Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:15:03.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revision of Rowley's Ordovician(?) and Silurian crinoids from Missouri

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2016

William I. Ausich
William I. Ausich*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Mineralogy, 125 South Oval Mall, The Ohio State University, Columbus 43210
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Eight of the crinoids described by Rowley (1904) are redescribed and reclassified. This material is from northeastern and southeastern Missouri and was believed to include both Early Silurian and Middle Silurian material (Rowley, 1904). Reconsideration of this material changes considerably the interpretation of these fossils. All are assigned to a different genus with some assigned to a different order or subclass. Also, age assignments are clarified. Crinoids studied here that are considered to be probably Late Ordovician rather than Early Silurian are Calceocrinus alleni (previously Deltacrinus alleni), Ptychocrinus insperatus (previously Abludoglyptocrinus insperatus, Glyptocrinus insperatus, and G. insperatus var. carinatus of Rowley, 1904), Ptychocrinus pentagonus (previously Glyptocrinus insperatus var. pentagonus), Gnorimocrinus? problematicus (previously Gissocrinus? problematicus), and Glyptocrinidae genus unknown (previously Lampterocrinus? comptus). Two Middle Silurian (lower Ludlovian) crinoids that were described by Rowley are restudied, Thalamocrinus ovalis (previously Cyathocrinus? ovalis) and Clematocrinus dubius (previously Cordylocrinus? dubius).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 61 , Issue 3 , May 1987 , pp. 563 - 578
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amsden, T. W. 1974. Late Ordovician and Early Silurian articulate brachiopods from Oklahoma, southwestern Illinois, and eastern Missouri. Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin 119, 154 p.Google Scholar
Amsden, T. W., and Barrick, J. E. 1986. Late Ordovician–Early Silurian strata in the central United States and the Hirnantian Stage. Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin 139, 95 p.Google Scholar
Angelin, N. P. 1878. Iconographia crinoideorum in stratis Sueciae Siluricis fossilium. Samson and Wallin, Holmiae, 62 p.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I. 1977. The functional morphology and evolution of Pisocrinus (Crinoidea: Silurian). Journal of Paleontology, 51:672–686.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I. 1984a. Calceocrinids from the Early Silurian (Llandoverian) Brassfield Formation of southwestern Ohio. Journal of Paleontology, 58:1167–1185.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I. 1984b. The genus Clidochirus from the Early Silurian of Ohio (Crinoidea: Llandoverian). Journal of Paleontology, 58:1341–1346.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I. 1985. New crinoids and revision of the superfamily Glyptocrinacea (Early Silurian, Ohio). Journal of Paleontology, 59:793–808.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I. 1986. New camerate crinoids of the suborder Glyptocrinina from the Lower Silurian Brassfield Formation (southwestern Ohio). Journal of Paleontology, 60:887–897.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I., and Bottjer, D. J. 1985. Echinoderm role in the history of Phanerozoic tiering in suspension-feeding communities, p. 3–11. In Keegan, B. F. and O'Connor, B. D. S. (eds.), Echinodermata. A. A. Balkema Press, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Austin, T., and Austin, T. Jr. 1842. Proposed arrangement of the Echinodermata, particularly as regards the Crinoidea, and a subdivision of the class Adelostella (Echinidae). Annals and Magazine of Natural History, ser. 1, 10:106–113.Google Scholar
Ball, J. R. 1939. Stratigraphy of the Silurian System of the lower Mississippi Valley, p. 110–126. In Kansas Geological Survey 13th Annual Field Conference, Kansas Geological Survey.Google Scholar
Bassler, R. S. 1915. Bibliographic index of American Ordovician and Silurian fossils. U.S. National Museum Bulletin 92, 1,521 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassler, R. S. 1938. Pelmatozoa Palaeozoica, 194 p. In Quenstedt, W. (ed.), Fossilium Catalogus, I: Animalia, Pt. 83. W. Junk, s'Gravenhage.Google Scholar
Bassler, R. S., and Moodey, M. W. 1943. Bibliographic and faunal index of Paleozoic pelmatozoan echinoderms. Geological Society of America Special Paper 45, 734 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bather, F. A. 1899. A phylogenetic classification of the Pelmatozoa. British Association for the Advancement of Science Report, (1898):916–923.Google Scholar
Branson, E. B. 1944. The geology of Missouri. University of Missouri Studies 19(3), 535 p.Google Scholar
Brett, C. E. 1978. Systematics and paleoecology of Late Silurian (Wenlockian) pelmatozoan echinoderms. Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 595 p.Google Scholar
Brower, J. C. 1973. Crinoids from the Girardeau Limestone (Ordovician). Palaeontographica Americana 7(46):263–499.Google Scholar
Eckert, J. D. 1984. Early Llandovery crinoids and stelleroids from the Cataract Group (Lower Silurian) in southern Ontario, Canada. Royal Ontario Museum Life Sciences Contributions 137, 83 p.Google Scholar
Flint, R. F., and Ball, J. R. 1926. Revision of the Silurian of southeastern Missouri. Journal of Geology, 34:248–256.Google Scholar
Guensburg, T. E. 1984. Echinodermata of the Middle Ordovician Lebanon Limestone. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 86(319), 100 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1852. Containing descriptions of the organic remains of the lower middle division of the New York System. Palaeontology of New York 2, 362 p.Google Scholar
Jaekel, O. 1895. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der palaeozoischen Crinoiden Deutschlands. Palaeontologische Abhandlungen, 3:1–116.Google Scholar
