Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:02:40.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A primitive earwig in Cretaceous amber from Myanmar (Dermaptera: Pygidicranidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Michael S. Engel  and
David A. Grimaldi
Michael S. Engel
Affiliation:
1Division of Entomology, Natural History Museum, and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 1460 Jayhawk Boulevard, Snow Hall, University of Kansas, Lawrence 66045-7523
David A. Grimaldi
Affiliation:
2Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York 10024-5192
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The earwigs comprise an order (Dermaptera) of polyneopterous insects allied to the Dictyoptera and Grylloblattodea (Giles, 1963; Hennig, 1969; Boudreaux, 1979). Dermaptera have at times in the past been allied with the Phasmida, Embiodea, and Plecoptera (e.g., Blacklith and Blacklith, 1968; Jamieson, 1987) but these relationships do not seem to be congruent with the overall body of data for Polyneoptera phylogeny and the monophyly of a Grylloblattodea + Dermaptera + Dictyoptera clade currently has perhaps more evidence than competing hypotheses (e.g., Carpenter and Wheeler, 1999; Wheeler et al., 2001). However, revised morphological and paleontological evidence may suggest that Dermaptera are basal within Anartioptera—a clade consisting of Plecopterida, Orthopterida, Grylloblattodea, and Mantophasmatodea, as well as the earwigs (e.g., Engel and Grimaldi, 2004). The earwigs are certainly autapomorphic, like many polyneopterous insects, and their definitive placement remains elusive.

Type
Paleontological Notes
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 78 , Issue 5 , September 2004 , pp. 1018 - 1023
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Audinet-Serville, J. G. 1831. Revue méthodique des insectes de l'ordre des Orthoptères. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, 22:28–65.Google Scholar
Bechly, G. 1998. New fossil dragonflies from the Lower Cretaceous Crato Formation of north-east Brazil (Insecta: Odonata). Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, serie B (Geologie und Paläontologie), 264:1–66.Google Scholar
Bey-Bienko, G. Y. 1936. Insectes dermaptères, p. 1–239. In Payha SSSR, 5 [Fauna of the USSR, 5]. Akademii Nauk [Academy of Sciences], Moscow. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Blacklith, R. E., and Blacklith, R. M. 1968. A numerical taxonomy of orthopteroid insects. Australian Journal of Zoology, 16:111–131.Google Scholar
Boudreaux, H. B. 1979. Arthropod Phylogeny, with Special Reference to Insects. Wiley-Interscience, New York, viii + 320 p.Google Scholar
Burr, M. 1911. Dermaptera (earwigs) preserved in amber from Prussia. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London, 11:145–150.Google Scholar
Carle, F. L., and Wighton, D. C. 1990. Odonata, p. 51–68. In Grimaldi, D. A. (ed.), Insects from the Santana Formation, Lower Cretaceous, of Brazil. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 195:1–191.Google Scholar
Carpenter, F. M. 1992. Superclass Hexapoda, p. 1–655. In Kaesler, R. L. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. R, Arthropoda 3–4. Geological Society of America, Boulder.Google Scholar
Carpenter, J. M., and Wheeler, W. C. 1999. Cladística numérica, análisis simultáneo y filogenia de hexápodos. Boletin de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa, 26:333–346.Google Scholar
Chhibber, H. L. 1934. The Mineral Resources of Burma. Macmillan, London, 320 p.Google Scholar
Cockerell, T. D. A. 1917. Arthropods in Burmese amber. American Journal of Science, series 4, 44:360–368.Google Scholar
Cockerell, T. D. A. 1920. Fossil arthropods in the British Museum—IV. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 9, 6:211–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockerell, T. D. A. 1922. Fossils in Burmese amber. Nature, 109:713–714.Google Scholar
Coram, R., Jarzembowski, E. A., and Ross, A. J. 1995. New records of Purbeck fossil insects. Proceedings of the Dorset Natural History and Archaeological Society, 116:146–150.Google Scholar
Cruickshank, R. D., and Ko, K. 2003. Geology of an amber locality in the Hukawng Valley, northern Myanmar. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 21:441–455.Google Scholar
de Geer, C. 1773. Mémoires pour Servir à l'Histoire des Insectes [tome troisième]. Hesselberg, Stockholm, viii + 696 p., 44 pls.Google Scholar
Engel, M. S. 2001. A monograph of the Baltic amber bees and evolution of the Apoidea (Hymenoptera). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 259:1–192.Google Scholar
