Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:41:20.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revision of two Devonian cupressocrinitids from the Schultze collection (Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University) and description of a new Halocrinites (Crinoidea, Eucladida)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2021

Jan Bohatý  and
William I. Ausich Open the ORCID record for William I. Ausich [Opens in a new window]
Jan Bohatý
Affiliation:
Head of Paleontology and UNESCO World Natural Heritage Sites at the Hessian State Office for the Preservation of Historic Monuments and Sites, department A - hessenARCHÄOLOGIE, Biebrich Castle, Rheingaustraße 140, 65203 Wiesbaden, Germany
William I. Ausich*
Affiliation:
School of Earth Sciences, 125 South Oval Mall, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA
*
*Corresponding author
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two cupressocrinitids (Crinoidea, Eucladida) from the famous crinoid collection of Dr. Ludwig J.T. Schultze deposited in the Museum of Comparative Zoology (MCZ) are revised in the present study: Cupressocrinites hybridus n. comb. and Halocrinites minor n. comb. The rare C. hybridus has a stratigraphically and regionally restricted occurrence at the Eifelian–Givetian boundary of the Hillesheim Syncline (Eifel, Rhenish Massif, Germany), but the more common H. minor occurs supraregionally from the Eifelian to the Frasnian (Middle to Upper Devonian). Both cupressocrinitids are redescribed on the basis of the type material stored in the MCZ. In addition, the rare Halocrinites heinorum n. sp. from the Eifelian–Givetian boundary beds and lower Givetian of the Eifel (Rhenish Massif, Germany) is described, and Encrinus townsendi (König, 1825) is questionably reassigned to Robustocrinites: R.(?) townsendi n. comb. Pre- and postmortem ossicular modifications of the studied cupressocrinitid skeletons are also discussed.

UUID: http://zoobank.org/4598e1fa-8ca5-4160-8fee-6e8c6d444115

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 96 , Issue 1 , January 2022 , pp. 196 - 212
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almela, A., and Revilla, J., 1950, Especies fósiles nuevas del Devoniano de León: Notas y Communicaciones del Instituto Geológico y Minero de España, v. 20, p. 45–60.Google Scholar
Amemiya, S., and Oji, T., 1992, Regeneration in sea lilies: Nature, v. 357, p. 546–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausich, W.I., Kammer, T.W., Rhenberg, E.C., and Wright, D.F., 2015, Frontiers in paleontology: early phylogeny of crinoids within the Pelmatozoan clade: Palaeontology, v. 58, p. 937–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausich, W.I., Wright, D.F. Cole, S.R., and Sevastopulo, G.D., 2020, Homology of posterior interray plates in crinoids: a review and new perspectives from phylogenetics, the fossil record, and development: Palaeontology, v. 63, p. 552–545.Google Scholar
Bassler, R.S., and Moodey, M.W., 1943, Bibliographic and faunal index of Paleozoic pelmatozoan echinoderms: Geological Society of America Special Paper 45, 734 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bather, F.A., 1919, Cupressocrinus gibber n. sp. du Dévonien supérieur de Belgique: Bulletin de la Société Belge de Géologie de Paléontologie et d'Hydrologie, v. 28, p. 129–136.Google Scholar
Bohatý, J., 2005a, Doppellagige Kronenplatten: Ein neues anatomisches Merkmal paläozoischer Crinoiden und Revision der Familie Cupressocrinitidae (Devon): Paläontologische Zeitschrift, v. 79, p. 201–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohatý, J., 2005b, Bactrocrinites (Crinoidea) aus dem Mittel-Devon der Eifel (linksrheinisches Schiefergebirge, Deutschland) - Taxonomie, Biostratigraphie und Fazieskontrolle: Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, v. 235, p. 381–410.Google Scholar
