Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T22:30:06.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reinterpretation of Stictostega Shaw, 1967, an Upper Cretaceous cheilostome bryozoan from Arkansas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Paul D. Taylor  and
Frank K. McKinney
Paul D. Taylor
Affiliation:
Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, England
Frank K. McKinney
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC 28608
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The distinctive cheilostome bryozoan Stictostega durhami Shaw, 1967, from the Upper Campanian Ozan Formation of Arkansas, is redescribed and its relationships are reconsidered. Originally interpreted as a hippothoid ascophoran, the presence of a cryptocystal frontal shield and other characters suggest that it is a coilostegan anascan. Pores in the frontal shield are inferred to have served for the passage of parietal muscles (or their ligaments), which operated on the frontal membrane to raise hydrostatic pressure and protrude the lophophore in the same way as recently demonstrated in living Macropora. Stictostega is provisionally interpreted as a stem-group macroporid.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 74 , Issue 1 , January 2000 , pp. 1 - 6
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banta, W. C. 1970. The body wall of cheilostome Bryozoa. III. The frontal wall of Watersipora arcuata Banta, with a revision of the Cryptocystidea. Journal of Morphology, 131:37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banta, W. C., Gray, N., and Gordon, D. P. 1997. A cryptocystal operculum and a new method of lophophore protrusion in the cheilostome bryozoan Macropora levinseni . Invertebrate Biology, 116:161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busk, G. 1852. An account of the Polyzoa and Sertularian Zoophytes collected in the voyage of the Rattlesnake on the coast of Australia and the Louisiade Archipelago, p. 343–402. In MacGillivray, J., Narrative of the Voyage of H.M.S. Rattlesnake, Commanded by the Late Captain Owen Stanley, During the Years 1846-1850, 1. Boone, London.Google Scholar
Canu, F. 1909. Iconographie des Bryozoaires fossiles de l'Argentine. Permière Partie. Anales del Museo Nacional de Buenos Aires, (3), 10:245–341, pls. 1-13.Google Scholar
Gordon, D. P. 1984. The marine fauna of New Zealand: Bryozoa: Gymnolaemata from the Kermadec Ridge. New Zealand Oceanographic Institute Memoir, 91:1–198.Google Scholar
Gordon, D. P. 1993. Bryozoan frontal shields: studies on umbonulomorphs and impacts on classification. Zoologica Scripta, 22:203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, D. P., and Voigt, E. 1996. The kenozooidal origin of the ascophorine coelom and associated frontal shield, p. 89–107. In Gordon, D. P., Smith, A. M., and Grant-Mackie, J. A. (eds.), Bryozoans in Space and Time. Proceedings of the 10th International Bryozoology Conference, Wellington, New Zealand. National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd., Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1848. List of the Specimens of British Animals in the Collection of the British Museum, Pt. I, Centroniae or radiated animals. Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History), London, xiii + 173 p.Google Scholar
Guha, A. K., and Nathan, D. S. 1996. Bryozoan fauna of the Ariyalur Group (Late Cretaceous), Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry, India. Palaeontologia Indica, New Series, 49:1–217.Google Scholar
D'Hondt, J.-L. 1985. Contribution à la systématique des Bryozoaires Eurystomes. Apports récents et nouvelles propositions. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, 13, Zoologie, 7:1–12.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D., Lidgard, S., and Taylor, P. D. 1997. Comparative ecology of bryozoan radiations: origin of novelties in cyclostomes and cheilostomes. Palaios, 12:505–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, W. J., and Cobban, W. A. 1993. Upper Campanian ammonites from the Ozan–Annona Formation boundary in southwestern Arkansas. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark, 40:115–148.Google Scholar
Lidgard, S., McKinney, F. K., and Taylor, P. D. 1993. Competition, clade replacement and a history of cyclostome and cheilostome bryozoan diversity. Paleobiology, 19:352–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López de la Cuadra, C. M., and García Gómez, J. C. 1997. Studies on Recent Macroporidae (Bryozoa: Cheilostomatida), with new taxa and ontogeny of the ovicells. Journal of Zoology, London, 242:605621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandberg, P. A. 1983. Ultrastructure and skeletal development in cheilostome Bryozoa, p. G238–G286. In Boardman, R. S., Cheetham, A. H., Blake, D. B., Utgaard, J., Karklins, O. L., Cook, P. L., Sandberg, P. A., Lutaud, G., and Wood, T. S. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. G, Volume 1, Bryozoa (revised). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Shaw, N. G. 1967. Cheilostomata from Gulfian (Upper Cretaceous) rocks of southwestern Arkansas. Journal of Paleontology, 41:1393–1432.Google Scholar
Taylor, P. D. 1981. Functional morphology and evolutionary significance of differing modes of tentacle eversion in marine bryozoans, p. 235–247. In Larwood, G.P., and Nielsen, C. (eds.), Recent and Fossil Bryozoa. Olsen & Olsen, Fredensborg.Google Scholar
Taylor, P. D. 1988a. Colony growth pattern and astogenetic gradients in the Cretaceous cheilostome bryozoan Herpetopora . Palaeontology, 31:519–549.Google Scholar
Taylor, P. D. 1988b. Major radiation of cheilostome bryozoans: triggered by the evolution of a new larval type? Historical Biology, 1:45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uttley, G. H. 1949. The Recent and Tertiary Polyzoa (Bryozoa) in the collection of the Canterbury Museum, Christchurch. Records of the Canterbury Museum, 5:167–192.Google Scholar
Voigt, E. 1991. Mono- or polyphyletic evolution of cheilostomatous bryozoan divisions. Bulletin de la Société des Sciences Naturelles de l'Ouest de la France, Mémoire HS 1:505–522.Google Scholar
Voigt, E., and Hillmer, G. 1983. Oberkretazische Hippothoidae (Bryozoa Cheilostomata) aus dem Campanium von Schweden und dem Maastrichtium der Niederlande. Mitteilungen aus dem Geologisch-Paläontologischen Institut der Universität Hamburg, 54:169–208.Google Scholar