Jaekel, O. 1898. Uber einige paläozoische Gattungen von Crinoiden. Deutsche Geologische Gesellschaft Zeitschrift, Verhandlungen, 50:28–32.Google Scholar
Jaekel, O. 1918. Phylogenie und System der Pelmatozoen. Palaeontologischen Zeitschrift 3, 128 p.Google Scholar
Kirk, E. 1914. Notes on the fossil crinoid genus Homocrinus Hall. U.S. National Museum Proceedings 75, article 15:1–16.Google Scholar
Kolata, D. R. 1982. Camerates, p. 170–205. In Sprinkle, J. (ed.), Echinoderm faunas from the Bromide Formation (Middle Ordovician) of Oklahoma. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions Monograph 1, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Lowenstam, H. A. 1949. Niagaran reefs in Illinois and their relation to oil accumulation. Illinois Geological Survey Report of Investigations 145, 36 p.Google Scholar
McCracken, A. D., and Barnes, C. R. 1982. Restudy of conodonts (Late Ordovician–Early Silurian) from the Edgewood Group, Clarksville, Missouri. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 19:1474–1485.Google Scholar
McIntosh, G. C. 1983. Review of the Devonian cladid inadunate crinoids: suborder Dendrocrinina. Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 538 p.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Worthen, A. H. 1869. Descriptions of new Crinoidea and Echinoidea, from the Carboniferous rocks of the western states, with a note on the genus Onychaster . Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia Proceedings, 21:67–83.Google Scholar
Miller, J. S. 1821. A natural history of the Crinoidea or lily-shaped animals, with observation on the genera Asteria, Euryale, Comatula and Marsupites . Bryan and Co., Bristol, 150 p.Google Scholar
Miller, J. S., and Gurley, W. F. E. 1895. New and interesting species of Paleozoic fossils. Illinois State Museum Natural History Bulletin 7, 89 p.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. 1952. Crinoids, p. 604–652. In Moore, R. C., Lalicker, C. G., and Fischer, A. B., Invertebrate Fossils. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. 1962. Ray structures of some inadunate crinoids. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Echinodermata, article 5, 47 p.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C., and Laudon, L. R. 1943. Evolution and classification of Paleozoic crinoids. Geological Society of America Special Paper 46, 153 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsbottom, W. H. C. 1951. Two species of Gissocrinus from the Wenlock Limestone. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, ser. 12, 4:490–497.Google Scholar
Rexroad, C. B., and Nicoll, R. S. 1971. Summary of conodont biostratigraphy of the Silurian System of North America, p. 207–225. In Sweet, W. C. and Bergström, S. M. (eds.), Geological Society of America Memoir 127.Google Scholar
Rowley, R. R. 1904. The Echinodermata of the Missouri Silurian and a new brachiopod. The American Geologist, 34:269–282.Google Scholar
Rowley, R. R. 1908. Geology of Pike County. Missouri Bureau of Geology and Mines, 2nd series, 8, 122 p.Google Scholar
Rowley, R. R. 1916. The Edgewood Limestone of Pike County, Missouri. American Journal of Science, 4th series, 41:317–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozhnov, S. H. 1981. Crinoids of the superfamily Pisocrinacea. Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Works of the Paleontology Institute, Vol. 192, 127 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Springer, F. 1913. Crinoidea, p. 173–243. In K. A. von Zittel, Text-book of Palaeontology (translated and edited by Eastman, C. R.) (2nd edition). Macmillan and Co., Limited, London.Google Scholar
Springer, F. 1920. The Crinoidea Flexibilia. Smithsonian Institution Publication 2501, 486 p.Google Scholar
Springer, F. 1926. American Silurian crinoids. Smithsonian Institution Publication 2871, 239 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strimple, H. L. 1954. Two new crinoid species from the Henryhouse of Oklahoma. Washington Academy of Sciences Journal, 44:280–283.Google Scholar
Strimple, H. L. 1975. The rare inadunate crinoid genus Thalamocrinus . Southeastern Geology, 16:249–253.Google Scholar
Sweet, W. C., Ethington, R. L., and Barnes, C. R. 1971. North American Middle and Upper Ordovician conodont faunas, p. 163–193. In Sweet, W. C. and Bergström, S. M. (eds.), Geological Society of America Memoir 127.Google Scholar
Thompson, T. L., and Satterfield, I. R. 1975. Stratigraphy and conodont biostratigraphy of strata contiguous to the Ordovician–Silurian boundary in eastern Missouri. Missouri Geological Survey Report of Investigations 57, part 2:61–108.Google Scholar
Ubaghs, G. 1953. Classe des Crinoïdes, p. 658–713. In Piveteau, J. (ed.), Traité de Paléontologie 3. Masson and Cie, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F. 1880. Revision of the Palaeocrinoidea, Pt. 1, The families Ichthyocrinidae [sic] and Cyathocrinidae. Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences Proceedings for 1879:226–378.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F. 1885. Revision of the Palaeocrinoidea, Pt. 3, sec. 1. Discussion of the classification and relations of the brachiate crinoids, and conclusions of the generic descriptions. Philadelphia Academy of Sciences Proceedings, 223–364:1–162.Google Scholar
Webster, G. D. 1973. Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids, 1942–1968. Geological Society of America Memoir 137, 341 p.Google Scholar
Weller, S., and Clair, S. St. 1928. Geology of Ste. Genevieve County, Missouri. Missouri Bureau of Geology and Mines, 2nd series, 22, 352 p.Google Scholar
Witzke, B. J., and Strimple, H. L. 1981. Early Silurian camerate crinoids of eastern Iowa. Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Sciences, 88:101–137.Google Scholar
Zittel, K. A. von. 1876–1880. Handbuch der Palaeontologie, Band 1, Palaeozoologie. R. Oldenbourg, München and Leipzig, 765 p.Google Scholar
Zittel, K. A. von. 1895. Grundzüge der Palaeontologie (Palaeozoologie) (1st edition). R. Oldenbourg, München, 971 p.Google Scholar