Bohatý, J., 2006, Neue Cupressocrinitidae (Crinoidea) aus den mitteldevonischen Kalkmulden der Eifel (linksrheinisches Schiefergebirge, Deutschland): Senckenbergiana Lethaea, v. 86, p. 151–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohatý, J., 2009, Pre- and postmortem skeletal modifications of the Cupressocrinitidae (Crinoidea, Cladida): Journal of Paleontology, v. 83, p. 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohatý, J., 2021, Dr. phil. Ludwig Johann Theodor Schultze (1835–1913)—his biography and the history of his Devonian fossil collection deposited in the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard University: Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, v. 163, p. 97–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohatý, J., and Herbig, H.-G., 2010, Middle Givetian echinoderms from the Schlade Valley (Rhenish Massif, Germany)—habitats, taxonomy and ecostratigraphy: Paläontologische Zeitschrift, v. 84, p. 365–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohatý, J., and Sander, A., (in press), Dr. phil. Ludwig Johann Theodor Schultze (1835–1913)—Biographie eines wohlhabenden Rostocker Paläontologen, Sammlers, Händlers und Bankiers. Geohistorische Blätter—Nachrichtenblatt des Arbeitskreises Geschichte der Geowissenschaften der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Geowissenschaften e. V., Arbeitskreis Geschichte der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft – Geologische Vereinigung (ed.).Google Scholar
Breimer, A., 1962, A monograph on Spanish Palaeozoic Crinoidea: Leidse Geologische Mededelingen 27, 189 p.Google Scholar
Chen, Z., and Yao, J., 1993, Palaeozoic Echinoderm Fossils of Western Yunnan: Beijing, Beijing Geological Publishing House, 102 p.Google Scholar
Cole, S.R., 2017, Phylogeny and morphologic evolution of the Ordovician Camerata (Class Crinoidea, Phylum Echinodermata): Journal of Paleontology, v. 91, p. 815–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, S.R., 2019, Phylogeny and evolutionary history of diplobathrid crinoids (Echinodermata): Palaeontology, v. 62, p. 357–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donovan, S.K., 2021, Cirrus versus radice: a brief study of confused crinoid terminology: Lethaia, v. 54, 3 p., https://doi.org/10.1111/let.12418.Google Scholar
Dubatolova, Yu.A., 1964, Morskie lilii devona Kuzbassa [Devonian crinoids of the Kuznetz Basin]. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Trudy Instituta Geologii i Geofiziki: Moscow, Nauka, 153 p. [in Russian]Google Scholar
Dubatolova, Yu.A., 1975, Devonian crinoids of the Minusin Basin: Trudy Instituta Geologii i Geofiziki AN SSSR, Sibirskoe Otdelenie, v. 272, 58 p. [in Russian]Google Scholar
Faber, P., 1980, Fazies-Gliederung und -Entwicklung im Mittel-Devon der Eifel (Rheinisches Schiefergebirge): Mainzer geowissenschaftliche Mitteilungen, v. 8, p. 83–149.Google Scholar
Gahn, F.J., and Baumiller, T.K., 2005, Arm regeneration in Mississippian crinoids: evidence of intense predation pressure in the Paleozoic?: Paleobiology, v. 31, p. 151–164.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Głuchowski, E., 1993, Crinoid assemblages in the Polish Givetian and Frasnian: Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, v. 38, p. 35–91.Google Scholar
Głuchowski, E., 2005, Epibionts on upper Eifelian crinoid columnals from the Holy Cross Mountains, Poland: Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, v. 50, p. 315–328.Google Scholar
