Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:10:10.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A rare diving beetle from Baltic amber: Hydrotrupes prometheus new species reveals former widespread distribution of the genus (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

R. Antonio Gómez  and
Anders L. Damgaard
R. Antonio Gómez
Affiliation:
Graduate Interdisciplinary Program in Entomology and Insect Science, 1040 E. 4th Street, PO Box 210077, Tucson, AZ 85721-0077, USA,
Anders L. Damgaard
Affiliation:
Holstebro, Denmark,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new species in the extant genus, Hydrotrupes Sharp, H. prometheus n. sp., (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae) is described from Baltic amber (Eocene) based on examination of a single female specimen. This description represents one of a limited number of diving beetle taxa described from fossiliferous amber and is currently the oldest known fossil assigned to Agabinae. Based on this specimen Hydrotrupes is at least 40 million years old. The occurrence of Hydrotrupes during the Eocene suggests that the current disjunct distribution of living Hydrotrupes species occurring in western North America and eastern China is a relict of former widespread distribution in the northern continents. Considering the age of this fossil and its similarity to living members of the genus Hydrotrupes, the conservation of morphology in this lineage of diving beetles is notable. Key morphological characters of the new species are illustrated, and the significance of this discovery for understanding Agabinae evolution and the biogeography of this previously hypothesized trans-Beringian lineage is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 88 , Issue 4 , July 2014 , pp. 814 - 822
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alarie, Y., Spangler, P. J., and Perkins, P. D. 1998. Study of the larvae of Hydrotrupes palpalis Sharp with implication for the phylogeny of the Colymbetinae. The Coleopterists Bulletin, 52:313–332.Google Scholar
Balke, M. 2005. Dytiscidae Leach, 1815, p. 90–116. InBeutel, R. G. and Leschen, R. A. B.(eds.), Handbook of Zoology, volume 4, Arthropoda: Insecta. Part 38. Coleoptera, volume 1: Morphology and Systematics (Archostemata, Adephaga, Myxophaga, Polyphaga (partim). Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York.Google Scholar
Balke, M., Beigel, A., and Hendrich, L. 2010. Hydroporus carstengroehni sp. n. und zwei unbestimmte Hydroporinae aus dem baltischen Bernstein (Dytiscidae: Hydroporinae). Nachrichtenblatt der bayerischen Entomologen, 59:2–9.Google Scholar
Balke, M., Ribera, I., and Beutel, R. G. 2003. Aspidytidae: on the discovery of a new beetle family: detailed morphological analysis, description of a second species, and key to fossil and extant adephagan families (Coleoptera), p. 53–66. InJäch, M. A. and Ji, L.(eds.), Water Beetles of China, Volume 3. Zoologisch-Botanische Gesellschaft in Österreich and Wiener Coleopterologenverein, vi + 572 p.Google Scholar
Balke, M., Ribera, I., and Beutel, R. G. 2005. The systematic position of Aspidytidae, the diversification of Dytiscoidea (Coleoptera, Adephaga) and the phylogenetic signal of third codon positions. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 43:223–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berendt, G. C. 1845. Die im Bernstein befindlichen organischen Reste der Vorwelt, gesammelt, in Verbindung mit Mehreren bearbeitet und herausgegeben von Dr. Georg Carl Berendt. Organische reste imbernstein. Commission der Nicolaischen Buchhandlung, Berlin, 125p.Google Scholar
Beutel, R. G. 1994. On the systematic position of Hydrotrupes palpalis Sharp (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). Aquatic Insects, 16:157–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beutel, R. G., Wang, B., Tan, J.-J., Ge, S.-Q., Ren, D., and Yang, X.-K. 2013. On the phylogeny and evolution of Mesozoic and extant lineages of Adephaga (Coleoptera, Insecta). Cladistics, 29:147–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boucot, A. and Poinar, G. O. 2011. Fossil Behavior Compendium. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 424p.Google Scholar
Ezcurra, M. D. and Agnolín, F. L. 2012. A new global palaeobiogeographical model for the late Mesozoic and early Tertiary. Systematic Biology, 61:553–566.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ficáček, M. and Engel, M. S. 2011. An aquatic water scavenger beetle in early Miocene amber from the Dominican Republic (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Annales Zoologici, 61:621–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimaldi, D. A. 1993. The care and study of fossiliferous amber. Curator, 36:31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimaldi, D. A. and Engel, M. S. 2005. Evolution of the Insects. New York, Cambridge University Press, 772p.Google Scholar
Guéorguiev, V. B. 1971. Notes sur les Agabini (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae). I. Les genres Agametrus Sharp, Leuronectes Sharp et Andonectes gen. n. Izvestija na Zoologitjeskija Institut s Musei Sofia, 33:165–176.Google Scholar
Handlirsch, A. 1908. Die fossilen Insekten und die phylogenie der rezenten formen. Ein handbuch für Paläontologen und Zoologen, Leipzig, 1430p.Google Scholar
