Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T11:00:02.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Redescription of the ichnospecies Antipus flexiloquus Hitchcock, from the Early Jurassic of the Connecticut Valley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Walter P. Coombs Jr.
Walter P. Coombs Jr.*
Affiliation:
Box 2048, Western New England College, Springfield, Massachusetts 01119
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Many ichnological taxa named by Edward Hitchcock have never been adequately described and illustrated. Among these is the ichnogenus Antipus Hitchcock (1858, p. 115) with two species: A. flexiloquus based on specimens AC (=Amherst College, Amherst, Massachusetts) 35/25 and AC 41/52 (designated the type specimen by Lull 1904, p. 536); and A. bifidus based on specimens AC 23/3, AC 17/2, and AC 23/2 (designated the type specimen by Hitchcock 1865, p. 56). Lull (1904, p. 536) regarded A. bifidus as “… extremely doubtful…” and did not consider it in later publications (e.g., Lull 1915, 1953). The impressions ascribed to A. bifidus might be organic in origin, but if they are trackways, they are totally unlike the tracks of A. flexiloquus. Antipus bifidus is here regarded a nomen dubium because it is undiagnostic. Referred specimen AC 35/25, a small, thin slab of micaceous shale (approximately 87 mm by 96 mm, less than 2 mm thick) that is not mentioned by Lull (1904, 1915, 1953), has one manus and possibly one pes track of such poor quality that analytic comparison to the type of A. flexiloquus is impossible. Therefore, the ichnogenus Antipus has a single species, A. flexiloquus, known only from the type specimen, AC 41/52. Two of the eleven tracks on AC 41/52 have been illustrated (Hitchcock 1858, plate 20, fig. 10; republished with minor revision by Lull 1915, fig. 117; these two tracks are here designated M2 and P4). These simple outline sketches do not accurately portray details of the tracks, and the full trackway pattern was not illustrated.

Type
Paleontological Notes
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 70 , Issue 2 , March 1996 , pp. 327 - 331
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hitchcock, E. 1858. Ichnology of New England, a Report on the Sandstones of the Connecticut Valley, Especially its Fossil Footmarks. William White, Printer to the State, Boston, 220 p. (reprinted at reduced page size by Arno Press, 1974.)Google Scholar
Hitchcock, E. 1865. Supplement to the Ichnology of New England. Wright & Potter, State Printers, Boston, 96 p.Google Scholar
Leonardi, G. (ed.). 1987. Glossary and Manual of Tetrapod Footprint Palaeoichnology. Departamento Nacional da Produção Mineral, Setor de Autarquias Norte, Brasília, Brasil, 117 p.Google Scholar
Lockley, M. G., Logue, T. J., Moratalla, J., Hunt, A. P., Schultz, R. J., and Robinson, J. W. 1995. The fossil trackway Pteraichnus is pterosaurian, not crocodilian: implications for the global distribution of pterosaur tracks. Ichnos, 4:1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lull, R. S. 1904. Fossil footprints of the Jura-Trias of North America. Boston Society of Natural History, Memoirs, 5:461–557.Google Scholar
Lull, R. S. 1915. Triassic Life of the Connecticut Valley. State of Connecticut, State Geological and Natural History Survey Bulletin, 24, 285 p.Google Scholar
Lull, R. S. 1953. Triassic Life of the Connecticut Valley. State of Connecticut, State Geological and Natural History Survey Bulletin, 81, 331 p. (revised edition of Lull, 1915).Google Scholar
Olsen, P. E., Macdonald, N. G., Huber, P., and Cornet, B. 1992. Stratigraphy and paleoecology of the Triassic-Jurassic Deerfield Rift, Massachusetts, p. 488–535. In Robinson, P. and Brady, J. B. (eds.), Guidebook for Field Trips in the Connecticut Valley Region of Massachusetts and Adjacent States (in 2 volumes). New England Intercollegiate Geological Conference, 84th Annual Meeting. Contribution no. 66, Department of Geology and Geography, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003.Google Scholar
Padian, K., and Olsen, P. E. 1984. The fossil trackway Pteraichnus: not pterosaurian, but crocodilian. Journal of Paleontology, 53:178–184.Google Scholar
Padian, K., and Olsen, P. E. 1986. Earliest records of Batrachopus from the southwestern United States, and a revision of some Early Mesozoic crocodylomorph ichnogenera, p. 259–273. In Padian, K. (ed.), The Beginning of the Age of Dinosaurs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Peabody, F. E. 1959. Trackways of living and fossil salamanders. University of California Publications in Zoology, 63:1–72.Google Scholar
Peabody, F. E., McCune, A. R., and Thomson, K. S. 1982. Correlation of the early Mesozoic Newark supergroup by vertebrates, principally fishes. American Journal of Science, 282:1–44.Google Scholar