Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T00:26:40.596Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Silurian lichid trilobites from northwestern Canada: Ontogeny and phylogeny of lichids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Margaret J. Campbell  and
Brian D. E. Chatterton
Margaret J. Campbell
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E3 Canada
Brian D. E. Chatterton
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E3 Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previously unknown ontogenies of five lichid genera, Dicranopeltis, Platylichas, Borealarges, Dicranogmus and Radiolichas, are described and placed in the context provided by a review of known lichid ontogenies. Lichid phylogenies have been based on holaspid morphology alone without reference to ontogeny. To broaden knowledge of lichid phylogeny, an analysis, based on the last protaspid instar of lichids and possible sister group taxa, is conducted. The results of this analysis show that, within the lichids, the traditional subfamily groupings are not supported, and the sister group of lichids is more likely to be found within the Proetida than the Odontopleurida. Tubercles, a prominent feature of lichid morphology, have not been considered taxonomically significant. An examination suggests that tubercle arrangement and the pattern of change of tubercle arrangement through ontogeny could be important in defining taxa. It is recommended that future work on lichid phylogeny include ontogenetic information and patterns of change in development.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 83 , Issue 2 , March 2009 , pp. 263 - 279
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adrain, J. M. 1994. The lichid trilobite Borealarges n. gen., with species from the Silurian of Arctic Canada. Journal of Paleontology, 68:1081–1099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adrain, J. M. and Chatterton, B. D. E. 1994. The aulacopleurid trilobite Otarion with new species from the Silurian of northwestern Canada. Journal of Paleontology, 68:305–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adrain, J. M. and Ramsköld, L. 1996. The lichid trilobite Radiolichas in the Silurian of Arctic Canada and Gotland, Sweden. Geological Magazine, 133:147–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beecher, C. E. 1893. Larval forms of trilobites from the Lower Heldenberg Group. American Journal of Science, XLVI: 142–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beecher, C. E. 1895. The larval stages of trilobites. The American Geologist, 16:166–197.Google Scholar
Beyrich, F. 1845. Über einige böhmische Trilobiten. Berlin. 47p.Google Scholar
Bradley, J. H. 1930. Fauna of the Kimmswick Limestone of Missouri and Illinois. Contributions of the Walker Museum, 2:219–290.Google Scholar
Campbell, M. J. and Chatterton, B. D. E. 2006. Late Ordovician and Silurian lichid trilobites from Northwestern Canada. Eight new species from subfamilies Lichinae, Platylichinae and Trochurinae. Journal of Paleontology, 80:514–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, M. J. and Chatterton, B. D. E. 2007. Late Ordovician and Silurian lichid trilobites from Northwestern Canada. Hemiarges, Borealarges, and Richterarges. Journal of Paleontology, 81:1348–1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E. 1971. Taxonomy and ontogeny of Siluro-Devonian trilobites from near Yass, New South Wales. Palaeontographica A, 137:1–108.Google Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E. 1980. Ontogenetic Studies of Mid-Ordovician trilobites from the Esbataottine Formation, Mackenzie Mountains, Canada. Palaeontographica A, 171:1–74.Google Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E. 1994. Ordovician proetide trilobite Dimeropyge with a new species from northwestern Canada. Journal of Paleontology, 68:541–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E. and Ludvigsen, R. 1976. Silicified Middle Ordovician trilobites from the South Nahanni River Area, District of Mackenzie, Canada. Palaeontographica A, 154:1–106.Google Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E. and Speyer, S. E. 1997. Ontogeny of Trilobita, p. 173–248. In Kaesler, R. L. (ed,), 1997. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. O, Arthropoda 1. Trilobita, Revised. Volume 1: Introduction, Order Agnostida, Order Redlichiida. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas. Boulder, Colorado and Lawrence, Kansas. 530 p.Google Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E., Edgecombe, G. D., and Tuffnell, P. A. 1990a. Extinction and migration in Silurian trilobites and conodonts of northwestern Canada. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 147:703–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E., Edgecombe, G. D., Vaccari, N. E., and Waisfeld, B. G. 1997. Ontogeny and relationship of the Ordovician odontopleurid trilobite Ceratacara, with new species from Argentina and New York. Journal of Paleontology, 71:108–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E., Edgecombe, G. D., Vaccari, N. E., and Waisfeld, B. G. 1999. Ontogenies of some Ordovician Telephinidae from Argentina, and larval patterns in the Proetida (Trilobita). Journal of Paleontology, 73: 219–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E., Edgecombe, G. D., Waisfeld, B. G., and Vaccari, N. E. 1998. Ontogeny and systematics of Toernquistiidae (Trilobita, Proetida) from the Ordovician of the Argentine precordillera. Journal of Paleontology, 72:273–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E., Siveter, D. J., Edgecombe, G. D., and Hunt, A. S. 1990b. Larvae and relationships of the Calymenina (Trilobita). Journal of Paleontology, 64:255–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, J. M. 1894. The Lower Silurian trilobites of Minnesota. Final report of the Geological and Natural History Survey of Minnesota, 111:695–759.Google Scholar
Edgecombe, G. D. 1992. Trilobite phylogeny and the Cambrian-Ordovician “Event:” cladistic reappraisal. p. 144–177. In Novacek, M. J. and Wheeler, Q. D. (eds.), Extinction and Phylogeny. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Edgecombe, G. D., Chatterton, B. D. E., Vaccari, N. E., and Waisfeld, B. G. 1997. Ontogeny of the proetoid trilobite Stenoblepharum Owens, 1973, and relationships of a new species from the upper Ordovician of Argentina. Journal of Paleontology, 71:419–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgecombe, G. D., Speyer, S. E., and Chatterton, B. D. E. 1988. Protaspid larvae and phylogenetics of encrinurid trilobites. Journal of Paleontology, 62:779–799.Google Scholar
Edgell, H. S. 1955. A Middle-Devonian lichid trilobite from South-Eastern Australia. Palaeontolische Zeitschrift, 29:136–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 1990. Ontogeny, hypostome attachment and trilobite classification. Palaeontology, 33:529–576.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 1997. Classification, p. 289–297. In Kaesler, R. L. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. O, Arthopoda 1. Trilobita, Revised. Volume 1: Introduction, Order Agnostida, Order Redlichiida. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas. Boulder, Colorado and Lawrence, Kansas. 530 p.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. and Chatterton, B. D. E. 1988. Classification of the trilobite suborder Asaphina. Palaeontology, 31:165–222.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. and Owens, R. M. 1975. Proetida—a new order of trilobites. Fossils and Strata, 4:227–239.Google Scholar
Gürich, G. 1901. Über eine neue Lichas-Art aus dem Devon von neu-Süd-Wales und über die Gattung Lichas überhaupt. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie und Palaeontologie, 14:519–539.Google Scholar
Hawle, I. and Corda, A. J. C. 1847. Prodrom einer Monographie der Böhmischen Trilobiten. Prague, 176 p.Google Scholar
Holloway, D. J. and Thomas, A. T. 2002. Hoplolichoides, Allolichas, Autoloxolichas and Akantharges, and the classification of lichid trilobites. Geobios, 35:111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holzapfel, E. 1895. Das Obere Mitteldevon (Schicten mit Stringocephalus burtini_und Maeneceras terabratum) in Rheinischen Gebirge. Abhandlungen der Königlich Preussischen geologischen Landensanstalt, 16:1–459.Google Scholar
Hu, C.-H. 1974. Ontogenies of two Middle Ordovician Trilobites from the Edinburgh Formation, Virginia. Transactions and Proceedings Palaeontological Society of Japan, N. S., 95:353–363.Google Scholar
Hunda, B. R., Chatterton, B. D. E., and Ludvigsen, R. 2003. Silicified Late Ordovician trilobites from the Mackenzie Mountains, Northwest Territories, Canada. Palaeontographica Canadiana, No. 21, 87 p.Google Scholar
Kitching, I. J., Forey, P. L., Humphries, C. J., and Williams, D. M. 1998. Cladistics: the theory and practice of parsimony analysis (2nd edition). Oxford University Press, Oxford. 228 p.Google Scholar
Lamont, A. 1965. Gala-Tarannon trilobites and an ostracod from the Hagshaw Hills, Lanarkshire. Scottish Journal of Science, 1:33–46.Google Scholar
Lee, D.-C. and Chatterton, B. D. E. 1997a. Ontogenies of trilobites from the Lower Ordovician Garden City Formation of Idaho and their implications for the phylogeny of the Cheirurina. Journal of Paleontology, 71:683–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D.-C. and Chatterton, B. D. E. 1997b. Hyristicurid trilobite larvae from the Garden City Formation (Lower Ordovician) of Idaho and their phylogenetic implications. Journal of Paleontology, 71:862–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddison, W. P. and Maddison, D. R. 1992. MacClade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. Version 3.0. Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 398 p.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C., (ed.), 1959. Treatise on invertebrate paleontology, Vol. O (1) (Arthropoda). Geological Society and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Nieszkowski, J. 1857. Versuch einer monographie der in den silurischen Schichten der Ostee-provinzen vorkommenden Trilobiten. Archiv für die Naturkunde Liv-, Est-, und Kurlands, 1:517–626.Google Scholar