Engel, M. S. 2003. The earwigs of Kansas, with a key to genera north of Mexico (Insecta: Dermaptera). Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science, 106:115–123.Google Scholar
Engel, M. S., and Grimaldi, D. A. 2000. A winged Zorotypus in Miocene amber from the Dominican Republic (Zoraptera: Zorotypidae), with discussion on relationships of and within the order. Acta Geologica Hispanica, 35:149–164.Google Scholar
Engel, M. S., and Grimaldi, D. A. 2002. The first Mesozoic Zoraptera (Insecta). American Museum Novitates, 3362:1–20.Google Scholar
Engel, M. S., and Grimaldi, D. A. 2004. A new rock crawler in Baltic amber, with comments on the order (Mantophasmatodea: Mantophasmatidae). American Museum Novitates, 3431:1–11.Google Scholar
Engel, M. S., Lim, J.-D., Baek, K.-S., and Martin, L. D. 2002. An earwig from the Lower Cretaceous of Korea (Dermaptera: Forficulina). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 75:86–90.Google Scholar
Giles, E. T. 1963. The comparative external morphology and affinities of the Dermaptera. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society (London), 115:95–164.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, D., and Blagoderov, V.In press. Cretaceous insects of the Santana Formation, Brazil: overview of a highly diverse Gondwanan Lagerstätte. In Anderson, J. M. (ed.), Gondwana Alive.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, D. A., Engel, M. S., and Nascimbene, P. C. 2002. Fossiliferous Cretaceous amber from Myanmar (Burma): its rediscovery, biotic diversity, and paleontological significance. American Museum Novitates, 3361:1–72.Google Scholar
Haas, F. 1995. The phylogeny of the Forficulina, a suborder of the Dermaptera. Systematic Entomology, 20:85–98.Google Scholar
Haas, F., and Kukalová-Peck, J. 2001. Dermaptera hindwing structure and folding: new evidence for familial, ordinal and superordinal relationships within Neoptera (Insecta). European Journal of Entomology, 98:445–509.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. 1969. Die Stammesgeschichte der Insekten. Kramer, Frankfurt am Main, 436 p.Google Scholar
International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. 1999. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (fourth edition). International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London, xxix + 306 p.Google Scholar
Jamieson, B. G. M. 1987. The Ultrastructure and Phylogeny of Insect Spermatozoa. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, xv + 320 p.Google Scholar
Jarzembowski, E. A. 1999. Arthropods 2: Insects, p. 149–160. In Swift, A. and Martill, D. M. (eds.), Fossils of the Rhaetian Penarth Group. The Palaeontological Association, London.Google Scholar
Jarzembowski, E. A., and Ross, A. J. 1993. Arthropoda (Hexapoda; Insecta), p. 363–426. In Benton, M. J. (ed.), The Fossil Record 2. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
Keilbach, R. 1982. Bibliographie und Liste der Arten tierischer Einschlüsse in fossilen Harzen sowie ihrer Aufbewahrungsorte. Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, 29:129–286, 301–391.Google Scholar
Klass, K.-D. 2001. The female abdomen of the viviparous earwig Hemimerus vosseleri (Insecta: Dermaptera: Hemimeridae), with a discussion of the postgenital abdomen of Insecta. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 131:251–307.Google Scholar
Kukalová-Peck, J., and Peck, S. B. 1993. Zoraptera wing structures: evidence for new genera and relationship with the blattoid orders (Insecta: Blattoneoptera). Systematic Entomology, 18:333–350.Google Scholar
Martins-Neto, R. G. 1990. Primeiro registro de Dermaptera (Insecta, Orthopteromorpha) na Formação Santana (Cretáceo Inferior), Bacia do Araripe, Nordeste do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 34(4):775–784.Google Scholar
Nakata, S., and Maa, T. C. 1974. A review of the parasitic earwigs (Dermaptera: Arixeniina; Hemimerina). Pacific Insects, 16:307–374.Google Scholar
Nascimbene, P., and Silverstein, H. 2000. The preparation of fragile Cretaceous ambers for conservation and study of organismal inclusions, p. 93–102. In Grimaldi, D. (ed.), Studies on Fossils in Amber, with Particular Reference to the Cretaceous of New Jersey. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden.Google Scholar
Noetling, F. 1892. Preliminary report on the economic resources of the amber and jade mines area in Upper Burma. Records of the Geological Survey of India, 25:130–135.Google Scholar
Ping, C. 1935. On four fossil insects from Sinkiang. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 1:107–115.Google Scholar
Poinar, G. O. Jr. 1992. Life in Amber. Stanford University Press, Stanford, xiii + [1] + 350 p.Google Scholar
