Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:01:25.166Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A redescription of a Maastrichtian lobster Hoploparia antarctica Wilckens, 1907 (Crustacea: Decapoda), from Chubut, Argentina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

M. B. Aguirre-Urreta ,
E. B. Olivero  and
F. A. Medina
M. B. Aguirre-Urreta
Affiliation:
1Departamento de Ciencias Geológicas, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Universitaria, Buenos Aires, 1428, Argentina
E. B. Olivero
Affiliation:
2CIRGEO, Centro de Investigaciones en Recursos Geológicos, Ramírez de Velasco 847, Buenos Aires, 1414, Argentina
F. A. Medina
Affiliation:
2CIRGEO, Centro de Investigaciones en Recursos Geológicos, Ramírez de Velasco 847, Buenos Aires, 1414, Argentina
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The discovery of beautifully preserved specimens of a macruran decapod provides the basis for redescription of Hoploparia antarctica Wilckens, a hitherto poorly known species from the Campanian–Maastrichtian of the Austral basin of Southern Patagonia. Analyses of the associated molluscan fauna, trace fossils, and sedimentary structures indicate that the material is mostly preserved in calcareous sandstones and coquinas deposited in shallow, well-oxygenated environments. These new findings of H. antarctica in Maastrichtian deposits of the Lefipán Formation of Chubut expand the geographic distribution of the species and add a new element for the comparison of the Lefipán fauna with that of the austral Wedellian Province.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 65 , Issue 5 , September 1991 , pp. 795 - 800
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aguirre-Urreta, M. B. 1989. The Cretaceous decapod Crustacea of Argentina and the Antarctic Peninsula. Palaeontology, 32:499–552.Google Scholar
Aguirre-Urreta, M. B.In press. Nuevos glyfeoideos de Argentina y una reseña de otros crustáceos decápodos cretácicos. IX° Congreso Brasileiro Paleontologia, Fortaleza, Actas.Google Scholar
Ball, H. W. 1960. Upper Cretaceous Decapoda and Serpulida from James Ross. Scientific Report Falkland Island Dependence Survey, 24:1–30.Google Scholar
Bishop, G. A. 1985. Fossil Decapod Crustaceans from the Gammon Ferruginous Member, Pierre Shale (Early Campanian), Black Hills, South Dakota. Journal of Paleontology, 59:605–624.Google Scholar
Bromley, R. G., and Asgaard, U. 1972. The burrows and microcoprolites of Glyphea rosenkrantzi, a Lower Jurassic palinuran crustacean from Jameson Land, East Greenland. The Geological Survey of Greenland, Report, 49:15–21.Google Scholar
Burkenroad, M. D. 1963. The evolution of the Eucarida (Crustacea, Eumalacostraca), in relation to the fossil record. Tulane Studies in Geology, 2:3–16.Google Scholar
Camacho, H. H. 1967. Consideraciones sobre una fauna del Cretácico superior (Maastrichtiano) del Paso del Sapo, curso medio del río Chubut. Ameghiniana, 5:131–134.Google Scholar
Dana, J. D. 1852. Crustacea. United States exploring expedition during the years 1838, 1839, 1840, 1841, 1842 under the command of Charles Wilkes, U.S.N., 13:1–1620; Atlas, 1855, 13:1–27, 96 pls., C. Sherman, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Del Valle, R. A., and Rinaldi, C. A. 1975. Sobre la presencia de Hoploparia stokesi (Weller) en las “Snow Hill Series” de la Isla Vicecomodoro Marambio, Antártida. Contribuciones del Instituto Antártartico Argentino, 190:3–21.Google Scholar
Feldmann, R. M. 1974. Hoploparia riddlensis, a new species of lobster (Decapoda:Nephropidae) from the Days Creek Formation (Hauterivian, Lower Cretaceous) of Oregon. Journal of Paleontology, 48:587–593.Google Scholar
Feldmann, R. M., and Holland, F. D. 1971. A new species of lobster from the Cannonball Formation (Paleocene) of North Dakota. Journal of Paleontology, 45:838–843.Google Scholar
Feldmann, R. M., and Tshudy, D. M. 1989. Evolutionary patterns in macrurous decapod crustaceans from Cretaceous to early Cenozoic rocks of the James Ross Island region, Antarctica, p. 183–195. In Crame, J. A. (ed.), Origins and Evolution of the Antarctic Biota. Geological Society Special Publication, 47.Google Scholar
Frey, R. W., and Pemberton, S. G. 1984. Trace fossil facies models, p. 189–207. In Walker, R. G. (ed.), Facies Models, 2nd ed.Geosciences Canada, Reprint Series, 1.Google Scholar
Glaessner, M. F. 1969. Decapoda, p. R400–R533. In Moore, R. C. and Teichert, C. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. R, Arthropoda 4(2). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Holthuis, L. B. 1974. The lobsters of the superfamily Nephropidea of the Atlantic Ocean (Crustacea: Decapoda). Bulletin of Marine Science, 24:723–884.Google Scholar