Over, D. J. and Chatterton, B. D. E. 1987. Silurian conodonts from the southern Mackenzie Mountains, Northwest Territories, Canada. Geologica et Palaeontologica, 21:1–49.Google Scholar
Perry, D. G. and Chatterton, B. D. E. 1977. Silurian (Wenlockian) trilobites from Baillie-Hamilton Island, Canadian Arctic. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 14:285–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phleger, F. B. 1936. Lichadian trilobites. Journal of Paleontology, 10:593–615.Google Scholar
Reed, F. R. C. 1923. The subgenera of Lichas . Geological magazine, 60:454–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudkin, D. M., Tripp, R. P., and Ludvigsen, R. 1994. The Ordovician trilobite Hemiarges (Lichidae: Trochurinae) from North America and Greenland, P. 289–306. In Landing, E. (ed.), Studies in Stratigraphy and Paleontology in Honor of Donald W. Fisher. New York State Museum Bulletin, No. 481, 380 p.Google Scholar
Shaw, F. C. 1968. Early Middle Ordovician Chazy trilobites of New York. New York State Museum and Science Service. Memoir, 17:1–163.Google Scholar
Speyer, S. E., and Chatterton, B. D. E. 1989. Trilobite larvae and larval ecology. Historical Biology, 3:27–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
St⊘rmer, L. 1942. Studies on trilobite morphology, Pt. II, The larval development, the segmentation and the sutures, and their bearing on larval classification. Norsk geologisk Tiddskrift, 21.Google Scholar
Swofford, D. L. 1993. PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, Version 3.1.1. Illinois Natural History Survey, 1989. 1993, Champaign.Google Scholar
Temple, J. T. 1969. Lower Llandovery (Silurian) trilobites from Keisley, Westmorland. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Geology, 18:197–230.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. T. and Holloway, D. J. 1988. Classification and phylogeny of the trilobite order Lichida. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 321:179–262.Google Scholar
Tripp, R. P. 1957. The classification and evolution of the superfamily Lichacea (Trilobita). Geological Magazine, 94:104–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripp, R. P. 1959. Lichidae. p. 495–503. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Vol. O (1) (Arthropoda). Geological Society and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Tripp, R. P. 1979. Trilobites from the Ordovician Auchensoul and Stinchar Limestones of the Girvan District, Strathclyde. Palaeontology, 22:339–361.Google Scholar
Tripp, R. P. and Evitt, W. R. 1981. Silicified Lichidae (Trilobita) from the Middle Ordovician of Virginia. Geological Magazine, 118:665–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripp, R. P. and Evitt, W. R. 1983. Silicified trilobites of the genus Dimeropyge from the Middle Ordovician of Virginia. Special Papers in Palaeontology, 30:229–240.Google Scholar
Wahlenberg, G. 1818. Petrificata telluris Suecanae. Nova Acta Regiae Societatis Scientiarum Upsaliensis, 8(for 1921): 1–116.Google Scholar
Wang, K., Chatterton, B. D. E., Attrep, J. M., and Orth, C. J. 1993. Late Ordovician mass extinction in the Selwyn Basin, northwestern Canada: geochemical, sedimentological and paleontological evidence. Canadian Journal of Earth Science, 30:1870–1880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warburg, E. 1939. The Swedish Ordovician and lower Silurian Lichidae. Kunglica Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar, 17:1–154.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1956a. Beecher's lichid protaspis and Acanthopyge consanguinea (Trilobita). Journal of Paleontology, 30:1200–1204.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1956b. Silicified Middle Ordovician trilobites: The Odontopleuridae. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 114: 155–288.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1988. Hypostomes of post-Cambrian trilobites. New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, Memoir, 44:321–339.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 2002. Lichidae (Trilobita): Morphology and classification. Journal of Paleontology, 76:306–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, H. B. and Kelly, S. R. A. 1997. Morphological terms applied to Trilobita, p. 313–329. In Kaesler, R. L. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. O, Arthopoda 1. Trilobita (revised). Volume. 1: Introduction, Order Agnostida, Order Redlichiida. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas, Lawrence. 530 p.Google Scholar