Popham, E. J. 1959. The anatomy in relation to feeding habits of Forficula auricularia L. and other Dermaptera. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 133:251–300.Google Scholar
Popham, E. J. 1973. Is Hemimerus an earwig? Entomologist (London), 106:193–195.Google Scholar
Popham, E. J. 1985. The mutual affinities of the major earwig taxa (Insecta, Dermaptera). Zeitschrift für zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung, 23:199–214.Google Scholar
Popham, E. J. 1990. Dermaptera, p. 69–75. In Grimaldi, D. A. (ed.), Insects from the Santana Formation, Lower Cretaceous, of Brazil. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 195:1–191.Google Scholar
Rasnitsyn, A. P., and Quicke, D. L. J. (eds.). 2002. History of Insects. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, xii + 517 p.Google Scholar
Rasnitsyn, A. P., and Ross, A. J. 2000. A preliminary list of arthropod families present in the Burmese amber collection at the Natural History Museum, London. Bulletin of the Natural History Museum, London (Geology), 56:21–24.Google Scholar
Rehn, J. A. G., and Rehn, J. W. H. 1935. A study of the genus Hemimerus (Dermaptera, Hemimerina, Hemimeridae). Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences (Philadelphia), 87:457–508.Google Scholar
Ross, A. J., and York, P. V. 2000. A list of type and figured specimens of insects and other inclusions in Burmese amber. Bulletin of the Natural History Museum, London (Geology), 56:11–20.Google Scholar
Spahr, U. 1992. Ergänzungen und Berichtigungen zu R. Keilbachs Bibliographie und Liste der Bernsteinfossilien—Klasse Insecta (ausgenommen: ‘Apterygota.’ Hemipteroidea, Coleoptera, Hymenoptera, Mecopteroidea). Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, serie B (Geologie und Paläontologie), 182:1–102.Google Scholar
Stuart, M. 1923. Geological traverses from Assam to Myitkyina, through the Hukong [sic] Valley; Myitkyina to northern Putao; and Myitkyina to the Chinese frontier. Records of the Geological Survey of India, 54:398–411.Google Scholar
Verhoeff, K. W. 1902. Über Dermapteren. 1. Aufsatz: Versuch eines neuen, natürlicheren Systems auf vergleichend-morphologischer Grundlage und über den Mikrothorax der Insecten. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 25:181–208.Google Scholar
Vishniakova, V. H. 1980. Earwigs from the Upper Jurassic of the Karatau Range (Insecta, Forficulida). Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal [Paleontological Journal], 1980:78–94. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Vishniakova, V. H. 1985. A new earwig from the Jurassic of Siberia. Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta, Akademii Nauk SSSR [Transactions of the Paleontological Institute, Academy of Sciences USSR], 211:146–147. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Vishniakova, V. H. 1986. Earwigs: forficulida (= Dermaptera), p. 171. In Rasnitsyn, A. P. (ed.), Insects in the Early Cretaceous Ecosystems of the West Mongolia. Trudy Sovmestnaya Sovetsko-Mongolskaya Paleontologicheskaya Ekspeditsiya [Transactions of the Joint Soviet-Mongolian Paleontological Expedition], 28. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Vršanský, P. 1999. Lower Cretaceous Blattaria. Proceedings of the 1st International Paleoentomological Conference (Moscow), 1998:167–176.Google Scholar
Whalley, P. E. S. 1985. The systematics and palaeogeography of the Lower Jurassic insects of Dorset, England. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Geology, 39:107–189.Google Scholar
Wheeler, W. C., Whiting, M., Wheeler, Q. D., and Carpenter, J. M. 2001. The phylogeny of the extant hexapod orders. Cladistics, 17:113–169, 403–404.Google Scholar
Willmann, R. 1990. Insekten aus der Fur-Formation von Dänemark (Moler, ob. Paleozän/unt. Eozän?), 2. Dermaptera. Meyniana, 42:15–24.Google Scholar
Zhang, J.-F. 1994. Discovery of primitive fossil earwigs (Insecta) from the Late Jurassic of Laiyang, Shandong and its significance. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 33:229–245. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Zhang, J.-F. 2002. The most primitive earwigs (Archidermaptera, Dermaptera, Insecta) from the Upper Jurassic of Nei Monggol Autonomous Region, northeastern China. Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica, 19:348–362.Google Scholar
Zherikhin, V. V. 1978. Development and changes of the Cretaceous and Caenozoic faunistic assemblages (Tracheata and Chelicerata). Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta, Akademii Nauk SSSR, 165:1–198. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Zherikhin, V. V., and Ross, A. J. 2000. A review of the history, geology and age of Burmese amber (burmite). Bulletin of the Natural History Museum, London (Geology), 56:3–10.Google Scholar