Latreille, P. A. 1803. Historie naturelle, générale et particulière, des crustacés et des insectes, 3:1–468. F. Dufart, Paris.Google Scholar
Lesta, P., and Ferello, R. 1972. Región extraandina del Chubut y norte de Santa Cruz, p. 601–654. In Leanza, A. F. (ed.), Geología Regional Argentina. Academia Nacional de Ciencias de Córdoba.Google Scholar
McCoy, F. 1849. On the classification of some British Fossil Crustacea, with notices of new forms in the University collections at Cambridge. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, (2)4:330.Google Scholar
McLeese, D. W., and Wilder, D. G. 1964. Lobster storage and shipment. Bulletin Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 147:3–69.Google Scholar
Mertin, H. 1941. Decapode Krebse aus dem subhercynen und Braunschwaiger Emscher und Untersenon sowie Bemerkungen über einige verwandte Formen in der ober Kreide. Nova Acta Leopoldina, N.F. 10:147–264.Google Scholar
Olivero, E. B., Medina, F. A., and Camacho, H. H. 1990. Nuevos hallazgos de moluscos con afinidades australes en la Formación Lefipán (Cretácico superior, Chubut): significado paleogeográfico. V° Congreso Argentino de Paleontología y Bioestratigrafia, Tucumán, Actas I:129–135.Google Scholar
Petersen, C. 1946. Estudios geológicos en la región del río Chubut medio. Boletín Dirección General de Geología y Minería, 59:1–137.Google Scholar
Piatnitzky, A. 1936. Estudio geológico de la región del río Chubut medio y del río Genoa. Boletín de Informaciones Petroleras, 137:83–118.Google Scholar
Pilsbry, H. A. 1901. Crustacea of the Cretaceous Formation of New Jersey. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 53:111–118.Google Scholar
Quayle, W. J. 1987. English Eocene Crustacea (lobsters and stomatopod). Palaeontology, 30:581–612.Google Scholar
Rathbun, M. J. 1926. The fossil stalk-eyed Crustacea of the Pacific slope of North America. Bulletin of the U. S. National Museum, 138:1–155.Google Scholar
Rathbun, M. J. 1929. New species of fossil decapod crustaceans from California. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 19(21):469–472.Google Scholar
Rathbun, M. J. 1935. Fossil Crustacea of the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain. Special Paper of the Geological Society of America, 2:1–160.Google Scholar
Riccardi, A. C. 1975. Eubaculites Spath (Ammonoidea) del Cretácico superior de Argentina. Ameghiniana, 11:379–399.Google Scholar
Riccardi, A. C. 1987. Cretaceous paleogeography of southern South America. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 59:169–195.Google Scholar
Riccardi, A. C. 1989. The Cretaceous System of Southern South America. Geological Society of America Memoir, 169:1–161.Google Scholar
Rice, A. L., and Chapman, C. J. 1971. Observations on the burrows and burrowing behaviour of two mud-dwelling decapod crustaceans, Nephrops norvegicus and Goneplax rhomboides. Marine Biology, 10:330–342.Google Scholar
Roberts, H. B. 1962. The Upper Cretaceous decapod crustaceans of New Jersey and Delaware. Bulletin New Jersey Geological Survey, 61:163–191.Google Scholar
Sellwood, B. W. 1971. A Thalassinoides burrow containing the crustacean Glyphea udressieri (Meyer) from the Bathonian of Oxfordshire. Palaeontology, 14:589–591.Google Scholar
Sowerby, G. B. 1826. Description of a new species of Astacus found in a fossil state at Lyme Regis. Zoological Journal, 2:493.Google Scholar
Tshudy, D. M., and Feldmann, R. M., 1988. Macrurous decapod crustaceans, and their epibionts, from the López de Bertodano Formation (Late Cretaceous), Seymour Island, Antarctica, p. 291–302. In Feldmann, R. M. and Woodburne, M. O. (eds.), Geology and Paleontology of Seymour Island, Antarctica. Geological Society of America Memoir 169.Google Scholar
Weaver, C. A. 1927. The Roca Formation in Argentina. American Journal of Science, 13:417–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weller, S. 1903. The Stokes Collection of Antarctic Fossils. Journal of Geology, 11:413–419.Google Scholar
Wilckens, O. 1907. Die Llamellibranchiaten, Gastropoden u.s.w. der oberen Kreide Südpatagoniens. Berichte der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft zu Freiburg i Br., 15:97–166.Google Scholar
Zinsmeister, W. J. 1979. Biogeographic significance of the late Mesozoic and early Tertiary molluscan faunas of Seymour Island (Antarctic Peninsula) to the final breakup of Gondwanaland, p. 349–355. In Gary, J. and Boucot, A. (eds.), Historical Biogeography, Plate Tectonics and the Changing Environment. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Biological Colloquium, Selected Papers, Oregon State University Press.Google Scholar