Helm, O. 1896. Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Insecten des Bernsteins. Schriften Naturforschenden Geselleschaf Danzig, 9:220–231.Google Scholar
Hendrich, L. and Balke, M. 2000. The genus Platynectes Régimbart in the Moluccas (Indonesia): taxonomy, faunistics and zoogeography (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). Koleopterologische Rundschau, 70:37–52.Google Scholar
Hering, D. 1998. Riparian beetles (Coleoptera) along a small stream in the Oregon Coast Range and their interactions with the aquatic environment. Coleopterists Bulletin, 52:161–170.Google Scholar
Hieke, F. and Pietrzeniuk, E. 1984. Die Bernstein-Käfer des Museums zur Naturkunde, Berlin (Insecta, Coleoptera). Mitteilungen aus dem Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin, 60:297–326.Google Scholar
Hong, D. Y. 1993. Eastern Asian–North American disjunctions and their biological significance. Cathaya, 5:1–39.Google Scholar
Jäch, M. A. and Balke, M. 2008. Global diversity of water beetles (Coleoptera) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia, 595:419–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keilbach, R. 1982. Bibliographie und Liste der Arten tierischer Einschlüsse in fossilen Harzen sowie ihrer Aufbewahrungsorte. Teil 1. Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, 29:129–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, C. L. and Berendt, G. G. 1854. Die im Bernstein befindlichen crustaceen, myriapoden, arachniden und apteren der vorwelt. Commission der Nicolaischen Buchhandlung, Berlin, 124p.Google Scholar
Larson, D. J. 1989. Revision of North American Agabus Leach (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae): introduction, key to species groups, and classification of the ambiguus-, tristis-, and arcticus-groups. The Canadian Entomologist, 121:861–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsson, S. G. 1978. Baltic amber, a Palaeological Study. Entomonograph, vol. 1. Scandinavian Science Press Ltd., Klampenborg, 192p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, W. E. 1817. The zoological miscellany; being descriptions of new or interesting animals, illustrated with coloured figures, engraved from original drawings, by R. P. Nodder. R. A. Taylor, London, 151p.Google Scholar
Li, H. L. 1952. Floristic relationships between eastern Asia and eastern North America. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 42:371–429.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, sononymis, locis ed. 10, 823p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magallón, S. A. 2004. Dating lineages: molecular and paleontological approaches to the temporal framework of clades. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 165 (S4), S7–S21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenna, M. C. 1983. Cenozoic paleogeography of North Atlantic land bridges, p. 351–395. InBott, M. H. P., Saxov, S., Talwani, M., and Thiede, J.(eds.), Structure and Development of the Greenland-Scotland Bridge: New Concepts and Methods. New York, Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelsen, V. 2000. Oldest authentic record of a fossil calyptrate fly (Diptera): a species of Anthomyiidae from early Coenozoic Baltic amber. Studia Dipterologica, 7:11–18.Google Scholar
Miller, K. B. 2001. On the phylogeny of the Dytiscidae (Coleoptera) with emphasis on the morphology of the female reproductive tract. Insect Systematics and Evolution, 32:45–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, K. B. and Balke, M. 2003. The unusual occurrence of water beetles in amber: Copelatus aphroditae Balke n. sp. and C. predaveterus Miller n. sp. (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae: Copelatinae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 105:809–815.Google Scholar
Miller, K. B. and Perkins, P. D. 2012. The Diving Beetle Species Hydrotrupes palpalis Sharp, 1882 (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). The Coleopterists Bulletin, 66:371–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, A. F. 1997. A review of Agyrtidae (Coleoptera), with a new genus and species from New Zealand. Annales Zoologici, 47:111–156.Google Scholar
Nilsson, A. N. 1997. A redefinition and revision of the Agabus optatus-group (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae); an example of Pacific intercontinental disjunction. Entomologica Basiliensia, 19:621–651.Google Scholar
Nilsson, A. N. 2000. A new view on the generic classification of the Agabus-group of genera of the Agabini, aimed at solving the problem with a paraphyletic Agabus (Dytiscidae). Koleopterologische Rundschau, 70:17–36.Google Scholar
Nilsson, A. N. 2001. Dytiscidae (Coleoptera). InWorld Catalogue of Insects, Volume 3. Stenstrup, Apollo Books, 395p.Google Scholar
Nilsson, A. N. 2003. Dytiscidae: XII. A new species of Hydrotrupes Sharp from China, an example of Pacific intercontinental disjunction (Coleoptera), p. 279–284. InJäch, M. A. and Ji, L.(eds.), Water Beetles of China, Volume 3. Zoologisch-Botanische Gesellschaft in Österreich and Wiener Coleopterologenverein, vi + 572p.Google Scholar
Nilsson, A. N. 2013. A World Catalogue of the family Dytiscidae, or the Diving Beetles (Coleoptera, Adephaga). Version 1.I.2013. Umeå: distributed electronically as a PDF file by the author, 304p.Google Scholar