Goldfuß, G.A., 1826–1844, Petrefacta Germaniae tam ea, quae in museo universitatis regiae Borussicae Fridericiae Wilhelmiae Rhenanae servantur, quam alia quaecunque in Museis Hoeninghusiano, Muensteriano aliisque extant iconibus et descriptionibus illustrate (Abbildungen und Beschreibungen der Petrefacten Deutschlands und der angrenzenden Länder, unter Mitwirkung des Herrn Grafen Georg zu Münster, herausgegeben von Dr. Aug. Goldfuß)—1 (1826–33): Divisio secunda: Radiariorum Reliquiae—Strahlenthiere der Vorwelt: Düsseldorf, Arnz and Co., p. 115–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldfuß, G.A., 1839, Beiträge zur Petrefactenkunde: Nova Acta Academiae Caesareae Leopoldino-Carolinae Naturae Curiosorum [= Kaiserlich Leopoldinisch-Carolinische Akademie der Naturforscher, Verhandlungen], v. 19, p. 329–352.Google Scholar
Hauser, J., 1997, Die Crinoiden des Mittel-Devon der Eifler Kalkmulden: Bonn, Author, 274 p.Google Scholar
Hauser, J., 1999, Die Crinoiden der Frasnes-Stufe (Oberdevon) vom Südrand der Dinant Mulde (Belgische und französische Ardennen): Bonn, Author, 156 p.Google Scholar
Hauser, J., 2001, Neubeschreibung mitteldevonischer Eifel-Crinoiden aus der Sammlung Schultze (Museum of Comparative Zoology, The Agassiz Museum, Harvard University, Mass., USA), nebst einer Zusammenstellung der Eifelcrinoiden (Holotypen) der Goldfuss Sammlung: Bonn, Author, 198 p.Google Scholar
Hauser, J., 2006a, Dachsbergcrinites nov. gen. (Crinoidea, Inadunata)—Eine neue Crinoiden-Gattung aus dem Mitteldevon der Eifel (Rheinisches Schiefergebirge): Bonn, Author, http://www.devon-crinoiden.de/Dachsbergcrinites.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hauser, J., 2006b, Cupressocrinites goldfussi n. sp.—Ein neuer Vertreter der Gattung Cupressocrinites Goldfuss, 1831 aus dem Mitteldevon der Eifel (Deutschland, Rheinisches Schiefergebirge): Bonn, Author, http://www.devon-crinoiden.de/cupressogoldfussi.pdf.Google Scholar
Hauser, J., 2007, Die Crinoidenwelt der Eifel vor 350.000.000 (sic!) Jahren—Neue Crinoiden aus dem Mitteldevon (sic!) der Eifel, Teil 2: Bonn, Author, 83 p.Google Scholar
Hauser, J., 2008, Crinoiden und Begleitfauna des Ahbachiums der Rommersheimer Trasse (Prümer Mulde, Eifel, Rheinisches Schiefergebirge): Bonn, Author, 80 p.Google Scholar
Hauser, J., 2010a, Die Crinoidenfauna des Junkerbergiums des “Gondelsheimer Ackers” (Mitteldevon, Prümer Mulde, Eifel, Rheinisches Schiefergebirge): Bonn, Author, 71 p.Google Scholar
Hauser, J., 2010b, Cupressocrinites sebastianhauseri n. sp. aus der Ahrdorf Formation (Eifelium) der Gerolsteiner Mulde (Rheinisches Schiefergebirge, Eifel): Bonn, Author, http://devon-crinoiden.de/cupressosebastianhauseri.pdf.Google Scholar
Hauser, J., 2013, Die Echinodermen und Begleitfauna des Freilingium (Eifelium) der Blankenheimer Mulde: Bonn, Author, 63 p.Google Scholar
Hauser, J., 2015a, Cupressocrinites taluxaiensis n. sp. (Crinoidea, Inadunata) from the Givetian of La Taluxa near Candás (Asturias, Northern Spain):Bonn, Author, http://www.devon-crinoiden.de/Cupressocrinites%20taluxaiensis.pdf.Google Scholar
Hauser, J., 2015b, Crinoiden und Begleitfauna des Freilingiums (Mitteldevon) von Nollenbach (“Auf den Eichen”) (Hillesheimer Mulde, Eifel): Bonn, Author, 95 p.Google Scholar
Hauser, J., 2016a, Das Mitteldevon der Eifel und seine Crinoidenfauna—Neue Crinoide aus dem Mitteldevon der Eifel Teil IV—Mit Beiträgen zu Echinodermen aus dem Kantabrischen Gebirge und dem Südrand der Dinant Mulde: Bonn, Author, 60 p.Google Scholar
Hauser, J., 2016b, Über die Brachia von Cupressocrinites tesserula HAUSER, 1997 und Cupressocrinites inusitatus n. sp. (Crinoidea, Camerata) vom Gondelsheimer Acker (Prümer Mulde, Eifel) mit Beiträgen zur Stratigraphie der Junkerberg Formation in der Prümer Mulde: Bonn, Author, http://www.devon-crinoiden.de/Cupressocrinites%20inusitatus.pdf.Google Scholar
Hauser, J., 2017, Das Cupressocrinites-abbreviatus-Set im Grenzbereich Ahbachium/Looghium (“Eowotanium”) des Steinbruch WOTAN (“Korea-Bruch”): Bonn, Author, 123 p.Google Scholar
Hauser, J., 2019a, Eifelcrinoiden—Neue Beiträge: Bonn, author, 51 p.Google Scholar
