Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:35:41.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Silurian dalmanitid trilobite Glyptambon Holloway: new species from Tennessee and Illinois

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Gregory D. Edgecombe
Gregory D. Edgecombe*
Affiliation:
Department of Invertebrates, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, New York 10024
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The hypostome of Glyptambon Holloway, 1981, provides additional morphological evidence that this genus is more closely related to the Siluro-Devonian subfamily Dalmanitinae than to Ordovician “Mucronaspidinae.” New species of Glyptambon are G. amsdeni n. sp., from the Ludlow Brownsport Formation in west-central Tennessee, and G. gassi n. sp., from late Wenlock strata of the Racine Formation in Illinois.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 65 , Issue 2 , March 1991 , pp. 294 - 300
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amsden, T. W. 1951. Brachiopods of the Henryhouse Formation (Silurian) of Oklahoma. Journal of Paleontology, 25:69–96.Google Scholar
Ball, J. R., and Delo, D. M. 1940. New species of Silurian Dalmanites from southeast Missouri. American Midland Naturalist, 24:405–410.Google Scholar
Bassler, R. S. 1915. Bibliographic index of American Ordovician and Silurian fossils. Vol. 1. Bulletin of the Smithsonian Institution. U. S. National Museum, 92:1–1521.Google Scholar
Berry, W. B. N., and Boucot, A. J. (eds.). 1970. Correlation of the North American Silurian rocks. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 102:1–289.Google Scholar
Campbell, K. S. W. 1967. Trilobites of the Henryhouse Formation (Silurian) in Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin, 115:1–68.Google Scholar
Campbell, K. S. W. 1977. Trilobites of the Haragan, Bois d'Arc and Frisco Formations (Early Devonian) Arbuckle Mountains region, Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin, 123:1–227.Google Scholar
Cracraft, J. 1989. Speciation and its ontology: the empirical consequences of alternative species concepts for understanding patterns and processes of differentiation, p. 28–59. In Otte, D. and Endler, J. A. (eds.), Speciation and its Consequences. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Delo, D. M. 1935. A revision of the phacopid trilobites. Journal of Paleontology, 9:402–420.Google Scholar
Destombes, J. 1963. Quelques nouveaux Phacopina (Trilobites) de l'Ordovicien superieur de l'Anti-Atlas (Maroc). Notes du Service Géologique du Maroc, 172:47–65.Google Scholar
Destombes, J. 1972. Les trilobites du sous-ordre des Phacopina de l'Ordovicien de l'Anti-Atlas (Maroc). Notes et Memoires du Service Géologique du Maroc, 240, 113 p.Google Scholar
Edgecombe, G. D. 1990. Encrinurine trilobites from the Silurian Brownsport Formation of Tennessee. Journal of Paleontology, 64:961–967.Google Scholar
Emielity, J. G. 1963. Silurian trilobites of southeastern Wisconsin. Milwaukee Public Museum Publications in Geology, 1, 36 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1864. Notice of some new species of fossils from a locality of the Niagara Group in Indiana, with a list of identified species from the same place. Transactions of the Albany Institute, 4:195–228.Google Scholar
Henry, J.-L. 1965. Revision de deux Zeliszkellinae (Trilobites) des “schistes a Calymenes” (Llandeilien) du Massif armoricain. Bulletin de Société géologique de France, 7:139–145.Google Scholar
Henry, J.-L. 1980. Trilobites ordoviciens du Massif Armoricain. Mémoires de la Société géologique et minéralogique de Bretagne, 22, 250 p.Google Scholar
Holloway, D. J. 1981. Silurian dalmanitacean trilobites from North America, and the origins of the Dalmanitinae and Synphoriinae. Palaeontology, 24:695–731.Google Scholar
Lespérance, P. J. 1988. Trilobites, p. 359–376. In Cocks, L. R. M. and Rickards, R. B. (eds.), A Global Analysis of the Ordovician–Silurian Boundary. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Geology, 43:1–394.Google Scholar
Lespérance, P. J., and Bourque, P.-A. 1971. The Synphoriinae: an evolutionary pattern of Lower and Middle Devonian trilobites. Journal of Paleontology, 45:182–208.Google Scholar
Levi-Setti, R. 1975. Trilobites. A Photographic Atlas. University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, 213 p.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 797 p.Google Scholar
Mikulic, D. G. 1979. The paleoecology of Silurian trilobites with a section on the Silurian stratigraphy of southeastern Wisconsin. Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, Oregon State University, Corvallis, 864 p.Google Scholar
Ramsköld, L. 1985. Silurian phacopid and dalmanitid trilobites from Gotland. Stockholm Contributions in Geology, 40(1):1–62.Google Scholar
Roemer, F. 1860. Die Silurische Fauna des Westlichen Tennessee. Breslau, 1–97.Google Scholar
Vanderberg, A. H. M., Rickards, R. B., and Holloway, D. J. 1984. The Ordovician–Silurian boundary at Darraweit Guim, central Victoria. Alcheringa, 8:1–22.Google Scholar
Vogdes, A. W. 1890. A bibliography of Paleozoic Crustacea from 1698 to 1889, including a list of North American species and a systematic arrangement of genera. U. S. Geological Survey, Bulletin 63:1–177.Google Scholar
Weller, S. 1907. The paleontology of the Niagaran Limestone in the Chicago area. The Trilobita. Bulletin of the Chicago Academy of Science, 4:163–281.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1988. Hypostomes of post-Cambrian trilobites. New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, Memoir 44:321–339.Google Scholar
Willman, H. B. 1973. Rock stratigraphy of the Silurian System in northeastern and northwestern Illinois. Illinois State Geological Survey, Circular 479, 55 p.Google Scholar
Wolfart, R. 1968. Die Trilobiten aus dem Devon Boliviens und ihre Bedeutung für stratigraphie ung tiergeographie, p. 5–201. In Wolfart, R. and Voges, A., Beiträge zur Kenntnis des Devons von Bolivien. Beihefte zum Geologischen Jahrbuch, 74.Google Scholar