Poinar, G. O. 1992. Life in Amber. Stanford University Press, Stanford, 350p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poinar, G. O. and Poinar, R. 1999. The Amber Forest: A Reconstruction of a Vanished World. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 239p.Google Scholar
Prokin, A. A. and Ren, D. 2010. New Mesozoic diving beetles (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae) from China. Paleontologiceskij Zurnal, 2010(5):47–53. English translation in Paleontological Journal 44:526–533. (In Russian)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Régimbart, M. 1879. Étude sur la classification des Dytiscidae. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France (5) 8(1878):447–466 + pl. 10:1–28.Google Scholar
Ribera, I., Beutel, R. G., Balke, M., and Vogler, A. P. 2002. Discovery of Aspidytidae, a new family of aquatic Coleoptera. Proceedings of the Royal Society Biological Sciences Series B, 269 (1507):2351–2356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ribera, I., Bilton, D. T., Balke, M., and Hendrich, L. 2003. Evolution, mitochondrial DNA phylogeny and systematic position of the Macaronesian endemic Hydrotarsus Falkenström (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). Systematic Entomology, 28:493–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribera, I., Nilsson, A. N., and Vogler, A. P. 2004. Phylogeny and historical biogeography of Agabinae diving beetles (Coleoptera) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 30:545–562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ribera, I., Vogler, A. P., and Balke, M. 2008. Phylogeny and diversification of diving beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). Cladistics, 24:563–590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ritzkowski, S. 1997. K-Ar-Altersbestimmungen der bernsteinführenden Sedimente des Samlandes (Paläogen, Bezirk Kaliningrad). Matalla, Bochum, 66:19–23.Google Scholar
Roughley, R. E. 2000. Subfamily Hydrotrupinae Roughley, new subfamily, p. 52–54. InLarson, D. J., Alarie, Y., and Roughley, R. E.(eds.), Predaceous Diving Beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) of the Nearctic Region, with Emphasis on the Fauna of Canada and Alaska. National Research Council of Canada Research Press, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 982 p.Google Scholar
Sanmartín, I., Enghoff, E., and Ronquist, F. 2001. Patterns of animal dispersal, vicariance and diversification in the Holarctic. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 73:345–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, A. R. and Dilcher, D. L. 2007. Aquatic organisms as amber inclusions and examples from a modern swamp forest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A., 104:16581–16585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharp, D. 1882. On aquatic carnivorous Coleoptera or Dytiscidae. Scientific Transactions of the Royal Dublin Society, 2:179–1003.Google Scholar
Spahr, U. 1981a. Bibliographie der Bernstien- und Kopal-Käfer (Coleoptera). Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde. Serie B (Geologie und Paläontologie), 72:1–21.Google Scholar
Spahr, U. 1981b. Systematischer Katalog der Bernsteinund Kopal-Käfer (Coleoptera). Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde. Serie B (Geologie und Paläontologie), 80:1–107.Google Scholar
Spangler, P. J. and Steiner, W. E. 2005. A new aquatic beetle family, Meruidae, from Venezuela (Coleoptera: Adephaga). Systematic Entomology, 30:339–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, C. G. 1867. Skandinaviens Coleoptera, synoptiskt bearbetade. Vol. IX. Lund, Lundbergska Boktryckeriet, 407p.Google Scholar
Thorne, R. F. 1972. Major disjunctions in the geographical ranges of seed plants. Quarterly Review of Biology, 47:365–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weidner, H. 1958. Einige interessante Insektenlarven aus der Bernsteininklusen-Sammlung des geologischen Staatsinstituts Hamburg (Odonata, Coleoptera, Megaloptera, Planipennia). Mitteilungen aus dem geologischen Staatsinstitut Hamburg, 27:50–68.Google Scholar
Weitschat, W., and Wichard, W. 1998. Atlas der Pflanzen und Tiere im baltischen Bernstein. Pfeil, München, 256p.Google Scholar
Weitschat, W., and Wichard, W. 2010. Baltic amber, p. 81–115. InPenney, D.(ed.), Biodiversity of fossils in amber from the major world deposits. Siri Scientific Press, Manchester, 303 p.Google Scholar
Wen, J. 1999. Evolution of eastern Asian and eastern North American disjunct distributions in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 30:421–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyenbergh, H. 1869. Sur les insectes fossils du Calcaire Lithographique de la Bavière, qui se trouvent au Musee Teyler. Archives du Musée Teyler, Harlem, 2:1–48+ pls. i–iv.Google Scholar
Wichard, W. and Weitschat, W. 1996. Wasserinsekten im Bernstein. Eine paläobiologische Studie. Entomologische Mitteilungen aus dem Löbbecke Museum + Aquazoo, 4:1–122.Google Scholar
Wichard, W., Gröhn, C., and Seredszus, F. 2009. Wasserinsekten im Baltischen Bernstein. Verlag Kessel, Remagen-Oberwinter, Germany, 336p.Google Scholar
Wu, Z. Y. 1983. On the significance of Pacific intercontinental discontinuity. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 70:577–590.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, J. 1986. Liste der vom Baltischen und Dominikanischen Bernstein bekannten Familien fossiler Käfer (Coleoptera). Entomologische Zeitschrift, 20:298–301.Google Scholar