Hauser, J., 2019b, Cupressocrinites landetae n. sp. aus der Portilla Formation (Givetium) des Kantabrischen Gebirges (La Paola de Gordon Gebiet, Nordspanien): Bonn, Author, http://devon-crinoiden.de/cupresslandetae.pdf.Google Scholar
Hauser, J., 2021, Crinoiden und Begleitfauna des Heinzeltiums der Prümer Mulde (Rheinisches Schiefergebirge, Mitteldevon, Eifel): Bonn, author, 85 p.Google Scholar
Hauser, J., and Landeta, F.G., 2007, Neue Crinoiden aus dem Paläozoikum von Nordspanien: Bonn, Author, 77 p.Google Scholar
Hauser, J., and Landeta, F.G., 2009, Crinoiden aus dem Unter- und Mitteldevon von Asturien und Leon (Nordspanien): Bonn, Author, 58 p.Google Scholar
Hauser, J., and Landeta, F.G., 2011, Cupressocrinites hibrida n. sp. (Crinoidea, Inadunata) from the Candas Formation (Givetian) of Asturias (Northern Spain): Bonn, Author, http://www.devon-crinoiden.de/cupressocrinites%20hibrida.pdf.Google Scholar
Hauser, J., and Landeta, F.G., 2012, Paläozoische Crinoiden aus Asturien und León (Nordspanien): Bonn, Author, 47 p.Google Scholar
Hotz, E.E., Kräusel, W., and Struve, W., 1955, Die Kalkmulden von Hillesheim und Ahrdorf, in Krömmelbein, K., Hotz, E.E., Kräusel, W., and Struve, W., eds, Zur Geologie der Eifelkalkmulden, Beiheft Geologisches Jahrbuch, v. 17, p. 45–192.Google Scholar
ICZN, 1999, International Code of Zoological Nomenclature: London, International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, https://www.iczn.org/the-code/the-international-code-of-zoological-nomenclature/the-code-online/.Google Scholar
Jaekel, O., 1918, Phylogenie und System der Pelmatozoen: Palaeontologische Zeitschrift, v. 3, p. 1–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, B., 2006, Calibrating the Devonian time scale: a synthesis of U-Pb ID-TIMS ages and conodont stratigraphy: Earth Science Reviews, v. 76, p. 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
König, C.D.E., 1825, Icones Fossilium Sectiles: London, author, 4 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korn, D., 2008, Rheinische Masse. Geologische Übersicht, in Deutsche Stratigraphische Kommission, ed., Stratigraphie von Deutschland VIII, Devon, Schriftenreihe der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Geowissenschaften, v. 52, p. 116.Google Scholar
Krebs, W., 1974, Devonian carbonate complexes of Central Europe, in Laporte, L.F., ed., Reefs in Time and Space: Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Special Publication 18, p. 155–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Menn, J., 1985, Les Crinoides du Dévonien inferieur et moyen du Massif armoricain: Mémoires de la Societé géologique et minéralogique de Bretagne No. 30, 268 p.Google Scholar
Lin, J.-P., and Fürsich, F., 2015, The oldest illustration of Chinese crinoid calyx: annotated translation of “Cupressocrinus abbreviates” reported by Fritz Frech in 1911: Palaeoworld, v. 24, p. 383–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, S.C., 1973, Notes on open nomenclature and synonymy lists: Palaeontology, v. 16, p. 713–719.Google Scholar
Meyer, D.L., and Oji, T., 1993, Eocene crinoids from Seymour Island, Antarctic Peninsula: paleobiogeographic and paleoecologic implications: Journal of Paleontology, v. 67, p. 250–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, W., 1986, Geologie der Eifel: Stuttgart, Schweizerbart'sche, 614 p.Google Scholar
Meyer, W., Stoltidis, J., and Winter, J., 1977, Geologische Exkursion in den Raum Weyer-Schuld-Heyroth-Niederehe-Üxheim-Ahütte: Decheniana, v. 130, p. 322–334.Google Scholar
Miesen, J., 1971, Crinoiden der Eifel: Leverkusen, author, 70 p.Google Scholar
Miesen, J., 1974, Die Versteinerungen im Devon der Eifel: Leverkusen, author, 199 p.Google Scholar
