie Bluff Chalk interval (upper Cretaceous), in Mississippi. Proceedings of Symposium on Calcareous Nannofossils, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Gulf Coast Section, 1:8–57.Google Scholar
Self-Trail, J. M., and Bybell, L. M. 1997. Calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy of the SCDNR testhole C-15, Jasper County, South Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report, 97-155:1–2.Google Scholar
Self-Trail, J. M., and Gohn, G. S. 1996. Biostratigraphic data for the Cretaceous marine sediments in the USGS-St. George No. 1 core (DOR-211), Dorchester County, South Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey Open-file Report, 96-684:1–29.Google Scholar
Sissingh, W. 1977. Biostratigraphy of Cretaceous calcareous nannoplankton. Geologie en Mijnbouw, 56:37–65.Google Scholar
Stradner, H., and Papp, A. 1961. Tertiare Discoasteriden aus Osterreich und deren stratigraphische Bedeutung mit Hinweisen auf Mexico, Rumanien und Italian. Geologische Bundesanstalt, Jahrbuch 7:1–159.Google Scholar
Sugarman, P. J., Miller, K. G., Bukry, D., and Feigenson, M. D. 1995. Uppermost Campanian–Maestrichtian strontium isotopic, biostratigraphic, and sequence stratigraphic framework of the New Jersey Coastal Plain. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 107:19–37.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swift, D. J. P., and Heron, S. D. Jr. 1969. Stratigraphy of the Carolina Cretaceous. Southeastern Geology, 10:201–245.Google Scholar
Varol, O. 1991. New Cretaceous and Tertiary calcareous nannofossils. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, 182:211–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wind, F. H. 1975. Affinity of Lucianorhabdus and species of Tetralithus in Late Cretaceous Gulf Coast samples. Transactions—Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies, 25:350–361.Google Scholar
Wise, S. W. Jr., and Wind, F. H. 1977. Mesozoic and Cenozoic calcareous nannofossils recovered by DSDP Leg 36 drilling on the Falkland Plateau, southwest Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean, p. 269–492. In Wise, S. W. Jr. (ed.), Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, 36.Google Scholar
Worsley, T., and Martini, E. 1970. Late Maestrichtian nannoplankton provinces. Nature, 225:1242–1243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, J. R., Bergen, J. A., Bown, P. R., Burnett, J. A., Fiorentino, A., Jordan, R. W., Kleijne, A., van Niel, B. E., Romein, A. J. T., and von Salis, K. 1997. Guidelines for coccolith and calcareous nannofossil terminology. Palaeontology, 40:875–912.Google Scholar