Milicina, V.S., 1977, Crinoidei iz eifelskikh otlozhenii vostochnogo sklona Severnogo i Srednego Urala; Novye materialy po paleontologii Urala: Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Uralskii Nauchnii Tsentr, Institut Geologii i Geokimii, v. 12, p. 123–143.Google Scholar
Miller, J.S., 1821, A natural history of the Crinoidea, or lily-shaped animals; with observations on the genera, Asteria, Euryale, Comatula and Marsupites. Bristol, Bryan & Co., 150 p.Google Scholar
Moore, R.C., and Laudon, L.R., 1943, Evolution and classification of Paleozoic crinoids: Geological Society of America Special Paper 46, 153 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, R.C., Lane, N.G., and Strimple, H.L., 1978, Order Cladida Moore and Laudon, 1943, in Moore, R.C., and Teichert, C., eds., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part T, Echinodermata 2 (Crinoidea): Boulder, Colorado, and Lawrence, Kansas, Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, p. T578–T759.Google Scholar
Mozzi, D., Dolmatov, I.Y., Bonasoro, F., and Carnevali, M.D.C., 2006, Visceral regeneration in the crinoid Antedon mediterranea: basic mechanisms, tissues and cells involved in gut regrowth: Central European Journal of Biology, v. 1, p. 609–635.Google Scholar
Paproth, E., and Struve, W., 1982, Bemerkungen zur Entwicklung des Givetium am Niederrhein. Paläogeographischer Rahmen der Bohrung Schwarzbachtal 1: Senckenbergiana Lethaea, v. 63, p. 359–376.Google Scholar
Polyarnaya, Zh.A., 1973, Members of the genus Cupressocrinites (Crinoidea) from the Givetian of the Southern Urals: Paleontological Journal, v. 7, p. 562–565.Google Scholar
Roemer, C.F., 1845, Beschreibung eines inneren Kelch-Gerüstes bei der Gattung Cupressocrinus: Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geognosie, Geologie und Petrefakten-Kunde, v. 1854, p. 291–296.Google Scholar
Roemer, C.F., 1852–1854, Erste Periode, Kohlen-Gebirge, in Bronn, H.G., ed., Lethaea Geognostica, v. 3: Stuttgart, E. Schweitzerbart, p. 210–291.Google Scholar
Roemer, F.A., 1850, Beiträge zur geologischen Kenntnis des nordwestlichen Harzgebirges: Palaeontographica, v. 3, p. 67.Google Scholar
Sandberger, G., and Sandberger, F., 1856, Ordnung III. Crinoïdea, Meerlilien Miller, in Sandberger, G., and Sandberger, F., eds., Die Versteinerungen des Rheinischen Schichtensystems in Nassau. Mit einer kurzgefassten Geognosie dieses Gebietes und mit steter Berücksichtigung analoger Schichten anderer Länder: Wiesbaden, Kreidel and Niedner, p. 383–403.Google Scholar
Schmidt, W.E., 1941, Die Crinoiden des Rheinischen Devons II. Teil. A. Nachtrag zu: Die Crinoiden des Hunsrückschiefers; B. Die Crinoideen des Unterdevons bis zur cultrijugatus-Zone (mit Ausschluß des Hunsrückschiefers): Abhandlungen der Preußischen Geologischen Landesanstalt, v. 182, 253 p.Google Scholar
Schultze, L.J.T., 1866, Monographie der Echinodermen des Eifler Kalkes: Vienna, Carl Gerold's Sohn, 118 p.Google Scholar
Schultze, L.J.T., 1867, Monographie der Echinodermen des Eifler Kalkes. Denkschrift der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften: Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Classe, v. 26, p. 113–230.Google Scholar
Sieverts-Doreck, H., 1953, Über einige inadunate Crinoiden aus dem rheinischen Devon: Notizblatt des hessischen Landesamtes für Bodenforschung zu Wiesbaden, v. 81, ser. 6, p. 75–87.Google Scholar
Steininger, J., 1831, Bemerkungen über die Versteinerungen, welche in dem Übergangskalkgebirge der Eifel gefunden werden: Trier, Lints, 44 p.Google Scholar
Steininger, F.F., and Piller, W.E., 1999, Empfehlungen (Richtlinien) zur Handhabung der stratigraphischen Nomenklatur: Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, v. 209, p. 1–19.Google Scholar
Struve, W., 1961, Das Eifeler Korallen-Meer: Mineralogische und geologische Streifzüge durch die nördliche Eifel, Aufschluß, Sonderheft, v. 10, p. 81–107.Google Scholar
Struve, W., 1963, Das Korallen-Meer der Eifel vor 300 Millionen Jahren - Funde, Deutungen, Probleme: Natur und Museum, v. 93, p. 237–276.Google Scholar
Struve, W., 1982, The Eifelian within the Devonian frame, history, boundaries, definitions, in Ziegler, W., and Werner, R., eds., On Devonian Stratigraphy and Palaeontology of the Ardenno-Rhenish Mountains and Related Devonian Matters: Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, v. 55, p. 401–432.Google Scholar
Struve, W., 1992, Neues zur Stratigraphie und Fauna des rhenotypen Mittel-Devon: Senckenbergiana Lethaea, v. 71, p. 503–624.Google Scholar
Struve, W., 1996a, On Athyris (Brachiopoda) and its type species ‘Terebratula’ concentrica von Buch, in Alvarez, F., Brunton, C.H.C., and Struve, W., eds., Beiträge zur Kenntnis devonischer Brachiopoden, 26: Senckenbergiana Lethaea, v. 76, 65–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struve, W., 1996b, Eifel (Venn, Bergisches Land); Unterstufen, Formationen, Subformationen; Mitteldevon, in Weddige, K., ed., Devon-Korrelationstabelle: Senckenbergiana Lethaea, v. 76, p. 280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struve, W., 1996c, Brachiopoden, Rheinisches Schiefergebirge; Mitteldevon, in Weddige, K., ed., Devon-Korrelationstabelle, Senckenbergiana Lethaea, v. 76, p. 208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ubaghs, G., 1978, Skeletal morphology of fossil crinoids, in Moore, R.C. and Teichert, C., eds., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part T, Echinodermata 2 (Crinoidea), Volume 1: Boulder, Colorado, and Lawrence, Kansas, Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, p. T58–T216.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F., 1880, Revision of the Palaeocrinoidea I, the families Ichthyocrinidae and Cyathocrinidae: Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1879, p. 226–378.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F., 1885, Revision of the Palaeocrinoidea. Discussion of the classification and relation of the brachiate crinoids, and conclusion of the generic descriptions: Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, v. 37, p. 223–364.Google Scholar
Walter, R., 1995, Geologie von Mitteleuropa: Stuttgart, Schweizerbart'sche, 566 p.Google Scholar
Webster, G.D., 1973, Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids, 1942–1968: Memoirs of the Geological Society of America 137, 341 p.Google Scholar
Webster, G.D., and Maples, C.G., 2008, Cladid crinoid radial facets, brachials, and arm appendages: a terminology solution for studies of lineage, classification, and paleoenvironment, in Ausich, W.I., and Webster, G.D., eds., Echinoderm Paleobiology: Bloomington, Indiana University Press, p. 196–226.Google Scholar
Webster, G.D., Waters, J., and Chen, X., 2009, Revision of the Chen and Yao Devonian to Permian crinoids from Western Yunnan: Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, v. 89, p. 119–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weissmüller, A., 1998, Ein umfangreicher Fund von Encrinus liliiformis Lamarck im Oberen Muschelkalk (mo2) des Diemeltales (Nordhessen): Philippia, v. 8, p. 245–270.Google Scholar
Wright, D.F., 2017a, Bayesian estimation of fossil phylogenies and the evolution of early to middle Paleozoic crinoids (Echinodermata): Journal of Paleontology, v. 91, p. 799–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, D.F., 2017b, Phenotypic innovation and adaptive constraints in the evolutionary radiation of Palaeozoic crinoids: Scientific Reports, v. 7, 13745, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13979-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, D.F., Ausich, W.I., Cole, S.R., Peter, M.E. and Rhenberg, E.C., 2017, Phylogenetic taxonomy and classification of the Crinoidea (Echinodermata): Journal of Paleontology, v. 91, p. 829–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar